~laundry~ FIN

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #525 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:21 pm

In post 518, Fro99er wrote:
In post 516, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 509, Fro99er wrote:Can we L-1 and derphammer SAD. I want to see tammy's reaction to that.
Hmmm

are you actually scum.
Not at all.

Great,

explain your scumread on me.

Firebringer · Post Post #526 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:21 pm

In post 521, Fro99er wrote:WTF FIRE

I have things to do, see you later towel friend.

Fro99er · Post Post #527 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:22 pm

Someone should hammer SAD pretty please then Tammy would have to do battle with me.

Tammy · Post Post #528 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:22 pm

VOTE: frogger

Fro99er · Post Post #529 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:23 pm

In post 525, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Great,explain your scumread on me.

LOL I've been explaining it all game dude.

Firebringer · Post Post #530 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:23 pm

VOTE: tammy

Fro99er · Post Post #531 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:23 pm

In post 528, Tammy wrote:VOTE: frogger

BRING IT ON

Fro99er · Post Post #532 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:24 pm

Fire can we do SAD and let me battle it out with Tammy later.

Fro99er · Post Post #533 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:24 pm

LOOK AT ME LINING UP LYNCHES

Errantparabola · Post Post #534 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:25 pm

Votecount 1.6

I wish I had some flavor to contribute, but I don't.
Just pretend one of Toogeloo's images is here instead.
Also everyone be nice, smooch

Ser Arthur Dayne

(7): Aeronaut, Fro99er, Pine, Andrius, drealmerz7, SlySly, gerryoat

drealmerz7

(2): Zachstralkita, MariaR

Firebringer

(2): Nosferatu, Ser Arthur Dayne

Fro99er

(1): Tammy

MariaR

(1): Desperado

Pine

(1): Toogeloo

Tammy

(1): Firebringer

Not Voting

(2): Creature, Nachomamma8

17 players, 9 majority.

Deadline in (expired on 2017-02-01 17:30:00)

Tammy · Post Post #535 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:25 pm

What is seriously wrong with you frogger?

Why does mr oh I'm too weakhearted to have someone joke about me throwing my scummy in their face trying to actually start a fight? Why wouldn't a town you want to work with me?

Like what the fuck is your problem???

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #536 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:26 pm

In post 529, Fro99er wrote:
In post 525, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Great,explain your scumread on me.
LOL I've been explaining it all game dude.

Great, where, point specifically:

Spoiler:

In post 7, Fro99er wrote:WAAAAHHHHHH I HATE MY PM

WAAAHHHHH

VOTE: Aero

Not RVS

In post 10, Fro99er wrote:I see what you did there

In post 48, Fro99er wrote:OH MY GOD CAN WE STOP ALL THIS MOIST TALK OR I WILL CRY

In post 51, Fro99er wrote:
In post 50, Aeronaut wrote:This game is amazing
This game sucks and it makes me want to cry already

UUUUUGGGGGHHHH

In post 55, Fro99er wrote:VOTE: Gerryoat

In post 57, Fro99er wrote:Don't be dumb slysly join the wagon

In post 68, Fro99er wrote:These miller votes are all weaksauce.

Vote the obvsock

In post 89, Fro99er wrote:WHY THE FUCK ARE WE ALL TALKING SO WEEEEEIRD I HATE IT WAAAAHHHHH

EP THIS GAME STINKS SO MUCH I NEED NOSE JAMMER

In post 120, Fro99er wrote:
In post 119, Firebringer wrote:N0 peeks can't be on socks.

Desperado must be a real miller
Orly?

In post 11, Zachstralkita wrote:n0 guilty peek Creature

VOTE: Creature
Fake guilty. Zack's a sock with Gerry.

In post 131, Fro99er wrote:VOTE: Ser Arthur Dayne

In post 251, Fro99er wrote:I think tammy is a moist towelette

I think

In post 254, Fro99er wrote:Desperado votes are the worst votes.

