PIRATES v. NINJAS! Game Over!


User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
User avatar
User avatar
Mr Stoofer
Less than scum
Less than scum
Posts: 3827
Joined: February 25, 2005
Location: London Alignment: Lawful Evil

Post Post #575 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:53 am

Post by Mr Stoofer »

Vote Count


Thesp: 4 (Guardian, hasdgfas, Gorrad, Mgm)
Twomz: 3 (KaleiÐoscøpe, Thestatusquo, mikeburnfire)
Gorrad: 2 (Flameaxe, The Fonz)
Iammars: 1 (Sir Tornado)
cicero: 2 (Iammars, UltimaAvalon)
Rosso Carne: 2 (Kison, Thok)
Skruffs: 1 (Samruc)
UltimaAvalon: 1 (JordanA24)
Sir Tornado: 1 (cicero)
Guardian: 1 (Erg0)
KaleiÐoscøpe: 1 (Fritzler)

Not voting: 6 (Skruffs, Rosso Carne, MrBuddyLee, Thesp, Claus, Twomz)

13 to lynch!

Deadline will be ~12th February.

Under Rule [05], nobody would be lynched at deadline.
Last edited by Mr Stoofer on Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MrBuddyLee
MrBuddyLee
Slightly better than 50-50
User avatar
User avatar
MrBuddyLee
Slightly better than 50-50
Slightly better than 50-50
Posts: 5219
Joined: March 2, 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post Post #576 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:57 am

Post by MrBuddyLee »

If this comes across as pedantic, I apologize, but I think Gorrad needs to learn these things before he sets foot in another mafia game:
Gorrad wrote:a) faking a dayvig you do not have (I find faked roles scummy/bad play no matter the context)
The main reason not to fake an action is so you don't make people think you're scummy when you're actually town. But I'm fairly close to confirmed town, so that's not much of a risk here.

There are several reactions you could get from faking an action that would be beneficial to town.

* You could get scum to panic and make a statement they otherwise wouldn't. Town has no reason to panic--they're not lying about their beliefs and alignment.
* You could get a shoddy scumbag to make a hasty fakeclaim that would pin them in a corner later.
* You could get shoddy town to claim their role, thus getting them out of the way and allowing real scum to be pursued that day.

In my case, I absolutely accomplished one of those three, and the rest of us don't know which one it was yet. Except, in the case that there's only one scumteam...

* The hasty claim made by the townie might result in scum making hasty statements about the truthfulness of the claim.

For example, if someone is too ready to assume your township after that claim, they very well could be scum who actually DOES know you're a mason. If someone's too skeptical of your claim, they could very well be your scumpartner trying to look good by being the first to "realize" you're full of shit.

So yeah, I think your blanket assertion that all faked actions are terrible for town is utterly wrong. In a game called Mormon Missionary Mafia, at a point in the game where a lie could no longer hurt me as town, I lied and told everyone I had a self-protect that I'd be using that night. I didn't actually have a self-protect, but the lie allowed me to survive the night, perform my real night action, and help win us the game.

In the future, you may want to make a distinction between "play you don't understand" and "stupid play". For example, your outing of your mason partner was stupid play. (Unless you're scum.) My faking a dayvig may very well have saved your ass today, and almost certainly will allow us more time to find an alternative lynch if you are town, which is "clever play you don't understand".
Gorrad wrote:and then b) denying the fact that I'm certainly town, as seen in the post above.
You don't seem to get this subtlety. YOU may know you're certainly town, but it's very likely that no one else in the game besides you and your partner knows that. I have absolutely no way of telling for certain whether:

A) You and your partner are masons guaranteed innocent to each other.
or
B) You and your scumpartner agreed to a fakeclaim of masons night 1 right before YOU MURDERED ME IN COLD BLOOD!

snap je?
dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006
User avatar
MrBuddyLee
MrBuddyLee
Slightly better than 50-50
User avatar
User avatar
MrBuddyLee
Slightly better than 50-50
Slightly better than 50-50
Posts: 5219
Joined: March 2, 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Post Post #577 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:01 am

Post by MrBuddyLee »

hasdgfas wrote:Maybe you won't consider us 'confirmed innocents' until one of us dies, but why would scum out another scum in the way Gorrad did?
Panic. Because there's such a thing as "dumb scum" and I've seen scum make mistakes like that before. Regardless, I don't think either of you are a target for lynch today. Find the scum.
dialing in mildly protown reads since 2006
User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #578 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:25 am

Post by Guardian »

I'm pretty busy => reduced activity. I get much less busy Feb. 21.

