Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[Erg0]

Or

, and bear with me here, he's scum and thus the scum did not kill him.

You seem to be making some big assumptions about the source of the kills...

[hasdgfas]

I know one of two things. Either he's NK immune or

someone

tried to kill him.

[Erg0]

Oh lordy - why am I getting the same vibe from you now that I got from Peers yesterday?

[Erg0]

Thinking about this some more:

1. A nightkill immune doctor seems highly unlikely.

2. I can't see why a doctor would protect Peers, given that they would be even less likely to believe his claim than the average townie. With a dead jailkeeper, I doubt that we have more than one doctor type role left alive, and I'm sure that the doctor would be thinking the same thing.

Despite what you say, it seems unlikely that either of these scenarios is correct from a logical point of view.

[Quagmire]

Vote: Bookitty

I'd like to point out:

1) Remember when I called TS a dumbass? Case in point.
2) Why does nobody listen to my case against Bookitty? It's a good case indeed.

[YagamiLight]

I know one of two things. Either he's NK immune or

someone

tried to kill him.

There's also the possibility that he is scum and the vig believed his claim (Erg0's thought), or he really is the doc, the vig believed his claim, and the scum wanted to get us to lynch him so set up the WIFOM here. I think what Erg0 said is more likely, due to what he said already, and the fact that I think it is just more likely the scum would want to immediately remove the doc and not give him a chance.

[IH]

.........

NEGWLTWWWTKY

Something about nuclear I know that.

but really?

FoS:TS

[Erg0]

Nuclear Energy something something WereWolves Want To Kill You.

[JordanA24]

Nuclear Experiment Gone Wrong something something Werewolves etc

[Erg0]

Got it.

Nuclear Experiment Gone Wrong Leads To Werewolves Who Want To Kill You.

[JordanA24]

That makes sense

[Erg0]

Cookies for all!

We now return you to your regularly scheduled game already in progress.

[Peers]

Last night, Peers protected someone who he thought would be a prime target if they weren't scum. That person was apparently not attacked.

Unless.

If we have Werewolves, a Serial Killer, and a Vigilante, then I -did- stop someone from killing last night. The only person who knows for certain is the killer, if there is one. So I'm a bit loathe to reveal who I protected.

[Sir Tornado]

Also, what was the case on KScope apart from lurking? I can't seem to find an especially good one, but we still lynched him, and look at that, we got a powerrole. This is really why we need to make sure we have plenty of reasons for lynching someone before we actually do, instead of rushing ahead

with no claim[/b] like Panzer and hasd did.

What is the case on

me

apart from lurking?

[hasdgfas]

Sir T:
You made all of

TWO

posts throughout the entire 50+ page day 1. Why would you lurk

that much

? That was completely ridiculous.

[Erg0]

Also, what was the case on KScope apart from lurking? I can't seem to find an especially good one, but we still lynched him, and look at that, we got a powerrole. This is really why we need to make sure we have plenty of reasons for lynching someone before we actually do, instead of rushing ahead

with no claim[/b] like Panzer and hasd did.

What is the case on

me

apart from lurking?

This has got to be the best request for a case ever - you said not a single word other than your two votes on day 1.

[Sir Tornado]

Erg0... read my post in context with Jordan's post, most of which I have quoted...

[Sir Tornado]

You made all of TWO posts throughout the entire 50+ page day 1. Why would you lurk that much? That was completely ridiculous.

I can think of many reasons starting from: I may not have read the game more than 15 pages at any point.

[Erg0]

Your comparison is invalid. There's a big difference between lynching someone for lurking and putting the first vote on them for lurking.

[hasdgfas]

Sir T: Then read the previous couple of pages and say something about them. Mega-lurking like you did should not be acceptable.

[IH]

Peers your logic makes babies cry.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Peers your logic makes babies cry.

Reveal who you protected immediately.

[Erg0]

I don't really see the point of asking Peers for his target in the first place - it's not like he's going to blow his claim by naming someone that died, and if he's really the Doc then he is correct in not telling us.

[Albert B. Rampage]

I don't really see the point of asking Peers for his target in the first place - it's not like he's going to blow his claim by naming someone that died, and if he's really the Doc then he is correct in not telling us.

Bullshit. Claim who you protected Peers.

[IH]

It doesn't matter who his target is atm.

It just makes babies cry.