Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

[hasdgfas]

Yeah, but he's at least talking, and we can still get him tomorrow. TS doesn't seem to be here to defend herself. We can make the mod's job a lot easier if we lynch someone that scummy today. Peers will still be here tomorrow unless he's vigged or something.

[Erg0]

I don't find TS particularly scummy, and I think she's only been brought under the spotlight by MoS and Quagmire's policy crap. She also has a similar opinion of Peers to mine. Hence, I am unlikely to lynch her even (especially) in her absence.

This has all the hallmarks of a classic Day 1 "we're bored, let's lynch a lurker" wagon. Get TS replaced if you must, don't lynch her just to make the decision easier.

[Peers]

Yeah, but he's at least talking, and we can still get him tomorrow. TS doesn't seem to be here to defend herself. We can make the mod's job a lot easier if we lynch someone that scummy today. Peers will still be here tomorrow unless he's vigged or something.

You know, some people might see that as 'trying to direct the vig' and call it scummy. But then, perhaps I'm just descending into generalities by pointing out something potentially useful to the town instead of arguing and calling people names and whatnot.

[Erg0]

Yeah, that must be what I meant.

[hasdgfas]

I was attempting to state a possibility. I don't care what the (possibly nonexistant) vig does, I was pointing out that that was one of the few ways you wouldn't be here tomorrow.

[Quagmire]

I don't find TS particularly scummy, and I think she's only been brought under the spotlight by MoS and Quagmire's policy crap. She also has a similar opinion of Peers to mine. Hence, I am unlikely to lynch her even (especially) in her absence.

This has all the hallmarks of a classic Day 1 "we're bored, let's lynch a lurker" wagon. Get TS replaced if you must, don't lynch her just to make the decision easier.

I've outlined good reasons on why I think she's scum that have nothing to do with a policy.

[Peers]

Unvote

Vote: Toaster

At this point, it's the best option available. Nobody bust ABR sees hasdgfas as scummy, and maybe that should be a warning sign. Whereas TS has been scummy and then gone all lurky... like, more lurky than even I've been.

[Albert B. Rampage]

TS is on V/L/A

[Peers]

..... Okay, that's a good reason. I guess TS just posted a whole lot ot other games in the two days between the last post to this one and V/L/A.

Unvote

[Erg0]

I don't find TS particularly scummy, and I think she's only been brought under the spotlight by MoS and Quagmire's policy crap. She also has a similar opinion of Peers to mine. Hence, I am unlikely to lynch her even (especially) in her absence.

This has all the hallmarks of a classic Day 1 "we're bored, let's lynch a lurker" wagon. Get TS replaced if you must, don't lynch her just to make the decision easier.

I've outlined good reasons on why I think she's scum that have nothing to do with a policy.

I meant that nobody was really paying any attention to her until MoS (in particular) voted her on policy. Regardless of your position now, I think that many of the voters on her are just taking the soft option.

[Peers]

Vote: Mert

Reason: Hasn't posted since November 10th, yet hasn't been replaced. Hardcore lurking.

[Battle Mage]

Mert is away atm unfortunately. Shame-he was the reason i joined this game. But yeh, he needs replacement.

[zu_Faul]

If you want to lynch a lurker, there's KScope.

[Peers]

Unvote

Dammit. Can someone tell me which lurkers -aren't- away, on vacation, sick, injured, out of the country, incarcerated, abducted, or otherwise have a legit reason to not be here?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Ya know what, let's lynch Peers and end the day.

[Peers]

Lynching Peers would be a bad thing. Trust the only one who knows.

[schismatized]

Lynching Peers would be a bad thing. Trust the only one who knows.

The one says you die.

vote peers

[Mastermind of Sin]

I don't find TS particularly scummy, and I think she's only been brought under the spotlight by MoS and Quagmire's policy crap. She also has a similar opinion of Peers to mine. Hence, I am unlikely to lynch her even (especially) in her absence.

This has all the hallmarks of a classic Day 1 "we're bored, let's lynch a lurker" wagon. Get TS replaced if you must, don't lynch her just to make the decision easier.

I'm not voting TS based on policy.

[Toaster Strudel]

I don't find TS particularly scummy, and I think she's only been brought under the spotlight by MoS and Quagmire's policy crap. She also has a similar opinion of Peers to mine. Hence, I am unlikely to lynch her even (especially) in her absence.

This has all the hallmarks of a classic Day 1 "we're bored, let's lynch a lurker" wagon. Get TS replaced if you must, don't lynch her just to make the decision easier.

