Current Vote Count:
With 14 votes available, it takes 8 votes to hammer.
Countdown: (expired on 2016-12-14 22:00:00)
It is a possibility however Nahdia not blocking who they think they should is the bigger indicator. Narna's guilty could be town derp. I asked for people's opinion to that question why do you then ask me for mine before giving yours.In post 6976, BigYoshiFan wrote:Mathblade, who you agree that Narna having a guilty on Shiro means there is a framer and/or redirector?
In post 6960, MathBlade wrote:In post 6953, Almost50 wrote:I obviously do. Sorry for the typo.No wait but Gio confirmed Narna that still means Gio is a liar.In post 6956, MathBlade wrote:If Maxous happens to be town then the game is almost solved because it makes Nahdia a liar which makes Narna scum for the fake innocent on Nahdia. Pretty much the way I see it either Gio's innocent or Narna's is a piece of shit.
Damn but lynching Gio we learn nothing.
God I want Almost 50 Not Chara and Yoshi all on platters one of Maxous and Nahdia and Probably gio.
Fucking calling it. Maxous Gio Almost 50 Not Chara and Yoshi is it.
Oh, yes we can.In post 6981, MathBlade wrote:Good night all may we lynch scums.
In post 6980, MathBlade wrote:Do not stop scumhunting questions ever if you are town. That is what Yoshi did. For the love of all that is town go back and answer the questions asked. Conflict or not I don't care we are having a useful weekend.
Seems a bit LAMIST to meIn post 6981, MathBlade wrote:Good night all may we lynch scums.
No, Nahdia. It's Math.. I promise.In post 6988, Nahdia wrote:jesus christ can we please lynch BYF
It's for good reason though, is it not? For you, I think it is your posts that make you scummy (intentionally being annoying, for one thing). The rest of them are on the chopping block for their Night Action discrepancies.In post 6989, Almost50 wrote:@Yoshi:
Well, you should (trust me). Math has casted doubt on me, you, Gio, Maxous, NC, & Nahdia so far. they even considered any of the other two new replacement slots for instance. They told me to sheep them, but somehow decided I was scum when I reposted my OLD reads, which tells me I hit a live nerve somewhere. I guess Creature (Math)+Cakez+Firebringer (Accounant) is true after all, and I'm starting with the mastermind of this current team formation. Math, then Accountant, then Cakez. Ank can have his hammer if he wants, cuz I'm not moving my vote today.
Not what I meant. What I meant was that I am a loud vocal player so if I ask others a question I want it answered. Asking me that question shuts down conversation.In post 6982, BigYoshiFan wrote:Geez, maybe I'll just shut up from now on.
So basically only me, MathBlade, and SirCakez. :/In post 6993, Almost50 wrote:OK then. If the game doesn't end after we lynch the 3 I proposed hen your head is rolling as their 4th.
Bottom Line: I'm NOT lynching Gio, Maxous, Narna, massive, PV, Ank, Andrius, NC or Nahdia.
I heavily dislike his over-aggressive and overconfident playstyle, however,I don't know. Something that was always in the back of my head was: Maybe MathBlade will come up with a bunch of these theories and appear helpful to the town but utterly confuse the town and slip under the radar with all of his towncred for his posts. Nothing I'm willing to fight for, just superstition.
Let's get over this one more time. So, I claim that someone is innocent. Then I vote for him. You said that this is a scummy move. You didn't say what I would gain from this move as scum.In post 6957, MathBlade wrote:The reason I lean Gio's the liar too is because he voted his innocent read. That should never happen.
So, since I am scum with Maxous, why would I admit that my result on him is shaky? I was believed as weak having cleared him, and since he has claimed roleblocker, I could confirm that the type of action I supposedly caught him doing is interferring (the corresponding action to his claim) and be done with it.1) The premise is bad. If you are scum the entire thing is poisonous and you are not required to have actually targeted your buddy or have told the truth about any of it. I think the claim is engineered to give Maxous a bit of legitimacy.
In post 6983, BigYoshiFan wrote:Anyone have some meta reads on Mathblade?
Pretty sure you mean that sarcastically but thank you for pleading guilty.In post 6984, Almost50 wrote:In post 6960, MathBlade wrote:In post 6953, Almost50 wrote:I obviously do. Sorry for the typo.No wait but Gio confirmed Narna that still means Gio is a liar.In post 6956, MathBlade wrote:If Maxous happens to be town then the game is almost solved because it makes Nahdia a liar which makes Narna scum for the fake innocent on Nahdia. Pretty much the way I see it either Gio's innocent or Narna's is a piece of shit.
Damn but lynching Gio we learn nothing.
God I want Almost 50 Not Chara and Yoshi all on platters one of Maxous and Nahdia and Probably gio.
Fucking calling it. Maxous Gio Almost 50 Not Chara and Yoshi is it.
OK.. I plead guilty, your honour. LYNCH ME! *Grrrrrrr*
Votes are not the only way to accountability. If I am wrong we are done. However both you and Yoshi attacking me after I post my theory lends credence that I am right.In post 6989, Almost50 wrote:@Yoshi:
Well, you should (trust me). Math has casted doubt on me, you, Gio, Maxous, NC, & Nahdia so far. they even considered any of the other two new replacement slots for instance. They told me to sheep them, but somehow decided I was scum when I reposted my OLD reads, which tells me I hit a live nerve somewhere. I guess Creature (Math)+Cakez+Firebringer (Accounant) is true after all, and I'm starting with the mastermind of this current team formation. Math, then Accountant, then Cakez. Ank can have his hammer if he wants, cuz I'm not moving my vote today.