Mini #509: Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers, Game Over!

Mirth · Post Post #625 (ISO) » Fri Nov 30, 2007 1:04 pm

Yes, I agree that I don't like Originality's play so far, but I'm very hesitant to decide who bothers me most at the moment. Its between Originality's parroting (well, he's been showing an opinion of his own lately) and eagerness to lynch, Unright's half-claim, and CES's lack of explanation for his opinions. And I really can't get any closer to deciding what with no one else saying anything. So...

Mod: Can we get a mass prod? Pretty please with sugar on top? Thank you

jmar · Post Post #626 (ISO) » Fri Nov 30, 2007 1:21 pm

I'm here. I also don't really know what to say. Perhaps I should reread (sigh...)

dybeck · Post Post #627 (ISO) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 2:35 am

jmar wrote:
dybeck wrote:a topic that will divide the town down the middle.
I agree we need something to discuss, but this part confuses me... why do we want the town divided?

We need to see people's colors so that we have some info for tomorrow.

What we need is a decent-sized bandwagon.

Mirth · Post Post #628 (ISO) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:51 am

Or, alternatively, we could actually do that whole discussing thing today. Dybeck, do you feel like finally responding to my question about whether or not you think Unright shoud claim?

petroleumjelly · Post Post #629 (ISO) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:25 pm

Bookitty replaces killerbob. Please specify who you would like to be prodded!

Official Day Two Vote Count: #2

originality – 2 – Cogito Ergo Scum, Flameaxe
Unright – 2 – dybeck, jmar

dybeck – 1 – originality

With

10

alive, it takes

6

to lynch!

Not Voting – 5 – Bookitty, Joubert, Mirth, PlaysWithSquirrels, Unright

Mirth · Post Post #630 (ISO) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:44 pm

Woot ^_^ One less non-player. I hope...

Flameaxe · Post Post #631 (ISO) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 6:47 pm

Bookitty - Vote for originality, because it is a win/win situation. If you are town, you move one step closer to winning. If you are scum you get to perform some awesome bussing.

How can you go wrong with that?

dybeck · Post Post #632 (ISO) » Sat Dec 01, 2007 11:18 pm

Mirth wrote:Or, alternatively, we could actually do that whole discussing thing today. Dybeck, do you feel like finally responding to my question about whether or not you think Unright shoud claim?

I think I answered this. If not, my answer is that we should bandwagon him and see what happens. Whether or not he chooses to claim, and the nature of his claim, are the info we require.

Mirth · Post Post #633 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 4:01 am

Mod:I seem to have overlooked your question about prods. Please prod the following people, since its been at least 5 days since last post: Unright, CES, Originalisty, Joubert, and PWS, if he is still here. Thanks

Flameaxe · Post Post #634 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 8:18 am

PWS is being replaced.

petroleumjelly · Post Post #635 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:22 am

DrippingGoofball replaces PlaysWithSquirrels, effective immediately. Thanks! Let's get this show back on the road!

Unright, Cogito Ergo Scum, originality, and Joubert have all been prodded.

Flameaxe · Post Post #636 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:29 am

STOP FOLLOWING ME DGB! Anyway, vote for originality for the reasons I gave Bookitty.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #637 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:30 am

No, Flameaxe. The guy that got nightkilled didn't like jmar. Jmar was in the middle of the Peers wagon.

unvote, vote: jmar

But I will look at originality. Hold on.

Flameaxe · Post Post #638 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:33 am

Originality is so much scummier! It's fairly obvious.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #639 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 9:42 am

Flameaxe wrote:Originality is so much scummier! It's fairly obvious.

Convince me, cupcake.

Mirth · Post Post #640 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:16 am

question: DG, hae you read the whole thread thoroughly before voting?

Flameaxe · Post Post #641 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:17 am

No, just fucking read the posts. I'm sorry I have to go after your scumbuddy like this, but that's just how the game is played.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #642 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:29 am

originality feels town except for the speculation about the NK. Looks like he might be scum that's disappointed no one picked up the rationale of his nightkill, so he has to point it out to us to send us spinning.

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #643 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:34 am

Another thing thing I noticed is that CES seemed to be setting himself to look good knowing there would be a mislynch. =scummy.

jmar · Post Post #644 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:44 am

UltimaAvalon didn't like me? I never got that impression. He wasn't voting for me...

DrippingGoofball · Post Post #645 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:51 am

He didn't vote for you, but he made a few comments.

I was in the mood for doing something rash before reading the game

Flameaxe · Post Post #646 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:06 am

Then why is your vote still on him?

Mirth · Post Post #647 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:31 am

So you didn't read the whole game then?

Well, when you get a chance to, could I please get your opinion on Originality's lack of originality in most of his comments? Also on Unright's semi-claim. And I agree with you about CES. I'm not liking his explanations of "because I think so."

Bookitty · Post Post #648 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 11:47 am

I'm not going to vote til I'm done with my reread (bucking the trend here, I know) but so far I have seen some things from Originality that at least somewhat support Flameaxe's suspicion, for what it's worth.

dybeck · Post Post #649 (ISO) » Sun Dec 02, 2007 1:05 pm

I really find it hard to get excited about the originality wagon.

And I OWE him a lynching (j/k, orig)

Can someone please summarise the case for his lynch VERY succinctly for me?