I'll contribute as possible; meanwhile I still encourage Thesp votes. Note how both masons are voting Thesp. Note how I am voting Thesp. Go and do likewise.

Kison, Twomz, Rosso Carne are notably suspect lurkers/less actives, though. Still not sure what to think about flameaxe or cicero.

Cicero, where's that post of yours that was gonna consider everything that happened in the game, instead of just random points here and there?
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
User avatar
Skruffs
Skruffs
Pantsman
User avatar
User avatar
Skruffs
Pantsman
Pantsman
Posts: 6341
Joined: July 25, 2005
Location: Tower of Babel

Post Post #579 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:42 am

Post by Skruffs »

Ok, welcome back to the game MBL...

Do you think it's prudent to ask the doctor to protect you over Fritzler? After all, couldn't Fritzler continue to resurrect you, if you are killed again? Therefore, doesn't it make more sense to *not* direct the doc away from the resurrector?

Secondly:
Why did you fakedayvig Gorrad, instead of Thesp? You seemed to be equally magnanimous towards both of them.


I was at first worried that Fritz might be some sort of zombie-cultist type thing, or whatnot, but if MBL's role has changed, he can't kill anyone tonight. So hopefully you will successfully vig someone ASAP, MBL, so that we can be sure that you are stil a good guy. I don't imagine a scum resurrector cultist would be forced to publicly ressurrect, but, who knows.
User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #580 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:46 am

Post by Guardian »

fritz says he'll die at end of day.
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
User avatar
Thesp
Thesp
Supersaint
User avatar
User avatar
Thesp
Supersaint
Supersaint
Posts: 5781
Joined: November 4, 2004
Location: Round Rock, TX

Post Post #581 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 5:56 am

Post by Thesp »

Guardian wrote:I'm pretty busy => reduced activity. I get much less busy Feb. 21.

I'll contribute as possible; meanwhile I still encourage Thesp votes. Note how both masons are voting Thesp. Note how I am voting Thesp. Go and do likewise.
I'm curious - what did you think of my explanation of the perceived (though apparently incorrect) link between Gorrad and Iammars? It seemed terribly important to you earlier.
"When playing a game, the goal is to win, but it is the goal that is important, not the winning." -
Reiner Knizia

Ask me about my automatic votecounter, and how you can use it in
your
game!
Check out my 15 minutes of fame on Wait Wait...Don't Tell Me!
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #582 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 6:15 am

Post by cicero »

@Guardian:

I had weighed in as I wanted to and thought my positions were pretty clear. Butthe short version of all my thoughts (if they are so magically valuable) updated to now is:

Iammers wagon: hated it. Looks more inspired later though, given Iammers odd-claim. He also hasnt voted since he randomed me. I know because I keep going back and going, now why is THAT vote there? So maybe Guardian was on to something after all. I dont believe in the existence of a role in which you cant decide if it is or is not a pirate. But it seems just weird enough to be true.

Gorrad Wagon: Never bought it much but Claus's post was good.

Thesp-scum: I can see it because of Iammars-wagon.

Guardian scum: I can see it because of Iammars-wagon.

Thesp and Guardian: Feel the same to me in some ways. Could go either way on either of them. Lots of blah blah blah and bending over backwards to look oh so town. I was more suspicious of how Thesp ran with the Iammars wagon then how Guardian brought it up. But in both cases I'm not in a hurry to lynch the people that are doing the actual thinking in here while others run out the clock. So I'm not going to vote for either of these players today unless I see something egregious but
IGMEOY Both
. Consider it the price of the wagon.