DONT MAKE ME KICK AND SCREAM AND CRY OH OHLY SHIT DESPERADO LIVES IN RALEIGH?

In post 264, Fro99er wrote:I'm already voting SAD but I'd double vote SAD if I could.

Screw it...let's double vote SAD

VOTE: SAD
VOTE: SAD

In post 270, Fro99er wrote:WWAAAAAHHHH THIS MOD HATES ME WITH THIS TERRIBLE TIMING FOR A VOTE COUNT

I'M OBVIOUSLY NOT A DOUBLE VOTER WAAAAHHHH STUPID MOD I WANTED TO HAVE FUN WITH THAT FOR A BIT

In post 273, Fro99er wrote:
In post 265, Pine wrote:I'm thinking a SAD vote is justified, but let's have this discussion first.
I'm fine with a mass flavor claim.

I just cannot talk about one part of mine, period. You're going to have to believe me on this or bad things will happen to this towel.

In post 303, Fro99er wrote:
In post 284, Andrius wrote:You don't need to baby me. I know you went to bed. I didn't mean to be like SHES NOT HERE SHES SCUM it was a SHES NOT HERE.
What was the "wut" part for after the "She was here for pages 1-2 and is gone."

In post 305, Fro99er wrote:
In post 296, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Holy Tammy's posts feel so so so off.
Holy sock

In post 307, Fro99er wrote:
In post 288, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Yeah Andrius is scum prob.

In post 296, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Holy Tammy's posts feel so so so off.
So do you think Andy is weakly bussing Tammy by saying her posts feel off (a line which you then repeated)?

In post 310, Fro99er wrote:
In post 309, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Aeronaut is town
Explain

In post 313, Fro99er wrote:
In post 161, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Aero is town btw.

In post 164, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 163, Andrius wrote:
In post 161, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Aero is town btw.
For what?
Moistness.
That's not an explanation, buddy.

In post 318, Fro99er wrote:
In post 312, drealmerz7 wrote:
In post 308, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:No I don't make relationship tells before a flip are you on drugs I rank people independently.

Why do I have to explain this to people every game.
drives me nuts too

I keep the assocation possibilities in mind and completely fluid, but they should almost never be a point of discussion

"how can you be voting your top SR who is voting your 2nd SR?" - uh because that's how it makes sense play the game?
I always make a point to ask for later.

That's how I bust people and how I play. Always will. Don't care if you don't like it, it's not gonna change. Just ask Tammy in MAFIACEPTION I used this tactic to figure out Pepto/Molla and Titus and Tammy pulled Ranger out a loop and it was glorious.

In post 320, Fro99er wrote:
In post 316, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Yeah and what if it's multiball or third-party or anything it's stupid to do association tells before flips.
It's never stupid to do association tells before flips. to use it as your only basis for a scum read is, but not to do it in general as part of a larger picture. But socks ALWAYS scold me on this.

In post 330, Fro99er wrote:
In post 321, Tammy wrote:
In post 179, MariaR wrote:Do one of you have a fucking modifier that makes you say the word moist I wouldn't be shocked at this point
I'm gonna stomp no your throat and watch as you choke on your own blood watching the life drain from your eyes if you keep using that word
S-so just be careful! *giggle*

Okay this has been bugging me all morning. Why did you refer to it as a modifier?
I don't see the issue with this...

In post 341, Fro99er wrote:I think people are reading far too much into this modifier talk.

In post 351, Fro99er wrote:
In post 347, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:I'm not
really
pre-empting you as a scumread I said I have you as lean scum because your early posts felt super wishy wash.

But I can get a read on you later anyway it's not like OMG TAMMY IS SCUM LYNCH HER WITH FIRE.
I don't think the word really was needed there. Like, I'm not pre-empting you as a scum read so much as I'm doing X...but I am a bit pre-empting you as a scumread.

It would have read find without the really.

In post 354, Fro99er wrote:
In post 352, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:focus purely on the moist part knowing it has no bearing to wincon.
How do we know it doesn't? What did I miss.

