I replaced in at the start of my weekend (which was extended a extra day due to a Nor' Easter) during which time I am v/LA. So there wouldn't be a lot of posting on my part. I only have one vote so why would I need to switch it to Terata? And my "obsession" is questioning why people are interested in lynching a claimed PR (the only one afaict that has actually claimed a specific role) on D1 rather then letting things sort them out N1? How is that scummy? Iirc there are others of the same mindset....including unknown of "liked entry" fame. It's D1...I'm not 100% sold on Sheep...or any of my reads...but I am 100% sold on an aversion to lynching claimed PRs when it's not necessary.In post 1163, Lowell wrote:I've liked unknown's entry into the game for the most part, but disliked havingfitz. Fitz' sheep case feels a bit like a sideshow. He mentions in 986 his two suspects are sheep and terata, votes sheep, then doesn't mention either of them again. He's made no effort to move the needle on this wagon, or turn it to terata. His only obsession seems to be hassling people who vote wheme. Being more concerned about people NOT voting a player, rather than wanting people TO vote a player, is a scumtell for me.
fos havingfitz
For your lurky ass to catch up and start pushing the effort crap you are on me is bs.
How the fuck is lack of suspicion a reason for suspicion?
