Thespival Mafia (Denouement)

petroleumjelly · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:30 am

What a strange set of interactions. This is in chronological order, all on this page.

1.)

Monkey, Post 612 and 613 wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:An alt of who?
Nanookthewolf

2.)

Sarcastro, Post 614 wrote:Anyway, I finally remembered to read the rest of the game. It was kind of a waste of time, really.

3.)

Sarcastro, Post 623 wrote:Also, Monkey is probably just newbie-town, but he's still really annoying me right now.

4.)

Monkey, Post 624 wrote:
Sarcastro wrote:Anyway, I finally remembered to read the rest of the game. It was kind of a waste of time, really.

Unvote: Sarcastro

~~~~~

So, a couple questions.

--> Sarcastro:

A.)

If you read the game, how did you miss the entire

discussion

on Monkey being an alt, as well as him

claiming

to be an alt the set of double posts directly

before

you claimed to have read the game?

B.)

Does the fact that Monkey is NanooktheWolf change your opinion on him?

--> Monkey

A.)

Why did you unvote Sarcastro for "reading the game" when it is clear he has

not

read the game by having called you a "newbie"?

Talitha · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:37 am

Monkey is Nanook?!?!?

Just popping in to say that I am currently reading over from the start. My next post WILL be an up-to-speed contribution, as should all my posts from now on. Thanks for the patience.

petroleumjelly · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:07 am

Mod

, wolfcrier voted RossWilliam in Post 580.

I find it curious that RossWilliam has attained a bandwagon, but

not

wolfcrier. It seems like comments on wolfcrier slip off like acid on a duck (random Far Side reference) in terms of how well the town seems to react to it, but any note on RossWilliam equates to somebody voting for him. Is there any particular reason for this?

For those of you voting RossWilliam, please explain to me why you are voting for him – and then explain to me why you are voting RossWilliam over wolfcrier.

Iammars · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 10:19 am

PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:and jester claim now please, we can't lynch you.

Why would you think he would claim?

hasdgfas wrote:Amen!

Amen!

al_kohaulec wrote:Sarc claimed he agrees with Pooky for now. Not that just that is a good reason, but it's definitely not claiming for no reason at all.

They're basically the same thing. The implication in Sarc's quote was that he was just following Pooky blindly until he caught up with the game, which is basically just picking a player at random.

MeMe wrote:vote: Sarcastro

Oh shoot. Now BM thinks I'm dumb.

LOL.

Talitha wrote:Just checking in to see who didn't survive the night.

Boo.

Minor tell here.

al_kohaulec wrote:MeMe, I haven't noticed her as being very active, almost seeming to post without posting. I haven't been impressed with her play. There are possible excuses for it, but generally her play hasn't seemed as strong as MeMe's play typically should be IMO.

Everyone's aloud to have a bad game every once in a while.

al_kohaulec wrote:I'm not sure, but I think Ross first made my list for being scummy when I noticed him jumping on top of the attacks towards GS and Iammers.

Grr...

Mastermind of Sin wrote:Anyone in favor of forgoing lynches and just NKing people until the jester claims?

I'd be in favor of it if a vigilante claims.

tyhess wrote:Anyone in favor of forgoing lynches and just NKing people until the jester claims?

Are you serious? That'd be cool.

Monkey wrote:Nanookthewolf

Holy crap...

Monkey wrote:Now in light of Tyhess's claim, and no counter as of yet .. I'm sticking with my vote for now.

Why would someone counterclaim?

Captain Bandwagon · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:42 pm

pj, my bet's on that both RW and wolfcrier are scum, and they're bussing. It doesn't really matter which one of them we shoot for, my vote is equally fine on either.

tyhess · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:56 pm

I didn't say this:

Anyone in favor of forgoing lynches and just NKing people until the jester claims?

wolfcrier · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 2:59 pm

Well if you all feel that way can you please vote me so I can stop checking in to see that two people have the guts to vote me while no one else is willing to take action. It seems pretty anti-town for you all to stick with RW after all this and not vote me after SO much logic pj and hasdgfas (or however its spelled) has made against me.

Captain Bandwagon · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 3:43 pm

wolfcrier wrote:Well if you all feel that way can you please vote me so I can stop checking in to see that two people have the guts to vote me while no one else is willing to take action. It seems pretty anti-town for you all to stick with RW after all this and not vote me after SO much logic pj and hasdgfas (or however its spelled) has made against me.

I

hate

posts like this so much.

al_kohaulec · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:01 pm

wolfcrier wrote:Well if you all feel that way can you please vote me so I can stop checking in to see that two people have the guts to vote me while no one else is willing to take action. It seems pretty anti-town for you all to stick with RW after all this and not vote me after SO much logic pj and hasdgfas (or however its spelled) has made against me.

Why would you want us to vote for you?

Sarcastro · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:10 pm

petroleumjelly wrote:
A.)
If you read the game, how did you miss the entire
discussion
on Monkey being an alt, as well as him
claiming
to be an alt the set of double posts directly
before
you claimed to have read the game?

Well sorry, Mr. I-never-get-bored-and-start-skimming.

petroleumjelly wrote:
B.)
Does the fact that Monkey is NanooktheWolf change your opinion on him?

Yeah, I guess. We can lynch him today instead of RW if you want.

Sarcastro · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:11 pm

While we're on the subject, of whom is Captain Bandwagon an alt?

hasdgfas · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:27 pm

vote: wolfcrier

tyhess · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 4:42 pm

ok now that wolfcrier has said that I feel like I have to go back on my jester claim, because I am not the jester, and he might be. The reason that I claimed was that I thought if I claimed that I could get the real jester to counterclaim, which would be productive. I was figuring I would have more leeway to claim and then unclaim since I was already the cult of the couch. It (obviously) did not go as I planned, but I think wolfcrier is the jester at this point.