In post 356, Fro99er wrote:
In post 355, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:Because I have it and it doesn't...
Right but why can't scum have it too?

In post 357, Fro99er wrote:like, how do you know scum has the moist thing if you're town?

In post 359, Fro99er wrote:Guys I'm pretty sure SAD just scumslipped

In post 364, Fro99er wrote:
In post 363, Tammy wrote:But this description is right. SAD didn't scum slip with it. The moist is just a modifier that has nothing to do with alignment or wincon, it's just a little mini game to amuse the mod.
Gotcha, at least now multiple people confirm.

In post 366, Fro99er wrote:
In post 363, Tammy wrote:That maria immediately jumped to it being a modifier is bugging me.
Why? It doesn't bug me. At all.

In post 379, Fro99er wrote:
In post 372, Tammy wrote:
In post 366, Fro99er wrote:
In post 363, Tammy wrote:That maria immediately jumped to it being a modifier is bugging me.
Why? It doesn't bug me. At all.
It bugs me because she doesn't have the modifier or else she would have used it. She wouldn't have said "it wouldn't surprise me if you guys have a modifier with moist in it", which would mean she has it.

My thought is that if you see someone constantly using the word moist, my first thought would be to jump to it being a post restriction of some kind. But it's referred to as a modifier, and it concerns me that she has seen it referred to as such.

Is there a reason why you can't just let her answer?
I'm just saying I can understand why she specifically phrased it that way. She's probably not the only one who could have...

In post 381, Fro99er wrote:
In post 367, drealmerz7 wrote:
In post 355, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 354, Fro99er wrote:
In post 352, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:focus purely on the moist part knowing it has no bearing to wincon.
How do we know it doesn't? What did I miss.
Because I have it and it doesn't...
uhhhhh, then why did you ask about it?
Did this get answered yet?

In post 383, Fro99er wrote:
In post 382, Tammy wrote:True it could just be a coincidence, but I'm not going to not ask about something that pings me to see if it leads me somewhere anywhere.Imagine if you have something in your role pm, you know other people do too, it's not alignment relevant, and someone who does not have it uses the same terminology as used in your role pm, you might just wonder if they'd seen it because scum tend to post their role pms in the scum pt. I'm not sure why I can't follow up on that. It's not a smoking gun or I'd be voting her, It's a this could be a thing and I should ask about it before I dwell on it.
I understand your perspective and I never said you couldn't follow up on it.

I said I can understand why she did that.

IOW, I think you're barking up the wrong tree...not that you didn't have right to. Just that I think you're suspicion is misplaced.

In post 385, Fro99er wrote:Also Dreal is most definitely a towel

In post 384, Fro99er wrote:I'm going to keep my SAD pressure and because he certainly sock pings me, but it's going to be a priority for me to sort SAD/Tammy/MariaR

In post 389, Fro99er wrote:
In post 387, Tammy wrote:I'm town!

Why do you have SAD/Maria on the priority sort list though?
Because I believe one of you or SAD is scum based off that whole last page or two of stuff. Or I could be way off base and it's maria. Because I'm on the fence about you and if you're a towel then I want to trust your maria read. But I don't completely trust you yet which saddens me so much it makes me want to cry WAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH

In post 398, Fro99er wrote:
In post 396, drealmerz7 wrote:
In post 385, Fro99er wrote:Also Dreal is most definitely a towel
dry, moist, wet?
I actually don't know what any of this means.

In post 414, Fro99er wrote:
In post 413, Toogeloo wrote:It is definitely interesting to see some people claim it as a modifier where others see it as the same thing I do, a mini-game that isn't supposed to be game related, and then there are people who seem to be completely unaware of it's part of the game.
I assumed it was a modifier and was unaware it was a game.

In post 418, Fro99er wrote:
In post 351, Fro99er wrote:
In post 347, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:I'm not
really
pre-empting you as a scumread I said I have you as lean scum because your early posts felt super wishy wash.

