Mini #516: Canyon City - Abandoned

somestrangeflea · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Sun Dec 16, 2007 12:07 am

Elias wrote:I'm also suspicious of SSF for pressuring the phate claim, which is really unnecessary at this point, and only helps scum.

I'm not pressuring for a claim now, I'm saying that yesterday he should have either claimed fully, or not claimed at all. A "town powerrole" claim is an ideal scum cover when under pressure, since they don't have to commit to claiming an actual role, they don't have to risk a possible counterclaim, and it may be enough to shed a couple of votes.

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:11 am

creampuffeater wrote:hi

po something relevant please?

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:11 am

post*

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:39 pm

so um...hey guys. This game's activity level makes me sad.

SSF, I guess I just assumed you were pressuring for the claim when I saw Phates post, I guess thats not the case. Though I would appreciate him posting some more.

YagamiLight · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2007 4:45 pm

I would like to hear from Spambot.

Mod, would it be wrong of me to ask for prod's again? Specifically for Spambot?

Shanba · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 8:37 am

A "town powerrole" claim is an ideal scum cover when under pressure, since they don't have to commit to claiming an actual role, they don't have to risk a possible counterclaim, and it may be enough to shed a couple of votes.

This may or may not be true, but I haven't actually ever seen scum claim this.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:09 am

Shanba wrote:
A "town powerrole" claim is an ideal scum cover when under pressure, since they don't have to commit to claiming an actual role, they don't have to risk a possible counterclaim, and it may be enough to shed a couple of votes.
This may or may not be true, but I haven't actually ever seen scum claim this.

Me neither, but on paper, it's more beneficial for the scum to claim it than for town to, IMO...

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:59 pm

Shanba wrote:
A "town powerrole" claim is an ideal scum cover when under pressure, since they don't have to commit to claiming an actual role, they don't have to risk a possible counterclaim, and it may be enough to shed a couple of votes.
This may or may not be true, but I haven't actually ever seen scum claim this.

I've seen it done by both sides. It's really kind of a null tell as far as I'm concerned.

creampuffeater · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:58 pm

Elias_the_thief wrote:
creampuffeater wrote:hi
po something relevant please?

is this a forced requirement?

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:12 am

No. Its a cordial request. Do you choose to accept?

(Also, its supposed to say post).

creampuffeater · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:13 am

I REFUSE!

Shanba · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 7:53 am

somestrangeflea wrote:
Shanba wrote:
A "town powerrole" claim is an ideal scum cover when under pressure, since they don't have to commit to claiming an actual role, they don't have to risk a possible counterclaim, and it may be enough to shed a couple of votes.
This may or may not be true, but I haven't actually ever seen scum claim this.
Me neither, but on paper, it's more beneficial for the scum to claim it than for town to, IMO...

In which case it's not really very good evidence of him being scum, then, is it?

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Thu Dec 20, 2007 9:44 am

creampuffeater wrote:I REFUSE!

You make me sad. PLEEASE post something relevant?

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:34 am

Where the fuck is everyone?

YagamiLight · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 8:02 am

Well, I would still like to hear from Spambot but given the activity we've been at, I'm beginning to think we may just want to lynch him.

Phate · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:02 pm

[insert post here to avoid modkill]

Apologies for absence, posting should resume next year.

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Sat Dec 22, 2007 1:24 pm

Phate wrote:
Apologies for absence, posting should resume next year.

took me a second to realize you werent just being an asshole with that comment.

Primate · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:16 am

FYI, I have not forgotten about this game or anything.

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:43 pm

Primate wrote:FYI, I have not forgotten about this game or anything.

I dont believe you.

Elias_the_thief · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Wed Dec 26, 2007 7:08 pm

Ok guys. I think this game is starting to go downhill, but I know we have one replacement on the way, maybe another, and I think that Spambot isnt too bad a lynch for today. For one, I think he's the most likely scum. Second, he'll provide us some info. Third, we'll be getting rid of an inactive, giving Primate one less replacement to find. So I seriously think we should just end today with a spam lynch.

thedragonsprincess · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:04 pm

its obvious practicly no one is taking interest in this game anymore (I say practicly because I know there are a few who are) and it doesnt seem like the mod is either. why not just abandon the game?

YagamiLight · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 3:39 pm

I want to continue the game. I also want to hear from Shanba. Also, I think we should give everyone leeway until the end of the year just in case.

Primate · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:29 pm

thedragonsprincess wrote:its obvious practicly no one is taking interest in this game anymore (I say practicly because I know there are a few who are) and it doesnt seem like the mod is either. why not just abandon the game?

What gives you the impression that I'm not paying attention to the game anymore? And it'd be much easier to keep this game going if

certain

people didn't request replacement for being in too many games then immediately go sign up for a bunch more.

Kison replaces Spambot.

Also, I'm going to lift the jan 1st deadline until I can get a full player complement, so I'm not forced to have another long night.

thedragonsprincess · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:55 am

ok I said i was in one too many games meaning the limit of minis is four and I was in 5- DO NOT make me out to be the bad guy here. ... and if you really were paying attention to the game I would think you would be making more attempts to keep the game going.

Primate · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Fri Dec 28, 2007 3:21 am

thedragonsprincess wrote:ok I said i was in one too many games meaning the limit of minis is four and I was in 5- DO NOT make me out to be the bad guy here. ... and if you really were paying attention to the game I would think you would be making more attempts to keep the game going.

Oh, ok, you didn't specify. You can understand I would be annoyed if you left my game for being too busy then joining a bunch of others, though, sorry. And what do you expect me to do regarding keeping this game going? I am prodding people. I am replacing people not responding to prods. What else should I be doing?

EDIT: To keep you updated, btb, the only person who didn't respond to a prod is Vampyrusddg. Everyone else is present and aware of the thread.