In post 8, drealmerz7 wrote:I heard there is a cattle ban
but that doesn't mean there won't be any meat
no I hate claims on D1 like that - it's pure scum or severe anti-town either way you need to go
I like this, a few town points for drealmerz.
In post 47, Alisae wrote:Competative Trash Tier Overwatch team looking for Velma, Fred, and Daphne.
Canidates will automaticly get Townreads from both me and Transcend.
Apply now!
I'm not good enough to be a Velma, I'm definetely not Daphne... I guess I'm the driver then. Where's my ascot?
Oh man. I trust Mick 100% with this.
In post 62, Indigo wrote: In post 58, drealmerz7 wrote: In post 57, Alisae wrote:Also if there isn't a wagon on my ass this game that means people are too pussy to push my ass.
this is pure scummyness
shit like this HURTS THE GAME AND HURTS TOWN
totally votable
I cant believe it but i am agreeing with Dreal. If you shitpost for the next few pages then i assume you both are scum and are trying to make a lot of noise to disrupt the game. Please actually play the game. Make regular conversation, scum hunt later on, contribute to forward the town wincon or i will just assume you are scum.
Eh, save it for the vigilante (if we have one) if this keeps up. I think I saw the shitposting does keep up too. Ugh.
Shit Posting
Shit Posting
Shit Posting
More Shit Posting
In post 278, Jaack wrote:Actual real vote time.
VOTE: Ramcius
While it's not alone worth voting for, I've never really liked plays type disclaimers like the one in
122. They always read more like preemptive excuse making.
Moving along, I don't really like
266 or
270 either. They both have this wishy washy tone in that they aren't outright calling Alisae scum, but they are implying it in a way that would be easy to back out of. And while his vote is on Alisae it's essentially an RVS vote from waaay back, so, again, it's an almost kinda scumread that's easy to back out of.
In post 285, Jaack wrote: In post 279, Ramcius wrote:well, me and Alisae have still ongoing game together, so till it's not ended, i can't explain my actions, but why you think i can't have genuine feel on Alisae to be scum?
I never said your scumread couldn't be real. Even scum are going to have real scumreads in multiball.
My problem was that it looks like you were trying to avoid committing to scumreading Alisae. Your vote was there and you were questioning him but it looked like you were letting yourself out of the read. For example:
In post 270, Ramcius wrote:sure i can, but sheeping is scummy, or starting wagon like that without stating a reason, and next time it might be wagon on you after naked vote
This reads to me like you have a legitimate reason to scumread Alisae, but you're letting him off the hook.
Next time there might be a wagon? Why not push for it this time? You're vote may be there, but I don't get the feeling from your posts that your that interested in pressuring him.
I like both of these posts. Pretty good reasoning being so early in the game.
In post 299, Pepchoninga wrote: In post 285, Jaack wrote: In post 279, Ramcius wrote:well, me and Alisae have still ongoing game together, so till it's not ended, i can't explain my actions, but why you think i can't have genuine feel on Alisae to be scum?
I never said your scumread couldn't be real. Even scum are going to have real scumreads in multiball.
My problem was that it looks like you were trying to avoid committing to scumreading Alisae. Your vote was there and you were questioning him but it looked like you were letting yourself out of the read. For example:
In post 270, Ramcius wrote:sure i can, but sheeping is scummy, or starting wagon like that without stating a reason, and next time it might be wagon on you after naked vote
This reads to me like you have a legitimate reason to scumread Alisae, but you're letting him off the hook.
Next time there might be a wagon? Why not push for it this time? You're vote may be there, but I don't get the feeling from your posts that your that interested in pressuring him.
Why should he push for a wagon so early on? All we've got from many of us is just a load of shitposting. Committing to a lynch so fast could be an easu way for scum to manipulate a situation.
It's not committing, you can change at any time. But you're never going to get any information or reads D1 without some pushing. Run up a wagon, see who gets on, see who stays off, how people react, rinse repeat, get some sort of info.
In post 318, gerryoat wrote: In post 17, Transcend wrote:@MOD
if both scum teams kill the same person does the kill not go through like fire and ice or will they die
wait there is 2 maf teams?
I don't like these. Almost seems like a forced townslip. I didn't even sign up for this game in queue and I knew it was multiball.
So far, town leaning on Jaack, scum leaning on Yoshi and Indigo (mainly gut feelings), Penguin needs to post more, rest is fairly neutral.