Mini Normal 1900 (Game Over)

[MathBlade]

Transcend's entire ISO reads like we are in 85 pages of RVS

Not helping. You're tunnelling. Please listen.

Nah I feel the same way

Really? An embarrassment? When you agreed before you "tracked" me?

I just told you why my read changed and you're not listening

You're trying to lynch me over your ego now

Grow up

Pedit: we knew Titus was a vig by day 2. Why wasn't she role blocked then under your theory?

Because her reads sucked.

[MathBlade]

Nice scumslip btw.

[MathBlade]

Transcend's entire ISO reads like we are in 85 pages of RVS

Not helping. You're tunnelling. Please listen.

Nah I feel the same way

Really? An embarrassment? When you agreed before you "tracked" me?

I just told you why my read changed and you're not listening

You're trying to lynch me over your ego now

Grow up

Pedit:

we knew Titus was a vig by day 2.

Why wasn't she role blocked then under your theory?

We. <<Die scum die.

[ThinkBig]

Nice scumslip btw.

How is this a slip?

[Flubbernugget]

We can refer to

->Town

-> Scum

-> Town and scum

You have to refute at least one and should refute two

[MathBlade]

Nice scumslip btw.

How is this a slip?

We knew. Implies a collective.

[MathBlade]

We can refer to

->Town

-> Scum

-> Town and scum

You have to refute at least one and should refute two

????

[Flubbernugget]

Really?

A player named MATHBlade can't break a proof into cases?

You're not being rational right now

[Flubbernugget]

Nice scumslip btw.

How is this a slip?

We knew. Implies a collective.

Collective of WHAT

[ThinkBig]

Nice scumslip btw.

How is this a slip?

We knew. Implies a collective.

And didn't we all know Titus was the vig on day 2?? She did claim on D2 so I fail to see what you are seeing.

[MathBlade]

I can if I understand the premises of those cases.
However without understanding the post in question dialogue is not possible.

Please restate the prompt.

[nancy]

Meh I'm gonna feel silly if I replaced into this game just to lynch Transcend and he turns out not to be scums.

[MathBlade]

Nice scumslip btw.

How is this a slip?

We knew. Implies a collective.

And didn't we all know Titus was the vig on day 2?? She did claim on D2 so I fail to see what you are seeing.

We all << Town wording

[MathBlade]

Meh I'm gonna feel silly if I replaced into this game just to lynch Transcend and he turns out not to be scums.

Ewwwwww

[MathBlade]

VOTE: Unvote

[Flubbernugget]

Meh I'm gonna feel silly if I replaced into this game just to lynch Transcend and he turns out not to be scums.

This was Transcend's reasoning for not lynching a gunsmith guilty

[MathBlade]

I have a date with Cleopatra...but ewwwwwww

[MathBlade]

Back in about 1000 years

<<< Wouldn't it be 7,000?
>>>

(This is a joke just playing Civ with friends)

[Flubbernugget]

I can if I understand the premises of those cases.
However without understanding the post in question dialogue is not possible.

Please restate the prompt.

I stated the three things that "we" can refer to.

Do you disagree that if I slipped, I can only be referring to the middle thing?

[ThinkBig]

Meh I'm gonna feel silly if I replaced into this game just to lynch Transcend and he turns out not to be scums.

Ewwwwww

I have a date with Cleopatra...but ewwwwwww

I agree it is eew, but what are you getting out of it? Regardless of flubber's alignment, Nancy is confirmed town

[nancy]

This was Transcend's reasoning for not lynching a gunsmith guilty

Hm? He didn't want to lynch the guilty because he thought Eddie was fighting back pretty well?

[nancy]

I have a date with Cleopatra...but ewwwwwww

[ThinkBig]

VOTE: Flubbernugget

L-1

For the following reasons...

1.

Setup spec.

How to win a mastina game: Listen to mastina theory. How to lose a mastian game: Ignore mastina theory.

Town lost the last mastina game because they ignored her game theory. They ignored the blatant and obvious claim that did not match with the other claims and flips. In the words of Sesame Street "One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just does not belong." In this case, the thing that does not belong is Flubbernugget's claim. Theory states to lynch the odd ball out.

2.

Contradictory motives and actions.

I questioned why flubber tracked on N1 but not N2, he claimed it was because he wanted to have a smaller pool to track on N3. How does this make sense? Wouldn't it make far more sense to not track N1 if you want a smaller tracking pool?

3.

Contradictions in his vote and in his pushes.

VOTE: Transcend

My biggest issue here is fighting off the EC lynch

Also going "flubber looks town but he's still scum, really" doesn't look like that try hard town you were talking about earlier

Here he is voting transcend (spoiler: his vote is still on transcend). However, later he states:

You're not conftown and your push on Transcend was an embarrassment

Here he is in his interactions with MathBlade. If he truly feels that MathBlade's push was awful, then why is he voting Transcend. Furthermore, from his point of view, MathBlade should still be a potential scum suspect; however, he does not treat MathBlade as a potential scum suspect.

[nancy]

VOTE: Flubber

Sure associatives point there anyway I guess.

[nancy]

Why did I spend an hour and a half reading 170 pages