Yeah I'm with you on that!zeddicus wrote:hello everyone. lets start off with avote:thevampireofdusseldorf.
that name is much too long.
No offence Vampire-completely random. Sorry.
Like i said, it was my fault for not reading the thread properly- I didnt realise it was only one vote and one FoS, otherwise I would not have over reacted.Pink Puppy wrote:Mozsuggs... you're actually starting to make me laugh!
But I have to ask again, if you are familiar with bandwagoning, why did you freak out when you had one vote and one FOS on you? I would think someone who knows what a bandwagon is, wouldn't get so upset if it happens to them (not that it did happen to you... but you get it, right?).
Nah, i love this game- i guess though i have been playing a few games on another site, where i m better known, and they get my sense of humour (such as it is).QuantumFruit wrote:@mozsuggs: Do you just not like this game in general? (I refer mainly to post 178.) If that's the case, why on earth are you playing?
And you're a strange one, dear - I've been posting quite a bit. Does my being absent since Monday really merit a vote? (You said "if I don't hear something from QF", etc.)
--
Also, is no one weirded out by the fact that he basically said "I'm voting QF because I'm bandwagoning."?
And the hypocrisy of saying vikingfan is talking bollocks and not thinking this through? Was that meant to be ironic, because he really doesn't compare next to him.
--
In short, mozsuggs advocates bandwagoning, says he won't defend himself because it's unnecessary and then does, says he's clearly town, and throws his votes and FOS-es out like candy.
Vote: mozsuggs
I assume you saw my previous post?vikingfan wrote:2 scum? how on earth do you know that? 3 is generally accepted but there can always be more or less. but yes, there's generally MORE than two, but that's not a hard and fast rule.
Explain that very quickly because I don't like where you're going.
Don't be patronising, it makes you look dumb.Cephrir wrote:Probably three, actually. No more likely an attempt to confirm himself by not knowing how many scum there are (might seem like a good idea to a newbie) than that it's legitimately not knowing.Obviously there are only two scum!-use your loaf!
Could I ask you to do something for me? Go back to my post. See it there? 193? Now,It struck me Cephir that you have been fairly keen to lynch someone through out-of course that doesn't mean your scum (i wanted a lynch too,, remember) -but you have to go on something.actually read what I typed.
Thanks!
well, maybe i was wrong-it just seemed to me you put pressure on afew people to vite, and i guess you did put pressureon 3 people (i havent checked, but i am assuming you voted for someone else in the random stage). What you say seems fair enough.Cephrir wrote:Try reading this part again. After you do, respond to it. After that, if you still think I'm scum, you're going to have to give some different reasons because the only ones you listed were false.Yes, I've read what you type.
If what you say is true then great!
But maybe you're scum-who knows!Also, your continued assault on vikingfan for no apparent reason other than his vote on you is noted.Cephrir wrote:Explain how I've been "desperate to get a lynch", because I'm pretty sure I have no idea what you're talking about or how my actions could possibly construed that way. I've made two votes outside of the random phase. First, for windkirby for being defensive, and iirc, he had no votes at the time. but I later decided overdefensiveness wasn't the greatest tell and he was reacting in a fairly protown way. I am now voting for you, and at the time it was for pressure, and you had zero votes on you. Your recent posts have definiely justified my vote, so it's staying there.
If you can explain to me how hunting scum and voting for people who happen to not have any votes is desperate, I'll eat my hat. And I'm so confident you won't be able to that I'm not even wearing a hat.
Thats not a very effective method of communication mate.Cephrir wrote:Dang ninjas.
Thank you.well, maybe i was wrong-it just seemed to me you put pressure on afew people to vite
1) Obviously, I can't read everyone perfectly.I suspect your mistake, looking at your phrase (about windkirby) that he reacted in "a fairly pro town way" might be that you stereo type too much.
Because it seems like you think i am not reacting in a "pro town way"-and yet i am pro town!
2) Actually, I'm thinking you're town, actually. I just didn't bother telling you because you'd feel more pressure that way.
