Only a few days til deadline and I like this wagon better than shaddowez right now.
Can someone
Can someone
Show me one single town read from them.In post 647, CloudKicker wrote:Grey, i told you why i townread him, i dont want him lynched because i want shadow lynched, this is all pretty simple
You're implying that town would not play to their wincon.In post 655, CloudKicker wrote:Youre implying town will have a townread and town would try to advance the game
You can say the word towntelling until you're blue in the face, it doesn't make drealmz town because you have to be playing towards your wincon in order to towntell.In post 658, CloudKicker wrote:Implying outing a tr and trying to advance the game is the only way to play for your wincon. Just towntelling is playing for your wincon yknow, when town defends you when ppl try to strongarm the lynches on them
That's a criminally bad misrepresentation of my case against him.In post 660, CloudKicker wrote:Lol then we disagree, there isnt a shadow of insumountable evidence againts him, all your saiyng hes that hes scum for messing around which is a bullshit case bro
Shitty unexplained vote that's borderline rulebreaking.
The only reason he ever gives to vote Algebra, which came will after he actually voted for him.In post 294, drealmerz7 wrote: self vote is PL in my book
no other reason needed to vote
get on algebra pls (:
drealmerz has been playing the game to deny information to town this entire game and there is no legitimate excuse for their play.In post 664, CloudKicker wrote:Thats not what i call insurmountable evidence and its easier for scum to out trs than srs or to slapfight like you said ppl agreeing with you are mefia grey if youre not
I am well aware and I chose my words deliberately.In post 666, CloudKicker wrote:To deny information or not to produce content isnt the same, boy-o
If you're still blindly defending him, I do.In post 669, CloudKicker wrote:You still think im mefia with that dude, dont you
If he flips town, then my reads are obviously shit and I'll shut the fuck up and let somebody else drive.In post 671, CloudKicker wrote:And what if he flips town, will you say that i chainsawed him because my reason to tr him is not good enough compared to what he did ? therefore only mafia could know that he was town. Will you try to push that idea or not
Thats a bit rough. When im town and i have a strong read and the read flips, i tend to not only blame myself but also the other guy for scumtelling and such. I wouldnt call my reads outright ''obviously shit'' just because i missed. A pro-town answer would look like:In post 673, -Grey- wrote:In post 671, CloudKicker wrote:And what if he flips town, will you say that i chainsawed him because my reason to tr him is not good enough compared to what he did ? therefore only mafia could know that he was town. Will you try to push that idea or notIf he flips town, then my reads are obviously shit and I'll shut the fuck up and let somebody else drive.
As it stands, this wagon is the only one that is based on a case that goes beyond superficial reasoning.