Lets follow through on this one guys!Incognito wrote:Incognito wrote:...Who is your scum buddy?An admittance? It's funny though, because you are not my goon as I am the GF. So I guess this entire statement is false.Flameaxe wrote:I am saying them, you just can't hear them because you can't hear me talk on a forum.
Seriously, Flameaxe, why did you sign up for this game if you're not going to contribute anything?
You're contributing just as much as me only because I called you out for lurking. Your lurking was the reason I placed a vote on you. And I never stated that I think you're scum - I placed a vote on you to pressure you into talking more and it seems to have worked. I really don't know what to make of your actions as of right now but like I said, I wouldn't have a problem vigging you if I was lynched more because I think you're acting like an ass rather than me thinking you're scum.Flameaxe wrote:Can I ask for some clarification? Your original vote for me was because I was "lurking in plain sight", and now I'm contributing just as much as you, point out a flaw in your play, push it, and now I'm scum for that too? Gotcha.
Both Flameaxe and I are both at L-1. How in the world could you claim this to be distancing especially since the mafia in this game consists of a Godfather (whom, if killed, would result in a mafia loss) and a Goon? That would be a 50/50 chance for one of the remaining players to hammer one of us and cause us to lose the game if we were both scum.Nocmen wrote:Fos: Flameaxe and Incognitofor blatant distancing.
You, I think. Because your play style is off, and I can't figure out why. Part of it is how little content your posts have. Part of it is that you didn't really react when I told you this the first time. I'm really starting to think you're one of the bad guys. The fact that you deliberately provoked Flameaxe and Incognito while they were getting into it with each other didn't help.Nocmen wrote:For all players: If you were lynched right now, who would you vig and why?
True, but only one vote on each of you (each other's) seems serious. somestrangeflea's vote was his first post, and Nocmen's stated reason for voting for you is that your name is "weirdlyish".Incognito wrote:Both Flameaxe and I are both at L-1.
Do you really think that Nocmen's vote is still not serious? Yeah, his initial reason for voting for me was because my name is "weirdlyish" but do notice that he did place an FoS on both Flameaxe and I, and he hasn't unvoted me despite the fact that I'm at L-1. Also did you notice his apparent contradiction? Have a look at what Nocmen said here:Jester wrote:True, but only one vote on each of you (each other's) seems serious. somestrangeflea's vote was his first post, and Nocmen's stated reason for voting for you is that your name is "weirdlyish".Incognito wrote:Both Flameaxe and I are both at L-1.
Here, he mentions that he somewhat agrees with you when you mentioned that it's far too early to have someone at Lynch - 1 but yet heNocmen wrote:I agree somewhat with what Jester said, but I think that it would be completely stupid for the lynched to automatically go after the hammer, unless it was a quicklynch at the end, and even then theres still some excpetions to that. If someone was trying to convince for a lynch for a while after voting for someone, and then someone ended up lynching the person they were attacking, I would in that situation go after who was trying to convince the town, as they most likely would be the scum.
I wanted somestrangeflea's point of view mainly because he's been fairly laconic since the last time he posted, which was about this time last week. You had posted before the weekend so I felt like you were monitoring the thread. Nocmen's and Flameaxe's statuses were obvious. somestrangeflea has been quiet though. My mentioning of vigging the Flameaxe is driven more by personal reasons though since I think he’s an ass so I’d love to shoot him lol. Nocmen’s response to this situation and his apparent contradiction has me questioning his alignment though so if anything, I would probably vig Nocmen instead if I were hammered.Jester wrote:Itisinteresting that you want to hear somestrangeflea's point of view, though! He's the other vote on Flameaxe right now. Suppose he takes Flameaxe's side, switches his vote, and finishes you off? You've strongly implied that you're going to use your vig on Flameaxe, so you're giving somestrangeflea a free pass to hammer you. It's a risky tactic on your part. It therefore either speaks to your townishness or your cunning as a scum.
Yeah...Incog and myself were WAY past the point of "into it" when Nocmen jumped in...Jester wrote:You, I think. Because your play style is off, and I can't figure out why. Part of it is how little content your posts have. Part of it is that you didn't really react when I told you this the first time. I'm really starting to think you're one of the bad guys. The fact that you deliberately provoked Flameaxe and Incognito while they were getting into it with each other didn't help.Nocmen wrote:For all players: If you were lynched right now, who would you vig and why?
Still, I might look at the circumstances of the situation if it were to come up.
I disagree with the above, personally, but can see where you're coming from, so fair enough.Jester wrote:During a holiday period, I wasn't willing to take that risk. It would have been way too easy for motivated scum to quickly end the game with two votes on someone during that time.
...was BS. As it stands, I think it's a dead cert that at leastNocmen wrote:Fos: Flameaxe and Incognitofor blatant distancing.
Flea: I don't like the way you've set this up as only one absolute possibility. The way I see it, there's really only two possible scenarios here: 1) Flameaxe and I are both town or 2) one of us is town and the other is scum. While I can only speak on behalf of my own alignment, your statement could be a subtle attempt at paving the way for a mis-vig if one of us is lynched. And considering the fact that this is Vengeful, that would be an automatic town loss.somestrangeflea wrote:As it stands, I think it's a dead cert that at leastoneof them is scum, though I'm not sure which...