Mini 528 - Nervous Mafia (Game Over)

[HurriKaty]

I have to wonder, Flameaxe, exactly which topic is "noobish." You didn't really specify.

Also, I love myself too. Because I'm hot.

[Yosarian2]

W..wow. Y..yesterday l...lasted, what, 3 r...realtime days? I n...never even had a chance to post, heh. W...what was t...that about?

You're right, it was quick, but the wagon was a good one. If I had the opportunity, I would vote for Gorrad again. That said, it's literally impossible for there to be no scum on the wagon (it's currently 4-3-2). We need to hit the other scumgroup soon, but the only current difference between the two should be on the DGB wagon, but Gorrad was my best bet for that. I still think you're fairly likely dgbscumbuddy, but eh.

First of all, W...what do you mean the "gorrad w...wagon was a g...good one?"

And I...I'm still c...confused about w...why you're ac...cuusing me of being DGB's s...scumbuddy. I w...was voting for h...her for most of the d..day. I l...left her w...wagon for a l..little while to vote f...flameaxe, but t...then my n...next s...several po...posts were demands she e...explain herself on s...several p...points, and when sh...she re...refused, I v...voted for her a..again p...putting her at, what, -2 or s..something, and c...continued to p...push for her l...lynch un...until she d..died. I t...thought I did q...quite a good job of p..pressuring her q...questions sh...she ap...app...apparently couldn't answer.

[Andycyca]

Shanba, why whould you vote for Gorrad again? (apart from the fact that he's already dead)

[Shanba]

Shanba, why whould you vote for Gorrad again? (apart from the fact that he's already dead)

Because I believe I had several legitimate, strong scumtells on him, he was completely failing to provide any adequate defence and he was sending my scumdar through the roof. I'm nit often certain people are scum, but I was certain Gorrad was scum. Every other time, I've been right. /me shrugs. Perhaps I ought to rephrase that: if I saw someone perform teh actions that Gorrad did, again, I would vote him again.

Yos: I believe I've already mentioned that I disliked the fact that you defended her day 1 against some fairly meaningless stuff. Yes, you were voting her most of the day, but as far as I can see, you just left a random vote on her. It's only Dec 08, the sixth vote on teh wagon, where you actually seem to be serious about your vote. And then the reason you give is that she failed to answer a question. No, I think it's definitely likely that you were bussing.

As I said, though, we have other fish to fry. Specifically, Elmo. For the past two days, he's just been voting on the wagons and keeping the lynches rolling. This reads pretty strongly other scumgroup: dgbscum need to lynch otherscum, so they would be more active in their scumhunting efforts.

Vote: Elmo

[Yosarian2]

Yos: I believe I've already mentioned that I disliked the fact that you defended her day 1 against some fairly meaningless stuff.

(shrug) If anyone makes a bad argument, even against a person I otherwise suspect, I will generally tend to point out that it's a bad argument. However, I would think the fact that I was still voting for while I pointed that out should show I was never really trying to "defend" her, so much as just trying to keep it on a logical basis.

Yes, you were voting her most of the day, but as far as I can see, you just left a random vote on her.

FYI, I would never leave a random vote on a growing bandwagon accidently. I left my vote there because I distrusted her and wanted her to be pressured.

It's only Dec 08, the sixth vote on teh wagon, where you actually seem to be serious about your vote. And then the reason you give is that she failed to answer a question. No, I think it's definitely likely that you were bussing.

How does that follow? I was suspicious of her actions, so I asked her several questions about them in order to try to figure out what she was thinking, to find out what her alignment is. I generally like to ask questions first and vote afterwards; people tend to be more willing to answer questions when they understand there's a threat you might vote for them soon but haven't actually done so yet. And then, she completly refused to answer my questions, which in my opinion is one of the best scumtells there is.

This is all pretty standard scum-hunting techniques for me, designed to force the person I'm suspicious of to respond to me in a way that will help me determine their alignment; when someone acts in a way that might be suspicious, I often start with simple questions, and then ratchet up the pressure from there, until the person either starts to respond to me and I start to get a better feel for their alignment, or else the person refuses to respond to me and dies, which is also fine IMHO because anyone who would rather die then respond to questions is probably scum anyway. That's the key to effective pressure of any type, is you have to be willing to kill the person if necessary, if you're not willing to do that, then it's not effective pressure. She's hardly the first scum I've caught this way, either. I fail to see how any of this is supposed to mean I was "bussing" her.