But I can get a read on you later anyway it's not like OMG TAMMY IS SCUM LYNCH HER WITH FIRE.
I don't think the word really was needed there. Like, I'm not pre-empting you as a scum read so much as I'm doing X...but I am a bit pre-empting you as a scumread.

It would have read find without the really.
This pings me.

Tammy was saying the pre-empting thing about Andy, and SAD chimes in like its about him and uses the word "really" which...really...didn't need to be there.

In post 421, Fro99er wrote:I'm just gonna bring up the SAD really thing every page or two until people tell me it's stupid or it's a thing.

In post 423, Fro99er wrote:Right. She had a feeling ARTHUR was pre-empting her. And you thought it was about you. And then you used "really" like, I'm not really pre-empting you as much as I'm doing X...but I am a bit pre-empting you.

In post 424, Fro99er wrote:
In post 422, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:You are just terrible at this game holy
My town performance banner disagrees.

In post 430, Fro99er wrote:
In post 428, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 423, Fro99er wrote:Right. She had a feeling ARTHUR was pre-empting her. And you thought it was about you. And then you used "really" like, I'm not really pre-empting you as much as I'm doing X...but I am a bit pre-empting you.
Because she calls me Arthur

and I know this fact.

What are you even saying.

I'll take whatever you're on.
aw god dammit.

I misread Arthur and andy

In post 431, Fro99er wrote:At least people could tell me it's stupid.

In post 433, Fro99er wrote:
In post 429, Desperado wrote:That was me preparing to barf @ frogger's "nuh uh I won a scummy!"
Yeah, well it's true. And I led the town there too. So anyone who tells me I'm bad at this will just have to get it thrown in their face.

In post 442, Fro99er wrote:
In post 436, Nachomamma8 wrote:and this is why there's no more best town performance.shame, people. shame.
Welp.

Sorry y'all.

I'll just shut up today.

In post 444, Fro99er wrote:Even if so sounds like I struck a nerve with others.

In post 446, Fro99er wrote:Well I have a weak heart. It's why I left the site in the first place because this site got really toxic for a while.

anyway...back to our regularly scheduled programming of lynching SAD.

In post 470, Fro99er wrote:Fire let's not drag this out come join the wagon

In post 476, Fro99er wrote:
In post 473, Firebringer wrote:
In post 470, Fro99er wrote:Fire let's not drag this out come join the wagon
join what?

wait who am I even voting?
This juicy SAD wagon

In post 492, Fro99er wrote:
In post 488, gerryoat wrote:I'd vote SAD just for saying he has like 7 TRs after 10 troll pages and maybe only 3 legit content pages. but i'll wait

In post 494, Fro99er wrote:
In post 493, Firebringer wrote:Fro99er want to be towel buddies?
That sounds sexy.

I'm game.

In post 501, Fro99er wrote:
In post 499, gerryoat wrote:how many votes on him rn
7

he's at L-2

In post 509, Fro99er wrote:Can we L-1 and derphammer SAD. I want to see tammy's reaction to that.

In post 510, Fro99er wrote:ninja'd theres the L-1

DERPHAMMER PLZ

In post 515, Fro99er wrote:OMG SOMEONE HAMMERZ

FOR THE LOLZ

In post 518, Fro99er wrote:
In post 516, Ser Arthur Dayne wrote:
In post 509, Fro99er wrote:Can we L-1 and derphammer SAD. I want to see tammy's reaction to that.
Hmmm

are you actually scum.
Not at all.

In post 521, Fro99er wrote:WTF FIRE

In post 523, Fro99er wrote:
In post 517, Tammy wrote:Are you guys kidding me???

If he's really at l-1 someone unvote now.

Also my leaning townread on frogger is gone gone gone. No way now how town him pulls this lame as bullshit. Also if Arthur does flip town and you interacted with me nada about it, I'm not listening to anything you have to say the rest of the game.
HAHAHAHA OKAY TRY ME

In post 527, Fro99er wrote:Someone should hammer SAD pretty please then Tammy would have to do battle with me.

