Mini 554 - Mafia in Vollville - Over!!

ChaosOmega · Post Post #275 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:45 pm

vote: opie

=======================================

Votecount #11

opie - 4 (Adel, Oman, Guardian, ChaosOmega)

Guardian - 2 (opie, Incognito)
Oman - 1 (Jitsu)
Xyltixlm - 1 (Matt_S)
TrustGossip - 1 (pickemgenius)
Jitsu - 1 (Erg0)
Matt_S - 1 (Xylthixlm)

Not voting - 1 (TrustGossip)

With 12 alive, it's 7 to lynch.
Deadline for D1: Saturday March 1, 10:55AM GMT+10
=======================================

pickemgenius · Post Post #276 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:47 pm

opie wrote:Guardian, why are you not motivated to respond to Incognito?

opie why are you not reading?

pickemgenius · Post Post #277 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:48 pm

pickemgenius wrote:
opie wrote:Guardian, why are you not motivated to respond to Incognito?
opie why are you not motivated to read

silly EBWOP: ^^^^^^^^

Incognito · Post Post #278 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:51 pm

Erg0 wrote:
Adel wrote:
Guardian wrote:
Incognito wrote:
Adel wrote:
Incognito wrote:Stop being so ignorant and thick-headed.
I'd advise against being intentionally insulting if you want to make friends or influence people in the future.

Adel wrote:100% bullshit is more like it.
Oh. I guess you're not the insulting type.

P.S. I'm not here to be your "friend". I'm here to play Mafia.
I've seen a scum say this like 3 times and never a townie.
WOULD YOU MIND LINKING TO ALL THREE SO WE DON'T HAVE TO TAKE YOU AT YOUR WORD?
Now you sound like Incognito.

I strongly object to this.

Erg0 · Post Post #279 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:53 pm

I was referring to your post 99 (not the caps).

opie · Post Post #280 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:54 pm

pickemgenius, again, what are you talking about?

And ChaosOmega, should I expect more thoughts regarding your vote?

Incognito · Post Post #281 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 12:54 pm

Ah, okay. Carry on then. =)

pickemgenius · Post Post #282 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:05 pm

opie wrote:pickemgenius, again, what are you talking about?

I said it would be nice of you to read. Now do it please.
kthx

opie · Post Post #283 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:21 pm

I just really don't understand all of this attitude in this game.

Not that I want to humor you any further pickemgenius, but is there something in particular I should be reading.

pickemgenius · Post Post #284 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:24 pm

you should be reading Guardians response to Incognito please.

opie · Post Post #285 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:45 pm

[i]In Post 241[/i] Guardian wrote:I am not particularly motivated to respond to Incognito's case on me.

and again

[i]In Post 270[/i] Guardian wrote:I'm not motivated to respond to a post Incog made *in this game*. You think I'm going to look through all my old games and all the games I've read and find what I'm talking about? lolz.

This is what I've read. And I want to know why. Why is he not motivate to respond to Incognito's case? I feel the case is pretty substantial and except for a confusing point he made in Post 225 Guardian has completely ignored. If there is something I am missing pickemgenius, could you please just be up front and point it out.

Guardian · Post Post #286 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:47 pm

opie wrote:Guardian, why are you not motivated to respond to Incognito?

I thought no one would ever ask.

I'm busy, and many of his points are correct. I've followed Adel a lot. I ask many questions. I disagree that those things are indicative of my being scum, but I can't refute the facts. Also, while I don't find his case convincing, I think it would take quite a bit of time to respond to in sufficient depth to come anywhere near refuting.

Defenses are overrated anyway. Especially since not many are convinced by Incognito, and he is "100% sure" I am scum, I don't see how it would be a valuable expenditure of my time and effort to make arguments that aren't going to change many people's minds about anything. About 3 people have an inclination I'm scum right now, and I don't think responding to Incognito's case would do much, possibly reducing the number suspicious of me to 2 people from 3.

My time is much more valuably spent trying to find scum right now.

Guardian · Post Post #287 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:49 pm

pickemgenius wrote:you should be reading Guardians response to Incognito please.

Hmm. Interesting that PEG should say this. What response, sir? We may have found a better lynch candidate, yet.

Prima facia (at first glance) it seems like this is PEG blatantly buddying to me, siding with me in opposition to opie.

FOS: PEG

Incognito · Post Post #288 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:54 pm

ChaosOmega, in post 275, wrote:
vote: opie

ChaosOmega, you gonna explain that vote or what?

Adel · Post Post #289 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:55 pm

Guardian wrote:
opie wrote:Guardian, why are you not motivated to respond to Incognito?
I thought no one would ever ask.

I'm busy, and many of his points are correct. I've followed Adel a lot. I ask many questions. I disagree that those things are indicative of my being scum, but I can't refute the facts. Also, while I don't find his case convincing, I think it would take quite a bit of time to respond to in sufficient depth to come anywhere near refuting.

Defenses are overrated anyway. Especially since not many are convinced by Incognito, and he is "100% sure" I am scum, I don't see how it would be a valuable expenditure of my time and effort to make arguments that aren't going to change many people's minds about anything. About 3 people have an inclination I'm scum right now, and I don't think responding to Incognito's case would do much, possibly reducing the number suspicious of me to 2 people from 3.

My time is much more valuably spent trying to find scum right now.

I think he is right and that we should all support him

pickemgenius · Post Post #290 (ISO) » Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:10 pm

Reading is overrated. Seeing Incogs quotes in Guardians post threw my mind in a clusterfuck. Add that with my general bad day pissed off attitude and you get a receipe for wtf.

Oman · Post Post #291 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:20 am

I dislike the FoS on PEG by Guardian.

opie · Post Post #292 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 5:37 am

[i]In Post 276[/i] pickemgenius wrote:opie why are you not reading?

[i]In Post 282[/i] pickemgenius wrote:I said it would be nice of you to read. Now do it please.
kthx

[i]In Post 284[/i] pickemgenius wrote:you should be reading Guardians response to Incognito please.

[i]In Post 290[/i] pickemgenius wrote:Reading is overrated.

I don't know what to say about this anymore. So I'm not going to say anything.

Guardian · Post Post #293 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 9:53 am

ChaosOmega saying anything at all would be great.

Oman, you disapprove of PEG being FOS'd?

Oman · Post Post #294 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:38 pm

Ya, I don't know if its the right thing, but its for the wrong reasons.

pickemgenius · Post Post #295 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 12:43 pm

ooh i got fos'd!

i didn't know anybody actually kept track of those things.

as per my message in my other game.

if not tonight then fo sho to mo. i'm stuck in a bit of a rut atm.

Adel · Post Post #296 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:09 pm

FoS: PEG

because I like to bandwagon with Guardian.

Erg0 · Post Post #297 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:10 pm

No more mind meld?

Adel · Post Post #298 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 1:17 pm

Erg0 wrote:No more mind meld?

more like two fingers are better than one because two fingers can cross and that makes a big

X

and

X

is s

X

e is like peg, right?

Xylthixlm · Post Post #299 (ISO) » Thu Feb 14, 2008 3:53 pm

Matt_S wrote:Xylthixlm: What exactly is bad about my logic?

Well, before I can explain that, I'd have to

understand

your logic. And I'm afraid my mind doesn't bend that far.

Instead, how about you explain your logic better, and then I'll tell you why it's wrong.