I'm not voting TS based on policy.

Have I neglected to ask for replacement in this game, or do we have a slow mod?

MoS, you win, I lose. You and Quagmire have been successful, at last, at removing any enjoyment I had playing this game, by taking the game out of it. I have better things to do than lock swords with children, no disrespect meant to childhood in general. It's unbecoming to a woman my age.

I hope you find this game much more fun and lively now that I am gone, and have stopped sucking the fun out of it, which is the reason why you have embarked in this tiresome policy lynch business that you deny, but continue to carry out - even after I've been replaced.

I am finishing a couple of minis and a normal (as DGB) to honor cross-replacement deals that I have made. And I'll finish modding Food Fight Mafia, and maybe I'll even mod another similar game since it's being wildly enjoyed by the players.

I am done with the playing.

Don't answer in this thread, at least don't answer for my benefit, because I'm not going to reply.

[Mastermind of Sin]

For fuck's sake, how many times do I have to say that I'm not policy voting for you to get it through your head.

[JordanA24]

For fuck's sake, how many times do I have to say that I'm not policy voting for you to get it through your head.

Unvote, Vote: Toaster Strudel

Metagame policy to lynch TS in every game until I see some useful posts instead of random ranting that doesn't even contain logic.

OK, that's not the entire reason why you're voting TS, but is was the base of it. MOS, if TS wasn't such a "funsucker" as you say she is, would you be voting her now on the current evidence you have against her?

Feels like first page again. Stop fooling around, ABR is not the one we're looking for today.

posts like this make me want to put the noose around your neck. But, i'll humour you. Why are so sure that ABR is town?

While we're asking questions, why do you think he's scum?

I don't like how you ducked BM's question here zu_faul.

Who are you going to vote now ?

Why don't you suggest some people to vote for?

vote: toaster strudel

it seems to be the consensus at this point and I'm not saddened by this lynch.

FOS: hasgdfas

Voting because the target is a popular choice=Very scummy. Actually, just before this, you posted:

we need more pressure on peers.

Floating between the two biggest bandwagons, bumps it up into an

Unvote Vote: hasgdfas

Yeah, but he's at least talking, and we can still get him tomorrow. TS doesn't seem to be here to defend herself. We can make the mod's job a lot easier if we lynch someone that scummy today. Peers will still be here tomorrow unless he's vigged or something.

Well, I had slight doubts about voting you before this posts, but those doubts are now definatly quashed. Putting a vote on someone who isn't here is highly opportunistic, since they can't defend themselves from your vote, so you aren't questioned for it. And since you are the 4th vote on TS, if she was lynched, you'd be around the midpoint of the bandwagon, and not held too accountable for it, so it's the perfect opportunistic scum vote.

I don't find TS particularly scummy, and I think she's only been brought under the spotlight by MoS and Quagmire's policy crap.

This is QFT, particularly the last part.

[hasdgfas]

Well, I'm fine with a Peers lynch or a TS lynch, and I have been for a while. I thought Peers needed more pressure until ABR pointed out that Peers had already claimed, so I switched to TS since she was another lynch I would have been fine with.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Why don't you suggest some people to vote for?

As you can see, I am doing just that by voting the same person as you.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Jordan, did you fucking miss the long period of time where I

unvoted TS and voted you because I wasn't going to policy lynch her

??? Did you also miss the part where I made a case against her and revoted for completely separate reasons that had nothing to do with a policy lynch?

I AM NOT VOTING TOASTER STRUDEL BASED ON ANY SORT OF POLICY OR OUT OF GAME INFLUENCE. I AM NOT DOING THIS IN

ANY

OF MY GAMES WITH HER, NOR AM/WILL I DO IT TO HER ALTERNATE ACCOUNT, DRIPPINGGOOFBALL

Get that through your fucking head.

[Quagmire]

Jordan, did you fucking miss the long period of time where I

unvoted TS and voted you because I wasn't going to policy lynch her

??? Did you also miss the part where I made a case against her and revoted for completely separate reasons that had nothing to do with a policy lynch?

I AM NOT VOTING TOASTER STRUDEL BASED ON ANY SORT OF POLICY OR OUT OF GAME INFLUENCE. I AM NOT DOING THIS IN

ANY

OF MY GAMES WITH HER, NOR AM/WILL I DO IT TO HER ALTERNATE ACCOUNT, DRIPPINGGOOFBALL

Get that through your fucking head.

This applies to me as well.