shaka!! wrote:VRK wrote:
If the Mod hasn't told us, then it's a closed setup game and he won't tell us. Usually tho, there's 3 Mafia in a 12 player game, although I've seen as many as 5 in 1 scum group. There's also the possibility that we have a SK in addition to the Mafia, so we could see multiple night kills.
Didn't he ask how much mafia were in the game? Why bring up the SK?
Two trains of thought occured to me aswell upon reading VRK's post.
Your thinking was what I first thought of, and a legitimate question at that, and what to me appears to be a springboard to kill random voting almost. (but random voting is soooooo fun!
) Town vibes from this post.
Cephrir wrote:Random
Vote: angelmouse
shaka!! wrote:Didn't he ask how much mafia were in the game? Why bring up the SK?
Why not? He's a relatively new player, he may not know SKs are a possibility in Minis, etc.
I would have liked to see VRK give me this answer Ceph, but this was indeed the second line of reasoning I thought of upon reading the post.
OhGodMyLife wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Curt
for not following the mod's directions in confirming.
Seems like a great place to start a bandwagon
.
Random early bandwagons-good.
Reasonless early bandwagons-bad.
Monkey wrote:
Well, if we're lucky, maybe he won't follow the mod's directions when trying to place a kill tonight (that is of course IF he's mafia).
One could hope, right?
Can't say that I concur with it being a great place to start a wagon though, but good try.
Unvote: RimeIceFury
Funny gut like stuff from this.
angelmouse wrote:
I was only trying to get started. I'm not the biggest fan of random voting or simply reading too much into random voting either. I was only trying to provoke a reaction, which it did from you. Now i can
Unvote
knowing that at leat we have started off a discussion.
Not a huge fan of the unvote (no danger of a QL with 3 votes only) but otherwise I approve of your reaction getting from monkey.
Liking post #37(Cephrir)
Monkey wrote:
I never stated that I thought that he was in danger of lynch, what I did state was that with him being run up @ the time,
I was more afraid of a town's role being revealed earlier on
(If I remember correctly), as that's something I've seen happen in a few games that I've read here on the site .. You know mass claims and the like only give scum the upper hand.
Thanks for calling me town.
Ceph wins the TG/Ceph tussle.
Monkey wrote:shaka!! wrote:How ever you barely pressured, you voted, you got one reply and you unvoted.
QFT
2 things on this:
1.
ANGEL HAS GOTTEN MORE THEN ONE REPLY FROM HER VOTE/UNVOTE DAMMIT!
2. Solid posting by Monkey
Boo post 65 (TG)
Monkey wrote:Greasyspot wrote:
Sorry for the inactivity. I have been involved in some other games and a lot of work too. I will read thru everything and post a little later.
It's a little later now .. like 25 hours later since the last post of this game was made. I'll make the assumption that the majority of the players are waiting on you Greasyspot ....
more of letting TG getting "attacked" and Monkey sitting in the background not say anything.
Not digging Greasy's weird posting on page 3...
Monkey wrote:Greasy Spot wrote:Page 3 was an extension of 2 with more animosity towards each other. I think
you guys
jumping on Angelmouse is premature.
FOSmonkey
Underlining mine ...
Yet I'm the only one who receives an fos
Did you read the game, really Greasy Spot?
That's all you got?
I know it's only an fos, and by no means am I completely upset by it, but had you only fos'd one other player who questioned the angelmouse bit, I'd be asking you the same questions.
Alot of this appears to have already been said before by someone else. More sitting in the background not saying much here.
CFK wrote:
I found this a little reaching as well but I'm not going to FoS you, I think you are just a townie who is a little out of their depth
huh?
In general digging alot of Bob's posting on page 4.
I'm OK with CFK's attempt to get more from greasy(who fails to comply).
Monkey wrote:Vote: Curt
The inactivity in this game is very hard to deal with, so I suggest voting out one of the players who is so inactive, since our mod doesn't seem to want to prod/replace these players.
Curt's last post was on the 13th.
And when exactly was your last meaningful post?
Actively lurking is way worse...
why isn't monkey dead yet exactly????
VOTE: MONKEY