Thespival Mafia (Denouement)

[RossWilliam]

he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

vote RossWilliam

choo choo

[al_kohaulec]

he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.

Why was mith obviously not scummy?

[al_kohaulec]

has, what bad happened last night?

[hasdgfas]

nothing explicit...

[al_kohaulec]

When you say something bad will happen, do you know if that something bad is necessarily bad for you, or something that could be bad for the town in general?

[hasdgfas]

regarding me

[curiouskarmadog]

he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.

so you think he is scummy because he said mith was scummy, what about me, I thought GS was scummy and he turned out to be town.and refresh my memory where was your vote day 1?

[Holy]

I AM THE JESTER!!

You lied earlier, what makes you think you'll be believed now?

Vote: Greasy Spot

, b/c:
1. He lied
2. He requested it, and
3. I think that there's more then enough material that been covered here on the 1st day.

That places Greasy Spot at L-2 btw. Keeping him around for endgame just isn't very appealing to me atm, and if he really is the jester then that's one less party to compete for 1st place with.

His reason voting GS was overabundance IMHO, seems fake.

Vote: Monkey

.

[RossWilliam]

I didn't vote for a reason. I'd understand these attacks if I voted for him off the bat. I want to see how he responds to the new votes on him as well. Can we at least wait til that happens before we get this RW bandwagon going? I'm honestly very suprised by this, I wasn't aware I was apparently being so scummy

[Sarcastro]

Vote: RossWilliam

I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.

[Monkey]

I AM THE JESTER!!

You lied earlier, what makes you think you'll be believed now?

Vote: Greasy Spot

, b/c:
1. He lied
2. He requested it, and
3. I think that there's more then enough material that been covered here on the 1st day.

That places Greasy Spot at L-2 btw. Keeping him around for endgame just isn't very appealing to me atm, and if he really is the jester then that's one less party to compete for 1st place with.

His reason voting GS was overabundance IMHO, seems fake.

Vote: Monkey

.

What's fake about it? I didn't make any of that up.

[RossWilliam]

Sarcasto, I don't like that one bit. You hammered GS, which I can't and won't condemn in and of itself, but now you're voting for me while actually admitting that you don't even really have a reason. You just fully owned up to jumping on a bandwagon for no good reason.

FoS: Sarcasto

and please don't write this off as OMGUS because it is anything but. You're getting yourself a bad track record my very oppurtunistic friend

[Holy]

@Monkey: it sounds like you want to appeared understand enough of his scummy situation (at least for me). Also I sensed an eagerness on that, hasdgfas just broke his restriction, and there's still time before the deadline (which wasn't so far away ).

[al_kohaulec]

I didn't vote for a reason. I'd understand these attacks if I voted for him off the bat. I want to see how he responds to the new votes on him as well. Can we at least wait til that happens before we get this RW bandwagon going? I'm honestly very suprised by this, I wasn't aware I was apparently being so scummy

Scum usually doesn't notice they're being scummy.

Now why did you say 'mith was obviously not scummy'?

Sarcasto, I don't like that one bit. You hammered GS, which I can't and won't condemn in and of itself, but now you're voting for me while actually admitting that you don't even really have a reason. You just fully owned up to jumping on a bandwagon for no good reason.

FoS: Sarcasto

and please don't write this off as OMGUS because it is anything but. You're getting yourself a bad track record my very oppurtunistic friend

Sarc claimed he agrees with Pooky for now. Not that just that is a good reason, but it's definitely not claiming for no reason at all. You are misrepresenting him and you sound frantic about this wagon while trying hard to not offend anybody else into voting you.

Vote: RossWilliam

[RossWilliam]

No....His exact words were

I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.

If he agreed with Pooky, he would just say, I agree with Pooky. But he puts in his disclaimer about how he hasn't read everything yet. and he did put the hammer on GS last game after only just replacing into the game. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on that.

And I said mith was obviously not scummy because mith's card says Mason on it. I meant he was obviously not scummy now, i had no real opinion of him yesterday except he was a smart player.

and lastly, I am the farthest thing from frantic. It's virtually impossible to be frantic on a forum, and by saying that, you are misrepresenting me. so let's go easy on that.

[Battle Mage]

*damage control* What a lame first day... *damage control*

This is by far the scummiest post of the day so far:

he made a lot of contradictions on day one, and he was quoted as saying mith was extremely scummy when mith is, obviously not. same reasons as everyone else.