Sarcastro · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 5:21 pm

You should be shot on principle.

Talitha · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:47 pm

When I was scum and playing in a game with a jester (at Thespival), I remember (subtly) trying to get people to think I might be the jester, so they would not want to lynch me.

Just throwing that out there...

*goes back to burying head in the depths of page 13*

Battle Mage · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 12:58 am

Sarcastro wrote:You should be shot on principle.

qft.

Battle Mage · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:03 am

petroleumjelly wrote:
Mod
, wolfcrier voted RossWilliam in Post 580.

I find it curious that RossWilliam has attained a bandwagon, but
not
wolfcrier. It seems like comments on wolfcrier slip off like acid on a duck (random Far Side reference) in terms of how well the town seems to react to it, but any note on RossWilliam equates to somebody voting for him. Is there any particular reason for this?

For those of you voting RossWilliam, please explain to me why you are voting for him – and then explain to me why you are voting RossWilliam over wolfcrier.

Ross William is exceptionally scummy, and yet not in such a way as he could be Jester. Wolfcrier is an obvious candidate for Jester. Pretty simple really.

BM

Battle Mage · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 1:05 am

Iammars wrote:
PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:and jester claim now please, we can't lynch you.
Why would you think he would claim?

hasdgfas wrote:Amen!
Amen!

al_kohaulec wrote:Sarc claimed he agrees with Pooky for now. Not that just that is a good reason, but it's definitely not claiming for no reason at all.
They're basically the same thing. The implication in Sarc's quote was that he was just following Pooky blindly until he caught up with the game, which is basically just picking a player at random.

MeMe wrote:vote: Sarcastro

Oh shoot. Now BM thinks I'm dumb.
LOL.

Talitha wrote:Just checking in to see who didn't survive the night.

Boo.
Minor tell here.

al_kohaulec wrote:MeMe, I haven't noticed her as being very active, almost seeming to post without posting. I haven't been impressed with her play. There are possible excuses for it, but generally her play hasn't seemed as strong as MeMe's play typically should be IMO.
Everyone's aloud to have a bad game every once in a while.

al_kohaulec wrote:I'm not sure, but I think Ross first made my list for being scummy when I noticed him jumping on top of the attacks towards GS and Iammers.
Grr...

Mastermind of Sin wrote:Anyone in favor of forgoing lynches and just NKing people until the jester claims?
I'd be in favor of it if a vigilante claims.

tyhess wrote:Anyone in favor of forgoing lynches and just NKing people until the jester claims?
Are you serious? That'd be cool.

Monkey wrote:Nanookthewolf
Holy crap...

Monkey wrote:Now in light of Tyhess's claim, and no counter as of yet .. I'm sticking with my vote for now.
Why would someone counterclaim?

Interesting post. Some responses are good, some are weak. But the most noticeable trend is that you are analysing perhaps the most obscure set of posts in the game. Id say you could be far more productive than this if you put your mind to it.

BM

tyhess · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 3:56 am

Sarcastro wrote:You should be shot on principle.

And if it was up to me you would be shot on priniciple in every game becasue no matter matter you act anti town.

Battle Mage · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:12 am

tyhess wrote:
Sarcastro wrote:You should be shot on principle.
And if it was up to me you would be shot on priniciple in every game becasue no matter matter you act anti town.

Anti-town is probably the wrong term. you mean 'like an arrogant twat'. But in fairness, it is you who is in the wrong here. It helps the town alot to know that only Scum or the actual Jester are going to claim Jester. If you are town, and claim Jester, it really fecks up a foolproof scumhunting strategy, and your logic was so poor to boot.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:42 am

dammit tyhess.....that was either a brillant move or an an idiotic move.

unvote RossWilliams

, now I cant be sure his horrid play is not purposeful

Talitha wrote:When I was scum and playing in a game with a jester (at Thespival), I remember (subtly) trying to get people to think I might be the jester, so they would not want to lynch me.

Just throwing that out there...

*goes back to burying head in the depths of page 13*

so what the hell does that mean for this game? We know tyhess is the recruiter. Why does this feel like posting to make it look like you are (finally) contributing more than you really all..

fos Talitha

, this will turn into a vote very soon if you dont post and contribute.

Battle Mage · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 5:55 am

i agree with CKD to an extent. Talitha seems to just be posting the obvious. Anyone who has played Jester Mafia can tell you that ffs.

BM

Monkey · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 8:55 am

petroleumjelly wrote:--> Monkey

A.)
Why did you unvote Sarcastro for "reading the game" when it is clear he has
not
read the game by having called you a "newbie"?

I'm pretty much over it at this point I think. I took a glance at a game or two of sarcastro's and noted that his behavior in them doesn't really differ from his behavior here. Let him believe that I'm a newbie if he likes.

I'm very confused as to why Tyhess would claim jester evern after his explanation of making a trap. It's only confusing because if another player did counter claim the role, then what would happen?

Fos: Tyhess

which I'm tempted to change to a vote depending on the response if given.

tyhess · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:14 am

I would have just said that I lied and that the other dude was the true jester....it's basically the same kind of thing all of the other players were trying to do day one....

Battle Mage · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Sun Feb 03, 2008 11:42 am

tyhess wrote:I would have just said that I lied and that the other dude was the true jester....it's basically the same kind of thing all of the other players were trying to do day one....

you think the Jester would COUNTERCLAIM?

are you retardedly dumb?

*excuse my anger, im tired and grouchy*

BM