Isn't Skitzer close to being a confirmed townie right now? I've been thinking.
mikeburnfire wrote:Her half-melted face turns toward a certain person, but because her face is partially destroyed you are unable to determine who she is looking at.
"YOU WILL BE THE FIRST TO SUFFER MY WRATH! EVEN IF I DIE, YOU CANNOT STOP THE MURDERS! YOU WILL BE NEXT!"
We now know that Holy was lying about her rolename. However, was she lying about her role? This part of her death scene indicates that
something
was supposed to happen to
someone
as a result of her death. If it was indeed the case that the hammerer would die, then I shouldn't be alive.
Consider, further, the game's flavour. I stand by my earlier assumption that Opie was a doc. His role stated that he "gave a good dream" to his target while Holy's death scene threatened that we wouldn't be safe "in our dreams." (Also, she was a "sadist" that was burned to death. Sound familiar? I wonder if the mod is a horror movie fan.)
This all leads me to a conclusion. Holy's death did trigger someone being targetted with death (Me, perhaps. Given the dream flavour of the game I suppose it's reasonable to assume that a dream-based kill could only take place at night regardless of whether it relied on a nightchoice being sent in) and Opie's doc power stopped it. Opie died as a result of the scum's kill, not Holy's death.
What does this mean? Importantly, it means that Opie was not roleblocked. If Skitzer was a scum roleblocker, blocking Opie's protection power would be in his best interests as scum, especially when I would have been a tantilizing target for a doc. He did not. If Skitzer is telling the truth about being a roleblocker, he is not scum. I realise that there's a degree of speculating going on here, but I really don't think Skitzer is who we should be looking at right now.