Certainly enough to earn my vote.

Vote: RossWilliam

Anyone voting for Sarc is dumb. An FoS i can just about tolerate, because there is no doubt that his play is scummy. Of course, the fact that he is quite obviously the Jester is enough to keep him alive today at least.

Although in fairness, i also totally disagree with AlKo's comments about Sarc, in that, clearly if Sarc is just 'following Pooky' that is as good as voting blindly, unless you are insinuating that he has confirmation of Pooky's innocence/superior intelligence.

Anyway, i'm still fine with a Ross wagon atm.

BM

[MeMe]

vote: Sarcastro

Oh shoot. Now BM thinks I'm dumb.

[Talitha]

Just checking in to see who didn't survive the night.

Boo.

My limited access will be rectified in a day or so.

[Battle Mage]

vote: Sarcastro

Oh shoot. Now BM thinks I'm dumb.

Look on the bright side. At least i dont think you're scum. :p

[RossWilliam]

and plus, the only words Pooky has said all day other than his vote for me and fis first "good morning" post are "choo choo."

Sarc, where in those two words do you find enough facts to sign your vote on with? Is it the first choo? the second choo? enlighten me please. BM, alko, do you really find him not sketchy at all? Is blatant oppurtunism not a scumtell?

[al_kohaulec]

No....His exact words were

I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.

If he agreed with Pooky, he would just say, I agree with Pooky. But he puts in his disclaimer about how he hasn't read everything yet. and he did put the hammer on GS last game after only just replacing into the game. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on that.

And I said mith was obviously not scummy because mith's card says Mason on it. I meant he was obviously not scummy now, i had no real opinion of him yesterday except he was a smart player.

and lastly, I am the farthest thing from frantic. It's virtually impossible to be frantic on a forum, and by saying that, you are misrepresenting me. so let's go easy on that.

My statement about mith is because your post is attacking (at the moment I can't think of who you were attacking) a player for saying mith is scummy, and your reasoning is that mith is obviously not scummy. The only reason you know this is because mith is dead and you know his role. I can elaborate on this if you want, but this makes the logic of casting suspicion for that reasoning faulty.

I am not making any claims on Sarc being town, but I don't agree with your attacks on him.


I'll try to comment on more later when I get time.

[Battle Mage]

and plus, the only words Pooky has said all day other than his vote for me and fis first "good morning" post are "choo choo."

Sarc, where in those two words do you find enough facts to sign your vote on with? Is it the first choo? the second choo? enlighten me please. BM, alko, do you really find him not sketchy at all? Is blatant oppurtunism not a scumtell?

Dont be immature. Its obvious that Sarc is acting scummy, but has it never crossed your mind that he could just be the JESTER? lol
The hammer yesterday pretty much clinched it for me. Of course he is scummy, but that doesnt mean i want to lynch the Jester just yet. :p
It is worrying that you are taking him so seriously...

BM

[Battle Mage]

No....His exact words were

I've almost finished reading, so until then I'm just going to agree with Pooky.

If he agreed with Pooky, he would just say, I agree with Pooky. But he puts in his disclaimer about how he hasn't read everything yet. and he did put the hammer on GS last game after only just replacing into the game. I want to hear everybody's thoughts on that.

And I said mith was obviously not scummy because mith's card says Mason on it. I meant he was obviously not scummy now, i had no real opinion of him yesterday except he was a smart player.

and lastly, I am the farthest thing from frantic. It's virtually impossible to be frantic on a forum, and by saying that, you are misrepresenting me. so let's go easy on that.

My statement about mith is because your post is attacking (at the moment I can't think of who you were attacking) a player for saying mith is scummy, and your reasoning is that mith is obviously not scummy. The only reason you know this is because mith is dead and you know his role. I can elaborate on this if you want, but this makes the logic of casting suspicion for that reasoning faulty.

AlKo is spot on here. Mith was as sketchy as hell. Saying that anyone attacking him is suspicious, AFTER HE HAS BEEN NK'D is basically arguing the WIFOM of Night actions.

BM

[RossWilliam]

I think I have every right to take Sarc seriously when he is fifth vote on my bandwagon. I think even though I messed up, five votes is too much for what I did. and neither Sarc or Pooky have given me reasons that I can defend myself against. It's only logical that i'm frusterated.