...
...
...
...
Blackberry wrote:Plus there is an ebil cult going around. I got invite last night but rejected it .
Blackberry wrote:hasdgfas wrote:BB, I sincerely hope that was a sick, twisted joke. Otherwise, not only do we have to deal with scum such as Cyberbob, we have to deal with the cult.
if anyone is in the cult, please say so now so that we can figure this out? It would be much appreciated
Curious George is in the cult, along with the coated-man.
How many times did I have to say that xtomx wasn't the lynch to satisfy you? I was one of the few who stated after his claim that he shouldn't be lynched and FOS'ed those who did. I think you stating I didn't do enough for him not to be lynched is BS. It seems like you are focused more on those who didn't do anything or vote against him then focus on those who ingored him and still voted against him.armlx wrote:Farside: While you are anti-xtoxm lynch, your defenses feel really weak and wishy washy. For example, the long analysis of everyone on the Niv wagon you post about 20 scummy things about him then just say you have a "Gut feeling" he isn't scum.
As for why my opinion changed, I have stated this. Yesterday I wasn't so suspect of CO, then I reread over night, became suspicious, looked at interactions, and started putting 2 and 2 together.
I'm curious to know how reading this Porochaz gets Gorrad as being scummie and saying he is over reacting. I really don't see that in the post.Porochaz wrote:Gorrad wrote:Then tell me, sir, why Cyberbob was NOT on THE LIST yesterday?armlx wrote:Oh, btw, Cyberbob and Gorrad are looking like a good pair of scum. Scum like to put scum partners at #2 on their lists to show reasonable suspicion yet still give them a reason not to bus a buddy.
Well that doesnt really matter, there could be plenty of reasons the point is he's on your list now and not back then... I didn't find you putting Cyberbob at no. 2 scummy, but you seem to over react here with a crap point that doesn't prove anything
vote Gorrad
You're kidding, right? I attacked Farside22 pretty hard for his day 1 doctor is dead tell? Let's go back and see my attack on Farside22:armlx wrote:As for the connection between you and CO, he appeared to attack you fairly hard for the D1 doc is dead tell.
That's it. That's all I posted in regards to it. How is that attacking? I just wanted somewhere to put my vote.ChaosOmega wrote:Vote farside22
Hardly. Farside was developing a wagon at the time, and CO himself even admitted it wasn't random. In fact, the part it was his first post is one of the things I found strange, as it was a perfect distancing opportunity.Iammars wrote:
@armlx: Are you seriously attacking someone for their first in-game post? It's very clear that that post was a random vote.
Porochaz wrote:The NOT I think implies over reaction... also the tone of this sentence suggest he is annoyed over armlx's statement when I don't personally think it was that major a point...Then tell me, sir, why Cyberbob was NOT on THE LIST yesterday?