In post 105, Eddie Cane wrote:since when is ignoring a RHETORIC question scum indicative? this is blatantly misrepping a situation. also in reply to 71: it isn't scum afraid of getting lynched, i5s nai newb afraid of getting lynched. I'm really annoyed how you're trying to push a lynch on a newbie for awful reasonig this early.
Yes, I didn't like Shadow_step saying DogWatch ignoring his 'rhetorical' question was scummy - but I don't think that makes Shadow_step scum. I feel like Shadow_step is a player who holds what HE thinks is town-indicative/scum-indicative as Gospel.
However, I think that the DogWatch 'mafiascum-newb' suggestions are being easily snapped up as scum-play here.
If DogWatch is an experienced mafia player, trying to get the three players to explain their RVS vote is non-sensical/ridiculous futile play. What is scum-DogWatch trying to achieve here?
Newb-scum DogWatch is the other option, but it sounds like DogWatch has experience where he/she has come from:
<< thus, DogWatch is not a true newb to the game. Just a newb to mafiascum site meta
...or the fact their scum-hunting game is rusty:
In post 105, Eddie Cane wrote:you're right, you're not an ic,
but that doesn't mean you should be an asshole
. he's new, I called him out a bit for the rvs vote questioning too. that's not scum indicative at all. but actually, viewing your iso, you've been tunnelling him from your first post.
Yum, I'm loving the venom here.
Let the hate flow through you!
(half town point earned).
FYI: early tunnels are good. We need to see players under pressure. If Shadow_step was tunneling players later in the game I'd be suspicious (ignoring other players). Right now, I think DogWatch has unknowingly been making himself an easy target by his mafiascum-newb behaviour.