Mini Normal 1900 (Game Over)

Flubbernugget · Post Post #875 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 12:29 am

I still think Transcend is scum.

What do you think?

Transcend · Post Post #876 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 12:35 am

bluburnugit

Transcend · Post Post #877 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 12:54 am

eddie's 741 gives me massive town vibes btw

schadd_ · Post Post #878 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 1:13 am

In post 868, RadiantCowbells wrote:Schadd don't you care that I think that you're scum?

i kind of do

RadiantCowbells wrote:like Schadd's nonchalant attitude towards my scumreading him is totally unlike anything I've seen from him and makes me strongly suspect that he's scum

i uh don't believe you

schadd_ · Post Post #879 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 1:18 am

In post 861, schadd_ wrote:also, rc, how much do you play wifom? as both alignments

Eddie Cane · Post Post #880 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 1:47 am

In post 877, Transcend wrote:eddie's 741 gives me massive town vibes btw

me too

rb · Post Post #881 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 5:12 am

In post 880, Eddie Cane wrote:
In post 877, Transcend wrote:eddie's 741 gives me massive town vibes btw
me too

wow eddie is good at reading eddie

eddie what alignment is eddie u seem to know how eddie thinks

Titus · Post Post #882 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 5:37 am

In post 858, RadiantCowbells wrote:VOTE: Schadd

Trans is near 100% scum too but :shrug:

Yeah, see this isn't really talking to me. Believe me, you want to talk to me.

We cannot afford me being the group dumbass in this.

Tell me why Transcend is scum. Tell me what you think of the alignments of the people who won't lynch Transcend.

I don't want a binary approach of gee I cannot spam through Transcend lynch, so I will pick someone else and try to spam through their list.

rb · Post Post #883 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 5:38 am

do the binary approach it's better

Fart · Post Post #884 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 5:58 am

@Titus, who have you identified as unwilling to lynch Transcend?

Fart · Post Post #885 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:00 am

In post 785, Fart wrote:
In post 767, Titus wrote:
In post 764, Fart wrote:also scum will have to read that in case there's a soft claim in there which makes me wet just thinking about them arguing in their PT about whether or not it's worth it
No they don't. You are not living through today, even if you manage to escape the noose due to spam and useless nonsense.
why would you say this?

are dayvigs Normal? if not I don't get this post

Antihuman · Post Post #886 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:12 am

As normal as a fart after eating beans

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #887 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:23 am

It's not about not wanting to talk it's about not having any idea what to say. I'm really not good at expressing myself in these situations/

Eddie Cane · Post Post #888 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:36 am

In post 881, rb wrote:
In post 880, Eddie Cane wrote:
In post 877, Transcend wrote:eddie's 741 gives me massive town vibes btw
me too
wow eddie is good at reading eddie

eddie what alignment is eddie u seem to know how eddie thinks

probably not cultist

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #889 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:39 am

If you're claiming that you believe that I'm declaring you scum for troll reasons then you're wrong. I think that you're scum. go from there.

Titus · Post Post #890 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:41 am

In post 884, Fart wrote:@Titus, who have you identified as unwilling to lynch Transcend?

When you actually provide protown content, I will answer your questions. This question, I will not answer because I want RC to answer.

Titus · Post Post #891 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:42 am

In post 887, RadiantCowbells wrote:It's not about not wanting to talk it's about not having any idea what to say. I'm really not good at expressing myself in these situations/

Try.

Flubbernugget · Post Post #892 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:47 am

In post 890, Titus wrote:
In post 884, Fart wrote:@Titus, who have you identified as unwilling to lynch Transcend?
When you actually provide protown content, I will answer your questions. This question, I will not answer because I want RC to answer.

I don't get why you think this isn't a pro town question to ask

rb · Post Post #893 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:56 am

lol @ thinking titus is going to make sense as either alignment

Titus · Post Post #894 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:00 am

In post 892, Flubbernugget wrote:
In post 890, Titus wrote:
In post 884, Fart wrote:@Titus, who have you identified as unwilling to lynch Transcend?
When you actually provide protown content, I will answer your questions. This question, I will not answer because I want RC to answer.
I don't get why you think this isn't a pro town question to ask

Because I asked RC to answer and listen to those who refused. I want him to read and engage those who disagree with him.

By telling him who I feel refuses to lynch Transcend, I short circuit that.

Tldr; He Garciaed.

rb · Post Post #895 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:00 am

as scum titus has a vested interest in not quite making sense

as town she just says things that are logical in isolation but don't make sense in context

she has a powerbrain for overanalysing small details that won't ever make sense to anyone who sees 'big picture'. i dunno if she ignores big picture or just doesn't ever see it, but that's titus

Eddie Cane · Post Post #896 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:17 am

so what are you translating that to in relation to this game

rb · Post Post #897 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:20 am

im translating it to, "why would u ever ask titus what she means"

Titus not making sense is per par

Eddie Cane · Post Post #898 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:21 am

well I still flat out don't get the chaos fart relationship Titus is fixated on so I suppose that's true

rb · Post Post #899 (ISO) » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:21 am

i mean the whole interaction with RC is dumb

RC is capable player and better off not paying attention to titus, and forming reads the way they're comfortable