I was the only one right about Xtoxm being town you d*%!@$$ ...Gorrad wrote:And we all know how great your vibes are.Blackberry wrote:I'm thinking BooKitty is mafia with both Gorrad and CyberBob and she is trying to distract attention from her partners by throwing it on me. And I think there is 5 mafia because I keep getting this vibe that scum aer anxious cuz they could win this lynch.
People are acting weird this round, Iunno how to explain it.
Scum know who are town and who aren't ahead of time, some this doesn't help you much. Also, you weren't the only one, I believe armlx said that he was getting "stupid townie" vibes form xtoxm? Much like EVERYONE gets from you... now please, STFU nublet.Blackberry wrote:I was the only one right about Xtoxm being town you d*%!@$$ ...Gorrad wrote:And we all know how great your vibes are.Blackberry wrote:I'm thinking BooKitty is mafia with both Gorrad and CyberBob and she is trying to distract attention from her partners by throwing it on me. And I think there is 5 mafia because I keep getting this vibe that scum aer anxious cuz they could win this lynch.
People are acting weird this round, Iunno how to explain it.
Blackberry, if a cop claims with a guilty on someone, and the cop appears sane, who wouldn't want to vote that person?Blackberry wrote:BOOKITTY-- mafia knew that Niv wasn't a scum and so would easily agree with that lynch and would blame the lynch on me, so why not go after that?
Ah I missed the unvote. Where do you stand with today's vote and why?ChaosOmega wrote:I'm assuming you're talking about Twomz' post 393:farside22 wrote:Post 416 voted for xtoxm after someone said not to. (a bit hypocritical coming from day one)
However, my vote was the fourth on Xtoxm.Twomz wrote:Xtoxm is now at -2 to lynch. I don't think we should put him at -1, so I'd say hold off on the votes.
Still if you thought Xtomx was town don't you think you should have tried hard not to lynch him as you stated I should have?armlx wrote:Farside: In your analysis of me, you cite post 521 as a contradiction. It hardly is. The extra townie doesn't add an additional game day barring a lucky RB and confirming xtoxm as town and moving along is better than the day going to deadline, there being a no lynch, and xtoxm probably being lynched the next day for the same reasons leaving us very boned.
After his BB vote, Bookitty looks a lot more scummy. No reason to lynch him today though. Again, Cyberbob should be the lynch.
Waiting for a vote count to do anything else.
Iammars, I love you, but you are also a d$!*a$$ ...Iammars wrote:Blackberry, if a cop claims with a guilty on someone, and the cop appears sane, who wouldn't want to vote that person?Blackberry wrote:BOOKITTY-- mafia knew that Niv wasn't a scum and so would easily agree with that lynch and would blame the lynch on me, so why not go after that?
Okay, I tolerated this about as long as I think I should have to. Armlx, I'm female. Please stop calling me "him".armlx wrote:After his BB vote, Bookitty looks a lot more scummy. No reason to lynch him today though. Again, Cyberbob should be the lynch.
Waiting for a vote count to do anything else.
I'm sorry. I wasn't talking about Monkey's investigation of you. I was posing a hypothetical situation which was meant to parallel your fake claim.Blackberry wrote:Iammars, I love you, but you are also a d$!*a$$ ...
A: The cop's NAME clearly indicated he is f**king insane/paranoid
B: I wouldn't vote him--given evidence on Day One about Godfather and the fact that the Cop got me as a guilty and I know I'm not scum.
I did defend him up until the point the day could only end in a no lynch or his lynch, of which his lynch was more beneficial to the town.farside22 wrote:Still if you thought Xtomx was town don't you think you should have tried hard not to lynch him as you stated I should have?armlx wrote:Farside: In your analysis of me, you cite post 521 as a contradiction. It hardly is. The extra townie doesn't add an additional game day barring a lucky RB and confirming xtoxm as town and moving along is better than the day going to deadline, there being a no lynch, and xtoxm probably being lynched the next day for the same reasons leaving us very boned.
After his BB vote, Bookitty looks a lot more scummy. No reason to lynch him today though. Again, Cyberbob should be the lynch.
Waiting for a vote count to do anything else.
In all the post I just reread from you not once have you tried to find scum or attempted to justify a vote you made. It was all agreement with others and not much offered in any way shape or form. Plus when you come on to say you were busy after being gone for a week (lets say a week) you just said you were busy, but came on with enough time to place a vote? That in it's self looks suspicious.Cyberbob wrote:I haven't claimed, no.
