you messed up?RossWilliam wrote:I think I have every right to take Sarc seriously when he is fifth vote on my bandwagon. I think even though I messed up, five votes is too much for what I did. and neither Sarc or Pooky have given me reasons that I can defend myself against. It's only logical that i'm frusterated.
Besides the fact that I said mith was scummy WHICH I CORRECTED why am I up there?petroleumjelly wrote:Masons are town, unless otherwise stated.
Scum
wolfcrier
RossWilliam
Monkey
Vote: wolfcrier.
Is this strictly bandwagon or do you have your own theorys on me? If you do please exaserbate (not sure on spelling)hasdgfas wrote:Hallelujah, Amen?
vote: wolfcrier
Wow. What kinda crap is that?RossWilliam wrote:I actually don't really know. Sheepish answer, I know. But it would feel iffy voting him before he even posted in the new day.
A few more clarifications and questions, then (and this is by no means saying I will not have any more after this).RossWilliam wrote:Is this vote still paired with your total scum list? Because if that's the case I would have probably echoed some good point somewhere that someone else made about Monkey. Like I said, I didn't think it through. I probably would have behaved similary. You may perceive this as scummy behavior, that's up to you, but at this point I think the best thing for me to do is just be honest regardless of consequence. Cutting corners certainly got me in a hole.
This gives me bad vibes. I'd hate to lynch another immensely scummy player, who turns out to just be a new townie who cracked under pressure.Mastermind of Sin wrote:I think RossWilliam is making some rookie mistakes, but I think they areprotownrookie mistakes. At least he's being honest with his thoughts, even when they don't make sense.
I think Holy brings up a good point about Monkey. His post voting Greasy Spot seemed like an overjustification to me. It's like he was trying to pile on as many reasons for voting as he could think of that applied, even remotely, to Greasy Spot.
Vote: Monkey
Monkey, who do you think is most likely to be the Jester at this point?Monkey wrote:Vote: Sarcastrocause leaving a vote on someone when you're not even finished reading just seems to open a window for you to say later, Oh I didn't know that so and so was that close to a lynch.
To defend myself with my reasonings to vote greasy spot, I don't believe that's something out of the norm for myself to do. I like to make sure it's known why I'm voting for someone, and I'd still be getting pointed at today more then likely if I only used one reason I'm sure.
For general purposes he seems to be reading, but acting as though he isn't. I don't think that Ross is close to a lynch necessarily, but he is our lead bandwagon for now.PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:He isn't close to lynch
what are you talking about..
I can't say that anyone has struck me as of yet, and my vote isn't going to lynch him, I just want my vote there for the record for now. Yes I know that you believe that he's the jester Battle Mage, but I'm not in agreement with that belief just yet.Battle Mage wrote:Monkey, who do you think is most likely to be the Jester at this point?
BM
Maybe. Probably not. If it was someone who was totally out of the blue, I would i have realized I would look like a total tool following you and kept it to myself. But anyone with some degree of suspicion on them, yes1.) Can I conclude correctly that you would have found a reason to vote most anyone I happened to vote at the beginning of Day Two (besides a vote on yourself)?
I do find you town enough, and you come off like you know what your doing. But it's not especially you, I probably would have acted the same if it was any experianced player who made the post. Your someone that other people in the game would follow, and you were calling me suspicious. It would have to be someone of equal par to that. So if it was greasy spot making the post, then I would have stayed clear away.-->1a.) If you answered "yes", why is that? Have you found me particularly town, or is it something else?
Not always, I will usually try to find my own opinions. But when I feel like I'm at stake, I have a bad tendacy to act too fast, and take the easy route out.-->1b.) Are you the type of player who votes based on other players' votes?
I'd like to say no because of all the negative stigma associated with the term, but like I said before, I cut corners sometimes. I suppose that technically I am a bandwagoner, but only when I'm rushing, or lazy.-->1c.) Do you consider yourself a bandwagoner?
I'll admit, i haven't been paying him much attention, but I went back an gathered all his posts for review. I agree completely with his points about tyhess's cult, back in the early game when he was barely noticed. Then he got a bit contradictory when he made his dual accusation against BM and GS (who were vehemently anti-jester intrigue), while at the same time chastizing the rest of the town for being preoccupied with all the jester intrigue. It could be interperated that he was bandwagoning there, but at the same time, he voted for neither BM or GS. so I don't know. a couple pages later he started his real fued with BM, with his amusing kid's birthday party post. 388. BM responded, and I have to be honest, most of it goes over my head. Pooky makes more sense of it afterwards though. QuickBen confirms his apathy about the whole jester thing. then wooosh, greasy spot is lynched, mith and dani night killed, and we're at day two. He has yet to post today.2.) What do you think of Quickben?
Yes, I am interested in hunting scum. But other than pressuring has to break his post restriction, I haven't done much yet. I'm still a relatively inexperianced player, and I've found I have a hard time reading someone's posts and analyzing their alleigance from it. I'm working on it, but to really be able to do that flawlessly comes with playing tonnes and tonnes and mafia games. I have not yet completed a game. However, I am going to do my best to retain objectivity, and every experiance in these games, including this one, puts me on the path towards being a much better, smoothly player. I'm in my awkward teen stages of mafia, if you will. Just gotta wait til the zits go away and my voice stops changing.3.) Are you actually interested in hunting for scum? If so, please show me an example in the game where you believe you have honestly made an effort to catch scum.
As expected as that (untrue) insult is, I'm rather pleasantly surprised by the rest of your statement. Thanks, BM.Battle Mage wrote:Much as it is the case that few people like or respect him, it is also the case that he is a fairly good player, and certainly puts effort into these games. I find it very hard to see him as scum atm, UNLESS he is bluffing Jester.