Here's a hint. If you don't think someone's scum, don't vote for them. And if you have no idea who to vote for, don't vote.I dont really think you are scum, its just you seemed as good as bet as any.
AS i ma town, your entire argument was wrong.Cephrir wrote:I appear to be winning this argument, so it doesn't work that badly, eh? Although the main reason I'm winning this argument is because I'm so right that nobody could ever lose it from my side...mozsuggs wrote:Just trying to help you. if you werent so agressive, you would win more arguments-basic rules of sophistry and debating-no one likes the kid who tries to throw his weight around-he normally ends up on the floor.
Mm. Maybe my gut reads are writing off newb behavior as "newb town" without considering the "newb scum" possibility.vikingfan wrote:I agree 100% with what Yvonne says about not letting newb behavior slide just because it's newb.
Vanilla claim equals not convincing. Maybe people would believe you if you didn't do things like bandwagon for the sake of bandwaggoning.mozsuggs wrote:The even more bad news, for me, is that i am avanilla townie. Not a cop. So you prob dont lose too much by losing me.
The worst news of all is that no one believes me *pathetic sobbing*
Please, don't let that be the lesson you take away from this game. Once you become a better player, this won't be an issue.mozsuggs wrote:If i've learned anything, its not to post-i was doing ok until i opened my mouth. Now i see why pople submarine.
Unvote. I'm feeling really ambivolent toward the mozsuggs wagon, I've been reading him as newb town for a while now but, as I said, I think I've been attributing all newb behavior as newb town. The votes are gathering and I need to think about this.
Hmm unpleasant and dumb, eh? An attractive combination. i have no more senseless bandwagon votes than you my dear syphillis, (are we both 3 bandwagons each-i'm tired and its late, but its roughly the same for each of us). i dont know what cases you are refering to -i have rebutted your hopeless arguments one by one in fairly short order.Cephrir wrote:Wow. I've seen some pretty bad arguments from you, but "you're wrong" definitely takes the cake.mozsuggs wrote:AS i ma town, your entire argument was wrong.
Okay, now you're just lying. Your defenses have been crap if one would say that they evenzedd, i dont think you've been following. i made numerous attempts to defend my position, in numerous ways, but when i got minus 2 from a lynhc i thought i'd claim.existed, and I don't think I would.
I was unsure of mozsuggs' alignment. I'm still a bit hesitant, but I'm pretty sure we've caught ourselves a scum. I've been reading his wanting to get to night as either scum or a power role, and he's claimed vanilla. If mozsuggs is a townie, which I doubt, he's a really horrendous townie and utterly useless anyways, given that he won't respond to cases and does nothing but proclaim "I'm town", add senseless bandwagon votes that only help the scum, and throw hissy fits when people build cases on him while still pretending he's the one on the moral high ground. He's obviously going to get lynched eventually regardless of his alignment, and since I'm pretty sure that alignment isn't a town one anyways,Its funny really-everyone has disected my arguments, often quite logically, and yet you are still going to get the wrong guy-good for scum, bad for town.
Hence why i got to my (as you say, not very logical) "Fuck off, I'm innocent"-cos thats all it boils down to, in the end.
Vote: mozsuggs
Good night, syphillis-hope the toen catch you , and we win-i'll have a good laugh.Cephrir wrote:Ninja'd by an idiot. How embarrassing.
1) I've been on 2. And neither was a bandwagon when I originally voted on it, I started the wk thing and was the first on you.Hmm unpleasant and dumb, eh? An attractive combination. i have no more senseless bandwagon votes than you my dear syphillis, (are we both 3 bandwagons each-i'm tired and its late, but its roughly the same for each of us).
2) Mine are not senseless, they were based on logic. You admitted at the time that you had no reason. Don't even try to make it sound like the same thing.
One of the most hilarious things I've ever read in a mafia game. No, seriously.i dont know what cases you are refering to -i have rebutted your hopeless arguments one by one in fairly short order.