Add to that:

TSQ Wagon: Would make sense. Not liking his play. Reasons already stated. Some agreement with Thok. I wouldnt put it past TSQ to N0 Dripping Goofball for a second. I dont care how dumb Fritzler thinks that is. It isn't. I may join this wagon. Watching.

Ultima wagon: Would make sense. Sneaking on wagons. His vote on Gorrad was based on the idea that mass-claims are always good for town. Nobody believes this. I don't believe that he believes this. So I believe he lied. And I believe that makes it more likely he is scum.

Sir Tornado: Snuck on to the Iammars wagon and shut up. Being given a meta pass at present. I really am considering becoming part of the problem and just lurking through day one's from now on.

Flameaxe: Came to the aid of two team asshat/scumchat/friends, when I pressed them. Possibly doesn't care who is and is not townie. More likely just letting his distaste for me color his play. No scumtells but nothing pro-town either. But what else is new?

Gorrad and Hasdqfas: Are what they say they are. The other possibility doesn't make sense. Too bad they are outed but shit happens. The outing of Hasdgfas was a misplay by Gorrad but contributory negligence by MBL. If your gambit counts on scum slipping up, be prepared for it to make town slip up too. Gorrad thought he was already dead and wanted to give the town a confirmed townie to help in scum-hunting, since Gorrad's death would have removed the "masonic" . Not the right move though. It should always have been Hasdgfas's prerogative to claim or not claim. His role wasn't Gorrad's to provide us.

Twomz: Coming in to just say "holy crap" is poor. I have a feeling you are town though because I don't think you'd be so cavalier as scum. But that's the definition of WIFOM there, so instead - Twomz, could you give us a rundown of your thoughts on people so far?

Other Lurkers: Already listed and prodded by other players and the mod. Need to chime in and play.

Side note for the mod: Fonz is V/LA at the moment as well.


If I think of more to say about people I'll say it. I've noted who I havent mentioned in this post and, generally, that means I dont have strong feelings about them. That has triggered me to go back and look at them harder. (Thok, for instance, feels pro-town to me and I'm on his side against TSQ for the moment, but need to re-read.)

Hope that helps.
User avatar
Thok
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
User avatar
User avatar
Thok
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Disgrace to SKs everywhere
Posts: 7013
Joined: March 28, 2005

Post Post #583 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:05 am

Post by Thok »

Guardian wrote:I'll contribute as possible; meanwhile I still encourage Thesp votes. Note how both masons are voting Thesp. Note how I am voting Thesp. Go and do likewise.
How is this an argument at all? I could easily go "I'm not voting Thesp and I have a good reputation for finding scum. Neither of MBL/Fritz are voting Thesp and both are fairly confirmed. Therefore Thesp is a bad play."

Why are you postponing describing the Thesp-Thok you claimed to saw before?
I replaced into Chess Mafia for 6 months, and all I got was a win and this lousy sig.
User avatar
Guardian
Guardian
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Guardian
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4703
Joined: March 28, 2007
Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.

Post Post #584 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:16 am

Post by Guardian »

cuz im busy, I'll get to it as soon as I have time for the game -- just letting people know my life got busy, so I'll not be able to post long awesome posts 4/5 times a day anymore, more like a few times a week.
Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
User avatar
Kison
Kison
.GIFted
User avatar
User avatar
Kison
.GIFted
.GIFted
Posts: 6714
Joined: January 22, 2007

Post Post #585 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:58 am

Post by Kison »

Hi Thesp. How are you doing? Well? Not well? What do you think of Gorrad now that he claimed Mason? What do you think of Iammars now that Gorrad has claimed Mason?
hasdgfcow wrote:I'M CONFIRMED INNOCENT!
No, you're not. Believing both you and Gorrad are town requires me to assume that you both are telling the truth. If I am assuming, then there is no certainty. If there is no certainty, then there is no confirmation. Not to mention, for such a supercool confirmed townie, you had quite a lack of contribution yourself prior to BuddyLee's vigilante fiasco.