Tammy · Post Post #537 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:26 pm

In post 530, Firebringer wrote:VOTE: tammy

You're a funny guy and backing the wrong horse.

There is something seriously wrong with Frogger here.

Fro99er · Post Post #538 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:26 pm

In post 535, Tammy wrote:What is seriously wrong with you frogger?

Why does mr oh I'm too weakhearted to have someone joke about me throwing my scummy in their face trying to actually start a fight? Why wouldn't a town you want to work with me?

Like what the fuck is your problem???

Nothing is wrong with me. I'm trying to eliminate scum. I have nothing personal against you and no problem with you. You're just not town.

Tammy · Post Post #539 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:26 pm

tick fucking tock frogger

what is your problem?

Tammy · Post Post #540 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:28 pm

In post 538, Fro99er wrote:
In post 535, Tammy wrote:What is seriously wrong with you frogger?

Why does mr oh I'm too weakhearted to have someone joke about me throwing my scummy in their face trying to actually start a fight? Why wouldn't a town you want to work with me?

Like what the fuck is your problem???
Nothing is wrong with me. I'm trying to eliminate scum. I have nothing personal against you and no problem with you. You're just not town.

NO U.

I'm as town as they come. I'm sorry your break made you rusty as fuck, but hey guess what you're not getting me lynched and you want to battle me you better bring the big fucking guns.

I'll dance.

Desperado · Post Post #541 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:29 pm

Unvote
Vote: Fro99er

Maria's still scum she's just kind of boring

Fro99er · Post Post #542 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:30 pm

In post 539, Tammy wrote:tick fucking tock frogger

what is your problem?

Like I said, no problem.

I also have no problem with a 1v1, let's go

VOTE: Tammy

Ser Arthur Dayne · Post Post #543 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:31 pm

He's prob VI and I'm prob blacklisting him cuz any mcmenno-looking-alt makes me want to vomit but policy is policy

Vote: Frogger

Fro99er · Post Post #544 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:32 pm

In post 537, Tammy wrote:There is something seriously wrong with Frogger here.

After this game you'll be 1/3 in reading me. I guess MAFIACEPTION was the ex...ception.

Tammy · Post Post #545 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:32 pm

This is not town frogger by the way and if it is I'm disappointed as all hell. i was like yay frogger's playing we worked together really well in mafiaception maybe that will happen again if he's town.

In mafiaception he helped the town worked together and was careful about his reads. He wasn't this lynch happy oh let's lynch someone 24 hours into the game with really lame and not solid reasoning. In fact when he was scum reading ABR, he listened to my read there and when he was discounting it was like Tammy can't listen to you anymore.

This is not that Frogger. i can't imagine a town frogger going let's lynch fast so I can see how tammy reacts let's battle tammy.

If this is what town frogger looks like now color me disappointed as shit.

But you feel more like Bees.

Desperado · Post Post #546 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:32 pm

In post 544, Fro99er wrote:After this game you'll be 1/3 in reading me. I guess MAFIACEPTION was the ex...ception.

...he said, to his scumread?

Fro99er · Post Post #547 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:33 pm

In post 545, Tammy wrote:This is not town frogger by the way and if it is I'm disappointed as all hell. i was like yay frogger's playing we worked together really well in mafiaception maybe that will happen again if he's town.

LOL and you've played with scum frogger.

Scumfrogger is a SUPER TRYHARD. Remember BEES.

BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Tammy · Post Post #548 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:33 pm

Yeah I underestimated you in bees because you were so new, but if you remember I said if you were scum you were scum with your brother and that's why you feel so confident.

I'm sorry you're not town.

Fro99er · Post Post #549 (ISO) » Thu Jan 19, 2017 12:34 pm

In post 548, Tammy wrote:I'm sorry you're not town.

I'm sorry you're either wrong or scum.

Probably scum.