Mini Normal 1879 Bringer Mafia II [Game Over]

Fro99er · Post Post #1175 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:15 am

In post 1174, Lowell wrote:I'd vote EC, fitz, ali, and wheme. Maybe others, I'd have to look closer.

Why Wheme?

I thought you just said you weren't comfortable voting in the PRs?

Aj The Epic · Post Post #1176 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:15 am

Can we talk about the fact that there are still 4 votes on Wheme even though we have this possible night action? Alisae, Terata, ECMitchell, CO. Oddly, ECM/Terata let their arguments against each other just die.

Also Lowell's reads give him no sustained reason to be voting ECM at this point, especially considering in last interaction, Terata really sucked at arguing against ECM. And Lowell supposedly has more recent scumreads.

Alisae · Post Post #1177 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:16 am

Aj I unvoted Wheme.

Fro99er · Post Post #1178 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:17 am

In post 1176, Aj The Epic wrote:Can we talk about the fact that there are still 4 votes on Wheme even though we have this possible night action? Alisae, Terata, ECMitchell, CO

I was just looking at that as well.

I'm trying to sort out some possible scum combinations (that's how I play, I don't care what people say). Although Ali is no longer on the Wheme wagon.

Lowell · Post Post #1179 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:18 am

frogger, no, AJ, no, sheep and terata, probably not, hawk, meh. chaos, probably not.

In post 1175, Fro99er wrote:
In post 1174, Lowell wrote:I'd vote EC, fitz, ali, and wheme. Maybe others, I'd have to look closer.
Why Wheme?

I thought you just said you weren't comfortable voting in the PRs?

If it comes to that or nothing at deadline I'll lynch wheme. It'll provide some info on havingfitz. If wheme flips scum fitz is probably scum too. Though yes I'd rather do in reverse.

Fro99er · Post Post #1180 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:18 am

In post 1176, Aj The Epic wrote:Also Lowell's reads give him no sustained reason to be voting ECM at this point

That's exactly why I was pressing him about his vote. It makes no sense to leave a stale vote there.

Lowell · Post Post #1181 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:19 am

Oh yeah still voting EC.

VOTE: fitz

ChaosOmega · Post Post #1182 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:20 am

In post 1126, Fro99er wrote:Chaos -- don't out your role or anything. Just let us know if you can do something to sort Wheme tonight.

If it is, then wheme should target Chaos so he protects Chaos from a kill and Chaos can do his power thing to sort wheme.

If it's not, then I say we let the night play out and lynch in the non-claimed-PRs.

Does me answering yes to this question change your lynch pool? If so, in what ways?

Cooperative Sheep · Post Post #1183 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:20 am

In post 1152, Unknown1234 wrote:Sheep has been gone for so long that I haven't even said something to them once. Given they've been under some heat all day I honestly wouldn't be too surprised if they were lurking scum.

I've been generally posting multiple times a day every day of the game, are you mixing me up with someone else?

People are ignoring how bad Hawk is until just now.
I'm actually having a hard time figuring out if there's more theory soft support for Lowell or Hawk.
I'mma do this to see if it's Lowell.

Vote: Lowell

Sheep the sheep everyone! There is mint julep tea at the end of this rainbow.
I will be back later if people manage to bum rush onto Hawk, the guy who talks out of both sides of his mouth all day.
I still oppose the Wheme lynch.

Fro99er · Post Post #1184 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:22 am

Yes -- it means I am not lynching you or Wheme, and I'd even probably avoid a Lowell lynch because if you can sort wheme tonight then in some ways that helps sort hawk, so there's less need to lynch Lowell for information about if he and hawk are a team.

In that case I'd lynch Alisae in a heartbeat.

Are you answering yes?

havingfitz · Post Post #1185 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:22 am

I'm about to be offline for a few hours but when I get back home to a computer I'll address unknown and Lowell's recent posts. Both crap for different reasons.

Frogger....what is there to like a lot from Lowell's catch up post?

I like it enough to...

VOTE: Lowell

Fro99er · Post Post #1186 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:22 am

Oh hai sheep

Alisae · Post Post #1187 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:23 am

Lowell I REALLY feel like you're posturing over the Wheme slot.

Fro99er · Post Post #1188 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:23 am

In post 1185, havingfitz wrote:Frogger....what is there to like a lot from Lowell's catch up post?

His points on you and Ali.

Lowell · Post Post #1189 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:23 am

Whoa there's that powerwagon I wanted! Not quite where I wanted it though.

Lowell · Post Post #1190 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:24 am

In post 1187, Alisae wrote:Lowell I REALLY feel like you're posturing over the Wheme slot.

Meaning what? I do or I don't want to lynch him?

Fro99er · Post Post #1191 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:25 am

In post 1182, ChaosOmega wrote:
In post 1126, Fro99er wrote:Chaos -- don't out your role or anything. Just let us know if you can do something to sort Wheme tonight.

If it is, then wheme should target Chaos so he protects Chaos from a kill and Chaos can do his power thing to sort wheme.

If it's not, then I say we let the night play out and lynch in the non-claimed-PRs.
Does me answering yes to this question change your lynch pool? If so, in what ways?

Now that I've answered you, answer whether your role can sort wheme *tonight*

Cooperative Sheep · Post Post #1192 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:26 am

In post 1186, Fro99er wrote:Oh hai sheep

Hello - I guess me being gone from the thread for 20 hours was just heartrending to everyone.
Not that people are reacting to what I said last, nor to what I just did.
Except for fitz. I'll choose to like fitz.
Be like fitz, frogg.

Alisae · Post Post #1193 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:27 am

Lowell it's like "Ehhhh, if it got to deadline I guess I'd lynch him." Like I just sorta don't like that stance.

Fro99er · Post Post #1194 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:27 am

In post 1192, Cooperative Sheep wrote:
In post 1186, Fro99er wrote:Oh hai sheep
Hello - I guess me being gone from the thread for 20 hours was just heartrending to everyone.
Not that people are reacting to what I said last, nor to what I just did.
Except for fitz. I'll choose to like fitz.
Be like fitz, frogg.

I'm waiting for Chaos to answer my question.

ChaosOmega · Post Post #1195 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:28 am

In post 1184, Fro99er wrote:Yes -- it means I am not lynching you or Wheme, and I'd even probably avoid a Lowell lynch because if you can sort wheme tonight then in some ways that helps sort hawk, so there's less need to lynch Lowell for information about if he and hawk are a team.In that case I'd lynch Alisae in a heartbeat.Are you answering yes?

Not lynching me or Wheme is no different from me answering no, where you said you would avoid claimed PR's.

The only tangible difference it seems like then is that Lowell is less likely for you and Alisae is more likely, but I don't see any way an Alisae lynch takes off. So on my end, there seems to be no reason to clarify? Let me know if there is something I missed.

Fro99er · Post Post #1196 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:28 am

Answer the fucking question CO

Fro99er · Post Post #1197 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:28 am

Not answering me is a fucking scumclaim.

Fro99er · Post Post #1198 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:30 am

It makes all the sense in the world to know if we can rely on you to sort Wheme. If we can, a Lowell lynch makes no sense and I will actively oppose it.

If we can't, I will actively push an Alisae lynch whether there's other support for it or not.

Fro99er · Post Post #1199 (ISO) » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:31 am

Also, for as much as sheep and chaos have been tied together this day phase, I find it weird they popped into this thread at the exact same time, especially given scum have daytalk.