This doesn't mean I accept Twomz's behavior(but to be fair he has used the college excuse in other games, and as a result, I am more inclined to give him a tad bit more leniency for at LEAST being consistent), but this mindset of yours has got to go. Personally, I think you and Gorrad are probably Masons together. But you're NOT confirmed.

UltimateAvalon, whenever you return, please do not forget to answer my question. Thanks.

Where the hell is Rosso?

Hi BuddyLee. Who do you think is scum? Why aren't ya voting them?
User avatar
Twomz
Twomz
Cliqued On
User avatar
User avatar
Twomz
Cliqued On
Cliqued On
Posts: 2981
Joined: November 21, 2005
Location: Texas

Post Post #586 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:16 am

Post by Twomz »

@ MBL: I am not saying Gorrad/Hasdgfas are scum. I am saying that in my mind for them to be 'confirmed' we have to have some sort of evidence besides their word (if they really are masons, their death is an eventuality so it will become apparent eventually, barring extreme WIFOM).

@ Cicero: If I am free tonight I'll do as good of a read through as I can... if not I will try to get it done Saturday.
"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #587 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:27 pm

Post by Gorrad »

Very good post, Cicero. I wholeheartedly agree with everything except the Guardian/Thesp argument- I really don't see much of a case on Guardian, care to elaborate on it?
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #588 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:38 pm

Post by Erg0 »

Gorrad/hasdfgas are, to my mind, not lynch targets but also not fully confirmed. As Twomz said, one of them will die eventually and then we'll know for sure whether thay're really masons. Confirmed townie status isn't really worth
that
much in terms of swaying my opinions on other players anyway.

I really have difficulty understanding why Guardian is kind of skating by for doing much the same thing as Thesp, but then abandoning his position when it became clear that it was becoming unpopular. At least Thesp stuck to his guns in the face of the wagon against him, which is either a sign that he was acting in good faith or a pretty big gamble if he's scum.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #589 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:45 pm

Post by cicero »

Gorrad wrote:Very good post, Cicero. I wholeheartedly agree with everything except the Guardian/Thesp argument- I really don't see much of a case on Guardian, care to elaborate on it?
I dont see much of a case against him either. It amounts to "Iammars said Yarr so he's scum? WTF?"
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #590 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 12:53 pm

Post by Erg0 »

cicero, how do you feel about the point against Guardian that I raised above?
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Skruffs
Skruffs
Pantsman
User avatar
User avatar
Skruffs
Pantsman
Pantsman
Posts: 6341
Joined: July 25, 2005
Location: Tower of Babel

Post Post #591 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:30 pm

Post by Skruffs »

Well, at least in the beginning of the game, may I point out something?

The scum can't crosskill, the first time they try. I'm presuming that MBL's target last night SHOULD have died, since he is a vig, and thus isn't subject to the cross killing rules.

However, knowing that, I just dfon't like Erg0's statement up above, that potential scum doesn't need to be lynched because they are 'likely to die' anyways. It just... strikes me as funny.

I'm nto saying that I disbelieve the mason claim, it's just a little twinge. I react to twinges.
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #592 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:55 pm

Post by Erg0 »

Skruffs wrote:Well, at least in the beginning of the game, may I point out something?

The scum can't crosskill, the first time they try. I'm presuming that MBL's target last night SHOULD have died, since he is a vig, and thus isn't subject to the cross killing rules.

However, knowing that, I just dfon't like Erg0's statement up above, that potential scum doesn't need to be lynched because they are 'likely to die' anyways. It just... strikes me as funny.

I'm nto saying that I disbelieve the mason claim, it's just a little twinge. I react to twinges.
I actually hadn't considered the nightkill thing - I'm erring on the side of assuming that the mason claim is true, so that was mainly what I was thinking about. Even taking the crosskill immunity into account, the group with the failed kill will know instantly that the masons are scum if they target them, and they'd surely be interested in getting rid of the opposing scum as soon as possible. One hand washes the other, so to speak.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
Rosso Carne
Rosso Carne
[]=====
User avatar
User avatar
Rosso Carne
[]=====
[]=====
Posts: 2182
Joined: April 22, 2006
Location: The Socialist State of America

Post Post #593 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:15 pm

Post by Rosso Carne »

cic wrote:Ultima wagon: Would make sense. Sneaking on wagons. His vote on Gorrad was based on the idea that mass-claims are always good for town. Nobody believes this. I don't believe that he believes this. So I believe he lied. And I believe that makes it more likely he is scum.

