Open 660 - White Flag (Game Over)
-
-
BTD6_maker Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2244
- Joined: April 7, 2016
-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
-
-
ssbm_Kyouko She/HerJack of All TradesShe/Her
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7454
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: Middle Tennessee
Still catching up but it looks to me like alban ignored the explanation aubrey gave. Eric slot was only a scum lean at the time for aubrey because of a few posts that could be attributed to playstyle. Since aubrey works from null reads towards an alignment it's not a stretch to see why he would unvote such an early game replace-outIn post 286, alban wrote:
I agree with this. I had forgotten about the positioning of your unvote.In post 276, Aubrey wrote:I also un-voted the MOMENT Eric requested a replacement, not after he was replaced and LQ displayed immense activity. So scratch this crap of me backtracking cause"I realized LQ is more active and persistent than Eric."
But that brings me to another q.
If you really thought Eric was scummy, you shouldn't have unvoted before clearing his successor. I am not saying you are scummy or townie for doing that, but you can't use that argument in your favour either.-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
I don't know how I feel about Toto. Please explain to me why it is so opportunistic? Like he said wouldn't it be more opportunistic regarding those who jumped on once the wagon began to build? In order...
--
Transcend: post 15 (total RVS)
Toto: Post 42 (Basically RVS it seems with like a hint of real questioning. Once he is pushed he says he wasn't fond of the suicidal play in post 125)
Lethargy: post 56 + 57 (continues adding onto the wagon saying he is deflecting and scum with Transcend. Latter part probably being RVS talk.)
Gamma: post 58 and post 61 (says obvious scum for the self vote. Eh. No, not necessarily.)
Dave: himself post 59 (I mean yea it's weird, but seems like playful town who doesn't care about being serious just yet. Seems a bit early for scum to freak out and think, "Oh shit gotta do something crazy to get these peeps off me.")
Ssbm: post 60 who is the final vote on the bandwagon who continued to add onto the wagon because he never addressed toto only to hop off immediately once he realizes the vote count, but was still interested in lynching/pushing the slot based on his comment in post 63.
--
So, why is Toto the most likely to be scum (should their be scum) on this wagon based on opportunism? I'd be interested in hearing Transcend chime in on this since he was the first person to argue this in post 97 + 101, but has now moved onto new votes.
--
phew. That outlines the whole Dave bandwagon pretty much.-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
-
-
Gamma Emerald AnySurvivorAny
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 69109
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
OK, so I would like to make another point on how I read people here. This post alone is blatant IIoA, however, given context of who this player is I do not think they are using it as a Scum tactic to look like they are trying to contribute without contributing. This does not mean, however, that they cannot be Scum here. I can see a world where this player would make this post in an attempt to look Town.In post 328, Aubrey wrote:I don't know how I feel about Toto. Please explain to me why it is so opportunistic? Like he said wouldn't it be more opportunistic regarding those who jumped on once the wagon began to build? In order...
--
Transcend: post 15 (total RVS)
Toto: Post 42 (Basically RVS it seems with like a hint of real questioning. Once he is pushed he says he wasn't fond of the suicidal play in post 125)
Lethargy: post 56 + 57 (continues adding onto the wagon saying he is deflecting and scum with Transcend. Latter part probably being RVS talk.)
Gamma: post 58 and post 61 (says obvious scum for the self vote. Eh. No, not necessarily.)
Dave: himself post 59 (I mean yea it's weird, but seems like playful town who doesn't care about being serious just yet. Seems a bit early for scum to freak out and think, "Oh shit gotta do something crazy to get these peeps off me.")
Ssbm: post 60 who is the final vote on the bandwagon who continued to add onto the wagon because he never addressed toto only to hop off immediately once he realizes the vote count, but was still interested in lynching/pushing the slot based on his comment in post 63.
--
So, why is Toto the most likely to be scum (should their be scum) on this wagon based on opportunism? I'd be interested in hearing Transcend chime in on this since he was the first person to argue this in post 97 + 101, but has now moved onto new votes.