[HurriKaty]

Shanba, why whould you vote for Gorrad again? (apart from the fact that he's already dead)

Because I believe I had several legitimate, strong scumtells on him, he was completely failing to provide any adequate defence and he was sending my scumdar through the roof. I'm nit often certain people are scum, but I was certain Gorrad was scum. Every other time, I've been right. /me shrugs. Perhaps I ought to rephrase that: if I saw someone perform teh actions that Gorrad did, again, I would vote him again.

Makes enough sense, I guess. I would have to have said the same thing about DGB if she had turned up town.

But only I am sexy enough to be town. Only me.

[Flameaxe]

I love you people. Except the scum, I love you more.

[Yosarian2]

c...c...crap, sorry Mod, I f..f...forgot my post r...restriction last post.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Vote: Shanba

[Andycyca]

Makes, sense Shanba.

KScope's vote doesn't

[UltimaAvalon]

c...c...crap, sorry Mod, I f..f...forgot my post r...restriction last post.

We know. We're deciding your fate.

PS: UA loves you
PPS: UA loves money

[ZONEACE]

We know. We're deciding your fate.

PS: UA loves you
PPS: UA loves money

you know else loves money?

[ZONEACE]

We know. We're deciding your fate.

PS: UA loves you
PPS: UA loves money

you know else loves money?

it's hookers in case you weren't sure.

[UltimaAvalon]

We know. We're deciding your fate.

PS: UA loves you
PPS: UA loves money

you know else loves money?

it's hookers in case you weren't sure.

I thought it was love

for

money

[HurriKaty]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]

Vote: Shanba

[/quote]

You know, you'd think you could put a little more detail into that post.

I mean, god crafted enough detail into my fine, chiseled good looks.

[Andycyca]

I think it's the first time I completely agree with Katy

I mean 100%

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

He is a good lynch.

[HurriKaty]

[quote="KaleiÐoscøpe"]He is a good lynch.[/quote]

Because that post is just as detailed as the last one in your reasoning.

For the love of everything, I make a lot of filler posts, but at least when I vote I give reasoning.

Because I'm honestly too pretty not to.

[ZONEACE]

vote kscope

can we just end this?

[Yosarian2]

Y...y..Yeah, Kalei is certanly a r...re...reasonable sus...suspect. All h...h..he's been d...d...doing for m...m...much of the ga...game is ma...making silly b...ba...ban...bandwagon votes without j...just...justificat...j...j... without reasons. H...His G...Gorrad vote y...yesterday is esp...especally s...scummy.

vote:Kaledoscope

[Elmo]

Shaba: Whatt do yo thnk of Andycyca, KScope an Flameaxe?

[Shanba]

Yeah yeah, can't handle the heat, so divert me instead?

Andy - wow. He's pretty bad too. However...

Why Pooky, Elmo? Just because Pooky suggested pseudovotes and then realvoted? Also, I'd like to read again all your reasons behind DGB's wagon.

Defence of a scumbuddy? I hate the way he tries to slip it in as a sidenote.

Why you voted yourself in the first place? Just for post restriction ease? I don't see enough guilt in DGB to vote her, though.

It would not surprise me to discover he is DGB's scumbuddy, but I'm not really after DGB's partners. Next...

Kscope - eh. Doesn't seem that unlike his normal town play. I would also note that if he were ssimply trying to keep lynches rolling (as I'm sure you're trying to get at, at this point, having chosen people on both wagons), he would not have voted me, as unlike pooky after the dgb lynch and unlike gorrad I am not an easy lynch.

Flameaxe - Again, he voted on both wagons, but again, his play is pretty typical of what I've seen from flameaxe before.

[Flameaxe]

I'm not scum. Thats all you need to know. Also, I love you all.

[scotmany12]

Praise the lord. Hallelujah. God and stuff, cause you know, God is great. If you think otherwise, well then you must be scum. Obviously. Anyways, Hallelujah! Let us all thank the lord, even though this game is quite boring. Hallelujah! Give me an amen!(not one person has yet to give me an amen, I am disappointed in all of you)

um...

[Elmo]

Shaba: Cn you see why I hav difficulty understanding your vote? I've ben on one scum wagon, one wagon I sort-of started, and one wagon tht you approve of; I'm not a shining beacon of activity, but then neither is this game in general; I've been voting on wagons, along with most of the rest of the people in the game. So I don't really get it, at the moment.

Yos: Can you outline what jumps out at you about KScope's Gorrad vote? What do you think of Flameaxe and Andy?