Spoiler: LUV post
In post 895, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I felt he should be voting for one of those two based on his 683, 703, 767, 793, and 797. It sounds like he doesn't believe that RC is a PR at all or understands what motivation RC had to do what he was doing Day 1. It also sounds like he believes Keyser is fence sitting.In post 866, Cooperative Sheep wrote:That's cool, I consider them the same thingIn post 822, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I don't really do cases, just reasons:
How come this? (I can understand your other points)In post 822, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I don't like how he opened today, feels like he should be voting for RC or Keyser.
Do you feel Transcend is town or null?In post 822, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:As to why I didn't sheep you on to Transcend is because I don't really have a read on your slot and from what I remember of D1, Transcend didn't come off as scummy.
Correct me if I'm wrong - you created a town read off Vifam due to the play being so terrible as to be unwise for scum to do (which it was).In post 828, Keyser Söze wrote:Wouldn't that just make him a bad/illogical player as opposed to scum?
Exclusive of alignment, it was an illogical progression of opinion-meditation-action. I.e his actions did not complement his perspective.
I would think that getting a scum read off of it is an equally valid opinion (play so terrible it is unwise for town to do - which it was).
At that point, if his logic here is empty, isn't yours equally empty?
Also, could you expand on why you logic Transcend as town? I understood your reasoning on RC and Vifam, but you offered none on Transcend.
I don't think it's fair to say that people are ignoring him. Two of his points are;In post 863, mattblackguy wrote:Oh and as far as JarJar goes his push on RC is towniest thing I've seen so far on day 2. The tone was genuine, and all his points so far toward RC are valid concerns yet everyone is ignoring him.
1. RC fake claims cop as scum.
2. RC's "fake" claim is countered by the Gerry flip.
I know I and at least one other person addressed #2 noting that it wasn't a direct counter claim in any way.
I know at least one person addressed #1 noting it is within RC's town meta to fakeclaim cop just as much as within his scum meta - making the play maybe bad, but not a good alignment tell.
What other points of JarJar's do you find good that people are ignoring?
What about the above equates to ignoring?
I'll agree that people aren't agreeing with him - is that what you meant to say? If so, what about his concerns do you find valid in the face of the counter arguments offered against it?
Transcend is null for me.
This is also a town post by LUV.
