You need a chill pill too.In post 1494, DiamondSentinel wrote:Meh. Whatever. I can see why the site's losing so many people. Jesus christ, you new members are toxic.
One overreaction doesn't need another.
You need a chill pill too.In post 1494, DiamondSentinel wrote:Meh. Whatever. I can see why the site's losing so many people. Jesus christ, you new members are toxic.
If I was scumreading you, I'd be voting you.In post 1495, DiamondSentinel wrote:Grey.
Tell me why the fuck you are scumreading me.
Is it because I said that you've got a pissy attitude? Because you do. You waltzed into this thread and gave out a toxicity only matched by KainTepes. You've done nothing to help the game. You led a wagon that ended up killing a town player, without there actually being a good reason for it.
Pressure him, and he might.In post 1507, massive wrote:Make him post and we might.
I'm sorry, but I don't like replacing into a game only for people to immediate discredit me and just not pay attention to what I am trying to say.In post 1503, Leonshade wrote:VOTE: DiamondSentinel
I don't like that reaction to Grey's finishers. Not the negativity, but specifically going straight to the personal "you're so toxic" accusation. DS's knee-jerk reaction being about Grey's personality, rather than questioning his alignment, sticks out to me.
Can you reread Grey outside the context here (with respect to DiamondSentinel) and tell me your thoughts? He's essentially trolling his way to victory if he's scum. How is using a pseudo-day-vig for no better reason than roleplaying anything but anti-town?In post 1496, Tywin Lannister wrote:Pot, meet kettle. So after reading everything, your only scum read was me, and from what I can gather, it was due to me 'naked voting' Gamma. You apparently didn't care about any posts I made previously when I scum read him, so your huge scum read that you want lynched is due to a vote, one that almost everyone else made as well.In post 1495, DiamondSentinel wrote:Grey.
Tell me why the fuck you are scumreading me.
Is it because I said that you've got a pissy attitude? Because you do. You waltzed into this thread and gave out a toxicity only matched by KainTepes. You've done nothing to help the game. You led a wagon that ended up killing a town player, without there actually being a good reason for it.
So... You're basically saying that you don't have any scum reads at all, and you want to lynch me without reason... Yet give -grey- shit for lynching someone 'without reason.' You also give him shit for his content, yet yours is just admitting that you have nothing to add. Everything you've said so far is about shading others due to voting Gamma, yet you're ignoring everyone else who voted him. Why? How do you have no real scum reads after freshly reading the game? If your clamering to get me lynched is due to voting Gamma, then saying 'I have no real SRs' would be more honest of you.
I like these posts from Leon. He's town IMO. Good draft pick afterall.In post 1505, Leonshade wrote:I don't like sheeping wagons, I like sorting people.
In post 1505, Leonshade wrote:I don't like sheeping wagons, I like sorting people.
Will do. I SR grey D1, but ignored it since Titus likes him. I'll ISO him after work. It's been a long week (60 something hours), so I've posted mainly during lunch breaks.In post 1511, ɀefiend wrote:Can you reread Grey outside the context here (with respect to DiamondSentinel) and tell me your thoughts? He's essentially trolling his way to victory if he's scum. How is using a pseudo-day-vig for no better reason than roleplaying anything but anti-town?In post 1496, Tywin Lannister wrote:Pot, meet kettle. So after reading everything, your only scum read was me, and from what I can gather, it was due to me 'naked voting' Gamma. You apparently didn't care about any posts I made previously when I scum read him, so your huge scum read that you want lynched is due to a vote, one that almost everyone else made as well.In post 1495, DiamondSentinel wrote:Grey.
Tell me why the fuck you are scumreading me.
Is it because I said that you've got a pissy attitude? Because you do. You waltzed into this thread and gave out a toxicity only matched by KainTepes. You've done nothing to help the game. You led a wagon that ended up killing a town player, without there actually being a good reason for it.
So... You're basically saying that you don't have any scum reads at all, and you want to lynch me without reason... Yet give -grey- shit for lynching someone 'without reason.' You also give him shit for his content, yet yours is just admitting that you have nothing to add. Everything you've said so far is about shading others due to voting Gamma, yet you're ignoring everyone else who voted him. Why? How do you have no real scum reads after freshly reading the game? If your clamering to get me lynched is due to voting Gamma, then saying 'I have no real SRs' would be more honest of you.
I have been wanting Grey since forever but apparently everyone is blind to scumtells in this game.
Relax dude.In post 1514, DiamondSentinel wrote:Hey, unless you want to end this day with no information but the fact that I'm town, I would suggest someone vote for Grey.
That'd be great.
Now if you were going to break it yourself, then why did you do it in the first place?In post 1515, -Grey- wrote:Relax dude.In post 1514, DiamondSentinel wrote:Hey, unless you want to end this day with no information but the fact that I'm town, I would suggest someone vote for Grey.
That'd be great.
VOTE: Grey
VOTE: Pepto
Refer to 1501.In post 1516, DiamondSentinel wrote:Now if you were going to break it yourself, then why did you do it in the first place?
And yet RAW nearly had one of those happen Day 1.In post 1517, -Grey- wrote:Refer to 1501.In post 1516, DiamondSentinel wrote:Now if you were going to break it yourself, then why did you do it in the first place?
The finishing moves are just toys, dude. There is no serious threat in a kill that takes 48 hours to go through and can be interrupted by a simple vote.
But did it?In post 1518, DiamondSentinel wrote:And yet RAW nearly had one of those happen Day 1.In post 1517, -Grey- wrote:Refer to 1501.In post 1516, DiamondSentinel wrote:Now if you were going to break it yourself, then why did you do it in the first place?
The finishing moves are just toys, dude. There is no serious threat in a kill that takes 48 hours to go through and can be interrupted by a simple vote.
Only because a lurker came out of the woodwork and hammered.In post 1519, -Grey- wrote:But did it?In post 1518, DiamondSentinel wrote:And yet RAW nearly had one of those happen Day 1.In post 1517, -Grey- wrote:Refer to 1501.In post 1516, DiamondSentinel wrote:Now if you were going to break it yourself, then why did you do it in the first place?
The finishing moves are just toys, dude. There is no serious threat in a kill that takes 48 hours to go through and can be interrupted by a simple vote.
No, the move was interrupted, andIn post 1520, DiamondSentinel wrote:Only because a lurker came out of the woodwork and hammered.In post 1519, -Grey- wrote:But did it?In post 1518, DiamondSentinel wrote:And yet RAW nearly had one of those happen Day 1.In post 1517, -Grey- wrote:Refer to 1501.In post 1516, DiamondSentinel wrote:Now if you were going to break it yourself, then why did you do it in the first place?
The finishing moves are just toys, dude. There is no serious threat in a kill that takes 48 hours to go through and can be interrupted by a simple vote.