Micro 680: Matrix6 No Reveal (Game Over!?)

Transcend · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 2:47 pm

1. Page top

2. The Hamster was scummy

Alisae · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 2:50 pm

In post 50, Transcend wrote:2. The Hamster was scummy

Transcend · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 2:55 pm

In post 51, Alisae wrote:
In post 50, Transcend wrote:2. The Hamster was scummy

21

Aristophanes · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:00 pm

In post 52, Transcend wrote:
In post 51, Alisae wrote:
In post 50, Transcend wrote:2. The Hamster was scummy
21

Indeed, clearly over analyzing way too early in the game.

Alisae · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:01 pm

Their join date:
Joined: January 25, 2017

Aristophanes · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:17 pm

Hammy, are you new to the site?
Are you new to Mafia in general?

Transcend · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:19 pm

In post 54, Alisae wrote:Their join date:
Joined: January 25, 2017

So what

The post was bad

Why are you defending this slot

Aristophanes · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:22 pm

In post 56, Transcend wrote:
In post 54, Alisae wrote:Their join date:
Joined: January 25, 2017
So what

The post was bad

Why are you defending this slot

Dammit, you beat me to this! I was gonna wait for a Hamswer first.

Alisae · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:26 pm

They want to start analyzing things to get us out of RVS.
I don't see how getting us out of RVS is a bad thing.
Plus I figured it was the kind of post that would get scum to jump onto them like dogs to a bone.

Transcend · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:30 pm

VOTE: alisae

Alisae · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:30 pm

Give the hamster a chance to defend themselves.

Alisae · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:31 pm

Wait a minute, let me go re-read page one.

Transcend · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:33 pm

Lol?

You seem really disturbed by one measly vote from me on a slot that made a scummy intro. I have no idea why that bothers you, in fact i feel it doesn't and you're just putting on an act.

Alisae · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:35 pm

Also if Hammster was scum, it would be quite ballsy to put them at L-2 the way they did.
They would get a lot of attention which I dunno if they would exactly want if they were scum.

pedit: Trans Echo sheeped you.

Alisae · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:37 pm

and now you're jumping to the conclusion that what I'm doing is just an act?
Oh please. That sounds like one hell of a reach to me.
Why can't I just be a townie defending another townie?

Transcend · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:40 pm

In post 63, Alisae wrote:Also if Hammster was scum, it would be quite ballsy to put them at L-2 the way they did.
They would get a lot of attention which I dunno if they would exactly want if they were scum.

So, lemme get this straight

Unless this is an alt and you're applying meta to it, you're giving meta to a slot you have absolutely no discernable way of giving plausible meta to?

Alisae · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 3:42 pm

No I'm just looking at it from a newb!scum perspective.
If hamster was newb!scum he would make more time into deciding if he wanted to put shannon at L-2.
I feel they would be more careful about it.

How would I know that it's an alt? And even if I did guess correctly on it being an alt, how would I know who the alt belonged to?

Transcend · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:01 pm

The L-2 is one thing Alisae

The wall of bullshit to candy coat his vote is another.

Do you not scum read the content from it?

Transcend · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:33 pm

Ok Alisae is caughtscum

Can you believe it?

I caught scum 3 pages into the game!

Too bad we won't see his red role PM until post game.

Alisae · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:36 pm

In post 11, karnos wrote:VOTE: shannon

Scum determined via careful statistical analysis.

In post 14, Alisae wrote:Early game wagons :O
VOTE: shannon

In post 21, Prof Hamm T Smiggles III wrote:I know this is random voting stage but if I had to pick scum right now it would be Shannon. I think she is trying too hard to act casual and talk about things that don't have anything to do with this game. Contrast that to Transcend, who asks about pineapple pizza (delicious!) but in a jokey kind of way that doesn't look like he is trying to convince us that he is harmless.

I think Echo is rude and shouldn't have said that to Alisae. Hopefully they are friends and this is kind-hearted banter.

VOTE: Shannon

In post 22, Transcend wrote:[::|::]'s

Pedit: didn't know the person who just posted was in the game but VOTE: shannon

L-1 lol

Lol tbh I forgot I was going to reply to this.

Firstly why are you asking me to take it out of context? If we take it out of context yes, it looks scummy. If we take it out of context it would just be a vote, not the vote that put the hamster at L-2.
Context matters.

Transcend · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:41 pm

Aristophanes · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:43 pm

In post 70, Transcend wrote:What

I think the quotes were a mistake (love the Q+ system...) and that it was a response to this

Transcend wrote:The L-2 is one thing Alisae

The wall of bullshit to candy coat his vote is another.

Do you not scum read the content from it?

Alisae · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:44 pm

don't mind the quotes, I had the multiquoted for some reason from like an hour ago.

Either way you're asking me to take the content out of context, like from the person who's writing it.
Is it sus? Yes.
Could it be coming from town? Yes.
Could it be coming from scum? Yes.

I don't see why that post is coming from scum.

pedit the quotes were just a mistake.

Transcend · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:50 pm

In post 72, Alisae wrote:don't mind the quotes, I had the multiquoted for some reason from like an hour ago.

Either way you're asking me to take the content out of context, like from the person who's writing it.
Is it sus? Yes.
Could it be coming from town? Yes.
Could it be coming from scum? Yes.

I don't see why that post is coming from scum.

pedit the quotes were just a mistake.

Aristophanes · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:55 pm

In post 72, Alisae wrote:don't mind the quotes, I had the multiquoted for some reason from like an hour ago.

Either way you're asking me to take the content out of context, like from the person who's writing it.
Is it sus? Yes.
Could it be coming from town? Yes.
Could it be coming from scum? Yes.

I don't see why that post is coming from scum.

pedit the quotes were just a mistake.

So, which do you think it is coming from, with context, and then without context?