This is ridiculous. I've defended myself against virtually every accusation levelled at me (notice how hasd mysteriously left me alone after I pointed out the hypocrisy he showed in accusing me of lurking?), so now I'm drawing gut votes instead of votes backed up by reason?
Iammars wrote:Blackberry, if a cop claims with a guilty on someone, and the cop appears sane, who wouldn't want to vote that person?Blackberry wrote:BOOKITTY-- mafia knew that Niv wasn't a scum and so would easily agree with that lynch and would blame the lynch on me, so why not go after that?
How is that a HYPOTHETICAL situation? It is a REAL situation. Monkey, someone that did NOT appear sane, posted an investigation on me and Xtoxm. Why would you make a "hypothetical" situation?!Iammars wrote:I'm sorry. I wasn't talking about Monkey's investigation of you. I was posing a hypothetical situation which was meant to parallel your fake claim.Blackberry wrote:Iammars, I love you, but you are also a d$!*a$$ ...
A: The cop's NAME clearly indicated he is f**king insane/paranoid
B: I wouldn't vote him--given evidence on Day One about Godfather and the fact that the Cop got me as a guilty and I know I'm not scum.
bahahahahahahaha. I'm not going to dignify this with an answer. You're obviously too lazy to look for anything that might possibly prove you wrong.farside22 wrote:In all the post I just reread from you not once have you tried to find scum or attempted to justify a vote you made.
bahahahahahahaha. I'm not going to dignify this with an answer. You're obviously too lazy to look for anything that might possibly prove you wrong.farside22 wrote:It was all agreement with others and not much offered in any way shape or form.
That post was formed over a number of days. I'm not surprised that you think it's suspicious - literally every word out of my mouth is a scumtell in your eyes. Take off the blinkers.farside22 wrote:Plus when you come on to say you were busy after being gone for a week (lets say a week) you just said you were busy, but came on with enough time to place a vote? That in it's self looks suspicious.
This is not defending yourself. Show where I am wrong.Cyberbob wrote:bahahahahahahaha. I'm not going to dignify this with an answer. You're obviously too lazy to look for anything that might possibly prove you wrong.farside22 wrote:In all the post I just reread from you not once have you tried to find scum or attempted to justify a vote you made.
bahahahahahahaha. I'm not going to dignify this with an answer. You're obviously too lazy to look for anything that might possibly prove you wrong.farside22 wrote:It was all agreement with others and not much offered in any way shape or form.
That post was formed over a number of days. I'm not surprised that you think it's suspicious - literally every word out of my mouth is a scumtell in your eyes. Take off the blinkers.farside22 wrote:Plus when you come on to say you were busy after being gone for a week (lets say a week) you just said you were busy, but came on with enough time to place a vote? That in it's self looks suspicious.
I quite agree. Don't just say she's wrong, Cyberbob. Showfarside22 wrote:This is not defending yourself. Show where I am wrong.Cyberbob wrote:bahahahahahahaha. I'm not going to dignify this with an answer. You're obviously too lazy to look for anything that might possibly prove you wrong.farside22 wrote:In all the post I just reread from you not once have you tried to find scum or attempted to justify a vote you made.
bahahahahahahaha. I'm not going to dignify this with an answer. You're obviously too lazy to look for anything that might possibly prove you wrong.farside22 wrote:It was all agreement with others and not much offered in any way shape or form.
That post was formed over a number of days. I'm not surprised that you think it's suspicious - literally every word out of my mouth is a scumtell in your eyes. Take off the blinkers.farside22 wrote:Plus when you come on to say you were busy after being gone for a week (lets say a week) you just said you were busy, but came on with enough time to place a vote? That in it's self looks suspicious.
The part of Iammars thoughts I am attacking is the following:Twomz wrote:1) Cyberbob, don't you mean blinders instead of blinkers?
2) And I'm sorry, I hate that kind of case too, I just haven't seen anything else with all of Blackberry's distractions.
3) Blackberry, in another game, if a cop comes forward with guilty on day one, don't you lynch the person with the guilty just to see if he's telling the truth/insane/paranoid? That's the hypothetical Iammars is talking about. Except, there is no sanity issues for trackers, you only have to worry about gravediggers (seen as targeting the person who dies every night... kind of a miller).
4) Generic listed point.
The cop did not appear sane,...if a cop claims with a guilty on someone,and the cop appears sane...
Blackberry wrote:The part of Iammars thoughts I am attacking is the following:
The cop did not appear sane,...if a cop claims with a guilty on someone,and the cop appears sane...given his role nameit was quite clear he was obviously paranoid or insane.