How? Lover is an awful role, pretty much forcing that player to choose whatever the other option is.In post 251, Charloux wrote:Discarded roles like treestump and lover don't tell anything.
Yeah lets get that guy!In post 253, Charloux wrote:Exactly! He had to take the other role, but what the other role was can't be determined. I'd say it's 50% for town and 50% for scum.
You are right. Not trivial town but trivial 3rd party roles like jester and lyncher, that don't threaten town wincon might be fun and challenging to play than having a potent town role.In post 246, alban wrote:Why is it more fun to be a trivial town?
Not reallyIn post 256, Spade_Ace wrote:You are right. Not trivial town but trivial 3rd party roles like jester and lyncher, that don't threaten town wincon might be fun and challenging to play than having a potent town role.In post 246, alban wrote:Why is it more fun to be a trivial town?
It's harder than you think.In post 258, Spade_Ace wrote:Really? I would have loved to play as jester and try to get people to lynch me.
An early mason claim like that is far more likely to be fake. If fake it's likely to be ignored, and if it's ignored, then voting the claimed partner is NAI.In post 240, -Grey- wrote:BECAUSE YOU VOTED THE DUDE I CLAIMED TO BE MASONS WITH, GENIUSIn post 239, bangthemafia wrote:When did i say its NAI in my post? I just said that why would town claim so early and expose other townies too. Having said this, I dont really think its AI. But my point is that I haf not voiced that in my post and you dont know me so how did you conclude that?
All assumptions! Great!! I know where you come from, Mr Know it all troll!!! You beat Kain Tepes and Transcend!!In post 40, -Grey- wrote:I'd legit like to see a bangthemafia wagon.
The way he raged at me for my claim and then put out a flaccid RC vote, he was hoping to spark a wagon on me but didn't want the blowback of doing it himself.
@RC plz explain this
As much as I hate trolls like Grey, this post is super townie. A scum would start getting allies towards a lynch- whether a third party or townie or other scum faction. So Grey's attempts look genuine scumhunting. But your style is horrible dude!In post 112, -Grey- wrote:The thing is, if he's a lyncher with a scum target, lynching you would be win/win.In post 106, RadiantCowbells wrote:Counteroffer:In post 97, -Grey- wrote:If he's a lyncher, we can just ignore him.
We need to find scum, not impotent third party.
He's blatantly acting like 3p lyncher on me in order to mask the fact that he's actually scum and lead us to that point of view.
If he's 3rd party he's a non-town and a valuable lynch anyway. let's get rid of him.
I'd rather sort my read on you than lynch a TP simply for being TP.
@bang, you stopped too soonIn post 121, -Grey- wrote:We ride together.In post 119, RadiantCowbells wrote:I was busy talking about other people's alignments. Don't worry I got you covered now fam.
We die together.
Bad boys for life.
VOTE: Not_Mafia
It's 11 friggin pages.... of mostly non-sense! Join the game!In post 191, Kop wrote:8 pages to read. I shall do that once I am finished with work this afternoon.
Why do you want to even announce that you win when town wins? You are basically softclaiming a townie PR that someone can zero down from the role PM list- I am not even intersted in that right now. My point is, and thats why I got agitated when Grey claimed in RVS, that in a multiple scum faction game (and this is my first ever), each scum would want to eliminate others. By announcing your town alignment you make it easy for them.In post 198, Spade_Ace wrote:That wasn't an actual dare. I was trying to convey that I have a role that can be easily verified as town.In post 193, alban wrote:This can easily happen. Though I understand your exasoeration.In post 71, Spade_Ace wrote:@grey and vaxkiller I dare you both to get me lynched today.In post 62, Vaxkiller wrote:You are saying your role is "Wild Card"In post 60, Spade_Ace wrote:I still didn't understand what your point is. I discarded alien prober, kept wildcard. Was given the new role when the game started.
But it appears that i was mistaken on the actual power of my role and cant be verified.
My role is weird. I win when town wins. But my power is anti-town. Dont know what to do with that.
Please try to act civilized. All of us are here to play and hav fun, not to hear some abusive troll.In post 210, -Grey- wrote:Motherfucker, I'll votepark you out of spite of you don't shut the fuck up.
No. I dont think you are a scum. So I may not vote for you. But some more of your abusiveness and I swear I will report to either mod or site admin and get you blocked. Do you get that? We are all strangers and lets behave with some basic courtsey and civilized manners.In post 219, -Grey- wrote:So in your little worldview, scum tries to win by being assholes and pissing people off, right?In post 213, alban wrote:Is this how they vent anger in where to come from?In post 210, -Grey- wrote:Motherfucker, I'll votepark you out of spite of you don't shut the fuck up.
Stop swearing. I am serious.
VOTE: Grey
Voting me for any other excuse than thinking I am scum is basically admitting to playing to a scum wincon, so I'm sure you'll find some way to call me scum because I used a dirty word.
Let's hear it.
2 things to note hereIn post 269, bangthemafia wrote: My point is, and thats why I got agitated when Grey claimed in RVS, that in a multiple scum faction game (and this is my first ever), each scum would want to eliminate others.
So you thought I was seriously claiming... which is I was, that also meant RC was a mason... bit you voted RC, who you thought was a mason because of my claim... which proves that you obviously did not beloved my claim to be outing town pr'sIn post 265, bangthemafia wrote:I "raged" at you coz I thought you were seriously claiming. I RVSed RC coz I thought you could actually be an idiot townie claiming in RVS.
Hi Charl, I can see where you are getting at. Yes, this is my first game with possibilities of multiple scum factions. The only game I have played on MS, as you know, had a SK. I thought unlike SK who is a loner and so doesn't have to worry about giving away associations, scum factions would be more wary of the other factions because they have to worry that their partnerships are not apparent. So I thought scum parties would be actively hunting for buddying, partnering to find out and eliminate other scums.In post 270, Charloux wrote:2 things to note hereIn post 269, bangthemafia wrote: My point is, and thats why I got agitated when Grey claimed in RVS, that in a multiple scum faction game (and this is my first ever), each scum would want to eliminate others.
1)This isn't your first multiball.
2)How do you know it's a multiball? You would only know that if you were a 3rd party(jester/lyncher) that can't exist without scum(mafia, ww etc.)
Hey Gamma, welcome!In post 271, Aristodog wrote:Two fold
1. Treat others the way you would want to be treated. If you like being treated like shit, then don't be an asshole.
2. Please welcome Gamma Emerald as he replaces culted effective immediately! I'll update the table when I'm home from the auto store.
