Mini Normal 1854: Game Over

Aristophanes · Post Post #1075 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:40 am

Vedith wrote:I forgot I wasn't on Fritz.
VOTE: Fritz

In post 1055, Aristophanes wrote:
L-1 [/u]

TwoFace · Post Post #1076 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:40 am

In post 1071, Aristophanes wrote:We're not fucking lynching either of them today.

Vote someone we actually might be able to lynch for once!

not voting a claimed PR
Creeps and Gamma are town reads

who should I vote for exactly?

not going to sacrifice my principles if I don't absolutely have to.

TwoFace · Post Post #1077 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:41 am

In post 1074, Vedith wrote:I do.
It's bullshit and he's scum.

good for you.

it's not worth the gamble for me, if we are wrong we have made mafia's job easier.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1078 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:41 am

In post 1073, TwoFace wrote:
In post 1070, Vedith wrote:"I agree with this"
Changes vote.

In post 728, TwoFace wrote:You don't lynch a claimed pr day 1 ever

This game theory is flawed, as has been pointed out previously.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1079 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:43 am

In post 1076, TwoFace wrote:
In post 1071, Aristophanes wrote:We're not fucking lynching either of them today.

Vote someone we actually might be able to lynch for once!
not voting a claimed PR
Creeps and Gamma are town reads

who should I vote for exactly?

not going to sacrifice my principles if I don't absolutely have to.

Then I guess we'll have to wait until the final hour (Unless someone else picks this up and voted, in which case, glad your principles stay intact).

Vedith · Post Post #1080 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:43 am

Lynch Fritz TwoFace and I might not lynch you tomorrow.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1081 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:44 am

In post 1080, Vedith wrote:Lynch Fritz TwoFace and I might not lynch you tomorrow.

I love it when you try being assertive! Is cute!

TwoFace · Post Post #1082 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:45 am

In post 1078, Aristophanes wrote:This game theory is flawed, as has been pointed out previously.

it's not theory imo, it has been more correct than incorrect for me.

Vedith · Post Post #1083 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:45 am

TwoFace · Post Post #1084 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:46 am

In post 1080, Vedith wrote:Lynch Fritz TwoFace and I might not lynch you tomorrow.

that would mean i would have to care if i got lynched right? I don't so do what you gotta do homie

Vedith · Post Post #1085 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:47 am

I might take your avi...

havingfitz · Post Post #1086 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:48 am

Busy rl ... will respond by 1130

Aristophanes · Post Post #1087 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:49 am

In post 1082, TwoFace wrote:
In post 1078, Aristophanes wrote:This game theory is flawed, as has been pointed out previously.
it's not theory imo, it has been more correct than incorrect for me.

But basing a lynch off play us so much more important man!

Otherwise scum get to be scummy and then go "Not it! PR!" at the end of the phase consequence free! They can plan for this and use it to manipulate the late day scurry hitting whoever they set up. There are many potential downfalls to this.

Joshz · Post Post #1088 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:51 am

6 hours

TwoFace · Post Post #1089 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:53 am

In post 1087, Aristophanes wrote:Otherwise scum get to be scummy and then go "Not it! PR!"

they do that anyway

but sometimes people play like shit, especially when they are a PR. Just look at the masons this game. both have played like shit. people think since they are a PR they can't actually be helpful like they normally would because it would put too much attention on them. it's crap logic yet I see it all the time.

Vedith · Post Post #1090 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:54 am

Fritz isn't jailer though, TwoFace.

MathBlade · Post Post #1091 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:56 am

In post 1058, havingfitz wrote:Nacho...talk to me. Since you essentially kick started this wagon on me. How am I scum and how am I a better lynch than some of the other candidates?

Granted if town is going to have a mislynches it's better to get it out of the way D1 but I'd like to contribute through a few days at least. It's in your best interests.

Preview edit. Ffs.

I'm a jailkeeper

No way this is town.

VOTE: havingfitz

Very strong

reasons

that I disagree.

MathBlade · Post Post #1092 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:58 am

And if y'all see between the italics then you will see why that is.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1093 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 3:59 am

In post 1091, MathBlade wrote:
In post 1058, havingfitz wrote:Nacho...talk to me. Since you essentially kick started this wagon on me. How am I scum and how am I a better lynch than some of the other candidates?

Granted if town is going to have a mislynches it's better to get it out of the way D1 but I'd like to contribute through a few days at least. It's in your best interests.

Preview edit. Ffs.

I'm a jailkeeper
No way this is town.

VOTE: havingfitz

Very strong
reasons
that I disagree.

<3

Aristophanes · Post Post #1094 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:01 am

In post 1089, TwoFace wrote:
In post 1087, Aristophanes wrote:Otherwise scum get to be scummy and then go "Not it! PR!"
they do that anyway

but sometimes people play like shit, especially when they are a PR. Just look at the masons this game. both have played like shit. people think since they are a PR they can't actually be helpful like they normally would because it would put too much attention on them. it's crap logic yet I see it all the time.

But this means you give them a free pass to do so, anytime, all the time. That's the problem I have with it.

And if you say "oh well you played badly but I won't lynch you" then the issue of bad play as PRs will never end. You're actually feeding it unintentionally.

MathBlade · Post Post #1095 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:02 am

TeoFace or Gamma tomorrow.

MathBlade · Post Post #1096 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:04 am

In post 1094, Aristophanes wrote:
In post 1089, TwoFace wrote:
In post 1087, Aristophanes wrote:Otherwise scum get to be scummy and then go "Not it! PR!"
they do that anyway

but sometimes people play like shit, especially when they are a PR. Just look at the masons this game. both have played like shit. people think since they are a PR they can't actually be helpful like they normally would because it would put too much attention on them. it's crap logic yet I see it all the time.
But this means you give them a free pass to do so, anytime, all the time. That's the problem I have with it.

And if you say "oh well you played badly but I won't lynch you" then the issue of bad play as PRs will never end. You're actually feeding it unintentionally.

This is my argument from earlier and the same thing I used as scum in 1800. Fitz did not play like and very likely is not a town Jailkeeper.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1097 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:04 am

In post 1095, MathBlade wrote:TeoFace or Gamma tomorrow.

ToeFace*

Misspelling names is rude Math!

TwoFace · Post Post #1098 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:04 am

In post 1094, Aristophanes wrote:But this means you give them a free pass to do so, anytime, all the time. That's the problem I have with it.

And if you say "oh well you played badly but I won't lynch you" then the issue of bad play as PRs will never end. You're actually feeding it unintentionally.

ok whatever. You have your opinions on how to do things, I have mine.

Aristophanes · Post Post #1099 (ISO) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:06 am

In post 1098, TwoFace wrote:
In post 1094, Aristophanes wrote:But this means you give them a free pass to do so, anytime, all the time. That's the problem I have with it.

And if you say "oh well you played badly but I won't lynch you" then the issue of bad play as PRs will never end. You're actually feeding it unintentionally.
ok whatever. You have your opinions on how to do things, I have mine.

Indeed. I'm not gonna bang thus drum anymore (for now) as we aren't going to come to terms.