In post 3693, Pepchoninga wrote:
Your claim is nothing without another one, sorry. Everytime I've read masons claims and it is not a lie it has come in a pair.
Without that, your claim just seems like a scum trying to take pressure off.
Taking pressure of by painting a huge X on his back for the other scumteam to kill him. Sounds legit.
Fixed quote.
Gives me a pagetop feel.
-S
Last edited by inspectorscout on Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
Pep, Jaack is at L-3. It's inevitable. You better join us now.
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
Pep, I understand how Masons work. I've nodded games with masons, and oh hey I'm playing one now. You've already demonstrated that you are oblivious to some obvious things in game, but I'll say it again here: it's bad to out Masons. I get that I'm not 100% Proven. Even with full mason outing I won't be 100%. But as Masons, it will force scum to kill us or we'll win for town late game. With masons outed, they won't have to guess or hunt for us. So unless it saves a mason from hanging from the rope, you're not getting the claim. And a lynch isn't happening. So be useful on a different scum read of yours and let me die in my sleep. Thanks.
In post 3703, Fro99er wrote:Pep, Jaack is at L-3. It's inevitable. You better join us now.
gut feeling.
> Jack will claim PR
> people will unvote being scared.
> We are in the same place as we were a few days ago
> We are on on pace for 5087 posts
I lol'd
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
In post 3704, Clumsy wrote:Pep, I understand how Masons work. I've nodded games with masons, and oh hey I'm playing one now. You've already demonstrated that you are oblivious to some obvious things in game, but I'll say it again here: it's bad to out Masons. I get that I'm not 100% Proven. Even with full mason outing I won't be 100%. But as Masons, it will force scum to kill us or we'll win for town late game. With masons outed, they won't have to guess or hunt for us. So unless it saves a mason from hanging from the rope, you're not getting the claim. And a lynch isn't happening. So be useful on a different scum read of yours and let me die in my sleep. Thanks.
You know what's funny? Scum won't bother to lynch the mason when there is only one claim. And that's ok. But it would be best for scum if both masons die. But again even with 2 mason claims scum won't try and target you. Why? Because they can't be certain they won't hit the same mason. So all in all, there is no need for you to say who is the other mason or tell him to claim to.
In post 3693, Pepchoninga wrote:
Your claim is nothing without another one, sorry. Everytime I've read masons claims and it is not a lie it has come in a pair.
Without that, your claim just seems like a scum trying to take pressure off.
Taking pressure of by painting a huge X on his back for the other scumteam to kill him. Sounds legit.
Fixed quote.
Gives me a pagetop feel.
-S
Yeah lol, he does that. He wouldn't have if he claimed with his parthner tho.
Why do people tr Transcend again I haven't seen much that's worth a tr the main reason I did townread him was a very weak "he'd prob do this" moment
he's null but I'm discrediting any tr's on him
Frog pep and Iron are your wagon choices for tomorrow
Stop with tihs "lynchbait/badtown" stuff that's the most awful reason you can ever give
In post 3703, Fro99er wrote:Pep, Jaack is at L-3. It's inevitable. You better join us now.
I'm not sure this is the right lynch for today.
You just said you were going to go with it if it was inevitable.
"I officially announce Fro99er the king of guilties because this is the second time he has guiltied a slot I was really unsure about.
Heil King Froggo.
Ribbit ribbit." -Transcend
In post 3704, Clumsy wrote:Pep, I understand how Masons work. I've nodded games with masons, and oh hey I'm playing one now. You've already demonstrated that you are oblivious to some obvious things in game, but I'll say it again here: it's bad to out Masons. I get that I'm not 100% Proven. Even with full mason outing I won't be 100%. But as Masons, it will force scum to kill us or we'll win for town late game. With masons outed, they won't have to guess or hunt for us. So unless it saves a mason from hanging from the rope, you're not getting the claim. And a lynch isn't happening. So be useful on a different scum read of yours and let me die in my sleep. Thanks.
You know what's funny? Scum won't bother to lynch the mason when there is only one claim. And that's ok. But it would be best for scum if both masons die. But again even with 2 mason claims scum won't try and target you. Why? Because they can't be certain they won't hit the same mason. So all in all, there is no need for you to say who is the other mason or tell him to claim to.
They would have to take a shot eventually, or confirmed town will win. And are you agreeing with me about not outing Masonry? Cool, thanks, vote somewhere else then.