--
phew. That outlines the whole Dave bandwagon pretty much.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
ssbm_Kyouko She/HerJack of All TradesShe/Her
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7454
- Joined: November 3, 2016
- Pronoun: She/Her
- Location: Middle Tennessee
-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I'm actually more interested in what Aubre thinks here.In post 332, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Bit yeah this game blew up while I was sleeping. I'm gonna eat breakfast and then go back and read again, just skimmed through from bed on my phone
Pedit: but aubrey does give analysis so how is that IIoA?I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
So the post was directed at me and yet you ask Transcend what his thoughts are on the matter?In post 333, Aubrey wrote:LQ, you do realize that post is directed at you. no? Did you not say that you were suspicious of Toto based on his opportunistic vote? Even though you are voting a slot that clearly isn't here right now and has only made one post so far.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
-
-
Gamma Emerald AnySurvivorAny
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 69109
- Joined: August 9, 2016
- Pronoun: Any
- Location: Hell on Earth (aka Texas)
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
I did not pick up on that, no.In post 338, Gamma Emerald wrote:LQ plz don't be clueless that clearly maens in additionI was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
Of course. You are copying his original read, so I'm curious as to what he thinks as well now that time has passed. I thought it was obvious that my original post was directed at you. My apologies for not being so blunt.
My post is a simple outline of the bandwagon that unfolded against Dave, and a question as to why you have picked Toto out of all the votes as being the most opportunistic. followed by interest in hearing Transcends thoughts on the matter since it was his original read on Toto that you are also following. It wouldn't hurt to also know why Transcend found it to be the most opportunistic as well. Take it for what you will. Obviously If i was scum I wouldn't admit "oh yea i wrote that shit up to look like I was trying to figure out the game and was a bunch of filler shit."-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
-
-
LicketyQuickety Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12785
- Joined: May 14, 2015
- Location: Where the moon and the sea meet.
A few things. The topic came up, I haven't emphatically said I think it was the most opportunistic vote. I can't speak for Transcends thoughts on it. If you were wise, it would be very smart to admit that you made an IIoA post.In post 341, Aubrey wrote:Of course. You are copying his original read, so I'm curious as to what he thinks as well now that time has passed. I thought it was obvious that my original post was directed at you. My apologies for not being so blunt.
My post is a simple outline of the bandwagon that unfolded against Dave, and a question as to why you have picked Toto out of all the votes as being the most opportunistic. followed by interest in hearing Transcends thoughts on the matter since it was his original read on Toto that you are also following. It wouldn't hurt to also know why Transcend found it to be the most opportunistic as well. Take it for what you will. Obviously If i was scum I wouldn't admit "oh yea i wrote that shit up to look like I was trying to figure out the game and was a bunch of filler shit."
The reason I thought the vote was opportunistic is because there was such little basis for the vote all the while trying to make more of a reason out of it than there was. It also "felt" a lot stronger than an RVS vote. In other words, there was intent behind the vote that was unjustified.I was anything worse than you! Anything worse than you was I!
You was doided teh aposit_tisopa het dedoid saw em.-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
I dont fully understand what difference it makes what I categorize my post as being. I didn't understand this opportunistic argument you were making (nor did I really understand Transcends original statement, but sadly I think he is full of it sometimes so I ignored it) and I mostly did it for myself and others who may want to reference back to the bandwagon. More importantly, I did it so we all would have an illustration of what occurred for when you and Transcend answered why you thought he was the most opportunistic out of the lot. Which btw, you never did.
Further more, you never addressed why you are not voting him (since you have expressed doubt) but instead are voting an empty slot who has only made one post and clearly isnt here. Your vote, based not the reason you gave, would be better suited if he had made a second post later down the line that held little substance in correlation to his lurativity.
Can we make that a new word here? Lurkativity. Has a nice ring to it.-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
-
-
Transcend Survivor
-
-
Aubrey Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2740
- Joined: May 17, 2016
- Location: Southern USA
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.