Sir Tornado: Snuck on to the Iammars wagon and shut up. Being given a meta pass at present. I really am considering becoming part of the problem and just lurking through day one's from now on.

Flameaxe: Came to the aid of two team asshat/scumchat/friends, when I pressed them. Possibly doesn't care who is and is not townie. More likely just letting his distaste for me color his play. No scumtells but nothing pro-town either. But what else is new?
Maybe be simply adding fluff where there is none, but this kind of fluff worries me.
[13:31] glorktheinvader: and I was rocking this one guy
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #594 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:20 pm

Post by cicero »

Rosso Carne wrote:
cic wrote:Ultima wagon: Would make sense. Sneaking on wagons. His vote on Gorrad was based on the idea that mass-claims are always good for town. Nobody believes this. I don't believe that he believes this. So I believe he lied. And I believe that makes it more likely he is scum.

Sir Tornado: Snuck on to the Iammars wagon and shut up. Being given a meta pass at present. I really am considering becoming part of the problem and just lurking through day one's from now on.

Flameaxe: Came to the aid of two team asshat/scumchat/friends, when I pressed them. Possibly doesn't care who is and is not townie. More likely just letting his distaste for me color his play. No scumtells but nothing pro-town either. But what else is new?
Maybe be simply adding fluff where there is none, but this kind of fluff worries me.
It isnt fluff. It's a summary of points I already made with respect to those players. And they are good points.
User avatar
Claus
Claus
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Claus
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1734
Joined: June 1, 2007
Location: Tsukuba

Post Post #595 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:31 pm

Post by Claus »

Vote: Sir Tornado


This is a policy vote. Will be removed if Sir Tornado gets replaced/dies/starts playing. Or when I get around to re-read this game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVVmAG0RXmo
User avatar
Rosso Carne
Rosso Carne
[]=====
User avatar
User avatar
Rosso Carne
[]=====
[]=====
Posts: 2182
Joined: April 22, 2006
Location: The Socialist State of America

Post Post #596 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:34 pm

Post by Rosso Carne »

cicy wrote: And they are good points.
now if they were good points i wouldnt have pointed them out as fluff, but as good points.
[13:31] glorktheinvader: and I was rocking this one guy
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #597 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:40 pm

Post by cicero »

Rosso Carne wrote:
cicy wrote: And they are good points.
now if they were good points i wouldnt have pointed them out as fluff, but as good points.
/Shrug

I think they are good.

I also think the nothing that you have contributed to the game up to now is bad.
User avatar
Erg0
Erg0
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Erg0
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4157
Joined: February 25, 2007
Location: Secret Aussie.

Post Post #598 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 3:50 pm

Post by Erg0 »

cicero, can you please answer 590? I have a feeling you missed it.
"You were doing well until everyone died."
V/LA most weekends.
User avatar
cicero
cicero
Oratoreador
User avatar
User avatar
cicero
Oratoreador
Oratoreador
Posts: 3328
Joined: July 27, 2007
Location: Toronto

Post Post #599 (ISO) » Thu Jan 31, 2008 4:06 pm

Post by cicero »

Erg0 wrote:cicero, can you please answer 590? I have a feeling you missed it.
You are correct. I did miss it. Thanks.
Erg0 wrote:I really have difficulty understanding why Guardian is kind of skating by for doing much the same thing as Thesp, but then abandoning his position when it became clear that it was becoming unpopular. At least Thesp stuck to his guns in the face of the wagon against him, which is either a sign that he was acting in good faith or a pretty big gamble if he's scum.
The only answer I can give before a re-read is that you raise a good point. On my read I found Thesp scummier than Guardian BECAUSE he was pushing the Iammars wagon further and harder - at least it seemed so at one point. But you provide an interesting counterpoint. When I reread this weekend, I'll look at it from that perspective.

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”