Mini Normal 1839 - Game Over!


User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1725 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:32 pm

Post by bji »

In post 1723, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1712, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1704, Nero Cain wrote:Why do you think Karnos couldn't have known Mal was town?
The full question was:
In post 1704, Nero Cain wrote: Why do you think Karnos couldn't have known Mal was town, thus making him scum?
And I do not understand the question. Please ask it again, more clearly.
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1726 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:36 pm

Post by bji »

In post 796, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 794, ironstove wrote: Fire, I believe it's time to claim your role.
stop role fishing
What is the difference between today's calls for iron to fully claim versus iron's post back on day 1 that you had a problem with here, such that you are not saying "stop role fishing" to anyone now?
User avatar
Foxbird
Foxbird
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Foxbird
Goon
Goon
Posts: 555
Joined: May 21, 2016
Location: Germany

Post Post #1727 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:41 pm

Post by Foxbird »

Votecount 4.12


karnos
(2) - Nero Cain, PenguinPower
PenguinPower
(2) - Saru, Lowell
Nero Cain
(1) - ironstove

Not Voting
(3) - bji, MathBlade, karnos

With
8
players eligible to vote, it’s
5
to lynch!

Day 4 will end in
(expired on 2016-11-30 07:11:29).

Mod Notes:

None!
Last edited by Foxbird on Thu Nov 17, 2016 11:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1728 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:43 pm

Post by Nero Cain »

There was no reason for Fire to claim. Why do you think he should have claimed?

There's a bit of a difference in Fire getting ran up and claiming a PR and Iron claiming unprompted for what reason I don't know. Don'tcha think?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1729 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:45 pm

Post by bji »

In post 1721, Nero Cain wrote: I probably have lynched town for this, does it matter? The point is there's possible scum motivation in ignoring a certain game. So explain to me what the town motivation is?
Um, you
definitely
have lynched town for this,
in this game
and yes, it does matter. Part of your defense of having started that wagon is to refer to external games where, if one read them presumably, one would see that in that game a player who flipped scum and had engaged in V/LA shenanigans. But that defense only makes sense if it can be used to demonstrate that you could reasonably believed that it was
more likely
that a player who engages in V/LA shenanigans is scum than town. And since your history with players engaging in V/LA shenanigans cannot be reliably identified, this defense cannot be expected to hold any weight with anyone.

My "town motivation" for not trusting your cherrypicked "evidence" blindly is that I want to use good sound reasoning in my scumhunting.
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1730 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:47 pm

Post by bji »

In post 1728, Nero Cain wrote:There was no reason for Fire to claim. Why do you think he should have claimed?
I didn't say I thought he should have claimed. I am asking why YOU have a difference of opinion about these two situations with regards to whether or not people *should* or *should not* engage in role fishing.
There's a bit of a difference in Fire getting ran up and claiming a PR and Iron claiming unprompted for what reason I don't know. Don'tcha think?
Yes, I do think. But I asked you because I want to know what
you
think, not because I want an opportunity to say what I think.
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1731 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:47 pm

Post by Nero Cain »

How do you know its cherry picked if you haven't and aren't going to read my previous games?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1732 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:51 pm

Post by Nero Cain »

but I just told you, they are different situations and shouldn't be treated the same. Like there was F all reason for Fire to claim what PR he was. I am ok with Iron full claiming b/c I don't necessarily see the point in claiming unprompted like he did and we can see if his claim lines up with normal guidelines.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1733 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:52 pm

Post by bji »

In post 1731, Nero Cain wrote:How do you know its cherry picked if you haven't and aren't going to read my previous games?
I don't know that it is cherry picked, but I can never know that it's not, unless I read every game you ever played (which I am not going to do, for obvious reasons), and also have some confidence that you never played under another name on this site or on another site (which I can never have).

The point is, it's unreliable "evidence", and a defense that requires me to accept unreliable evidence is not a sound defense.
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1734 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:53 pm

Post by bji »

In post 1732, Nero Cain wrote:but I just told you, they are different situations and shouldn't be treated the same. Like there was F all reason for Fire to claim what PR he was. I am ok with Iron full claiming b/c I don't necessarily see the point in claiming unprompted like he did and we can see if his claim lines up with normal guidelines.
I agree with this thinking, and I feel the same way.
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1735 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 9:55 pm

Post by Nero Cain »

In post 1729, bji wrote:
In post 1721, Nero Cain wrote: I probably have lynched town for this, does it matter? The point is there's possible scum motivation in ignoring a certain game. So explain to me what the town motivation is?
Um, you
definitely
have lynched town for this,
in this game
and yes, it does matter. Part of your defense of having started that wagon is to refer to external games where, if one read them presumably, one would see that in that game a player who flipped scum and had engaged in V/LA shenanigans. But that defense only makes sense if it can be used to demonstrate that you could reasonably believed that it was
more likely
that a player who engages in V/LA shenanigans is scum than town. And since your history with players engaging in V/LA shenanigans cannot be reliably identified, this defense cannot be expected to hold any weight with anyone.

My "town motivation" for not trusting your cherrypicked "evidence" blindly is that I want to use good sound reasoning in my scumhunting.
And why can't my beliefs carry over?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1736 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:00 pm

Post by bji »

In post 1735, Nero Cain wrote: And why can't my beliefs carry over?
They can. But I can't know whether or not they did, so you'll have to come up with a better reason for why you voted for Mal, and if you can't, just accept that skepticism about your reasoning is rational.
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1737 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:15 pm

Post by Nero Cain »

In post 1724, bji wrote:Second, even if I think that PP is scum, I am not going to just latch onto any supporting reason no matter how ridiculous it is. I am not trying to lynch scum for bad reasons, I am trying to lynch them for good reasons, and if a reason isn't good, I'm not going to agree with it, even if it supports my scum read.
If you think a slot is scum then everything they are doing in the game is done with a scum mindset. Its not impossible to do "pro-town" things as scum but I think its kinda cognitive dissonance to assume PP is scum that jumped on the Thor wagon and also think that scum wouldn't do it.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1738 (ISO) » Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:18 pm

Post by Nero Cain »

In your last town game you were reading players as scummy for lurking, including BBT, who was scum. Can you explain to me how my belief that Mal was lurker scum is not a town mindset when you've gone after lurkers yourself as town?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
karnos
karnos
Mafia Scum
karnos
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2096
Joined: March 5, 2016

Post Post #1739 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 2:25 am

Post by karnos »

In post 1712, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1704, Nero Cain wrote:Why do you think Karnos couldn't have known Mal was town?
This is such a "water is wet" statement I can't believe you are pushing it.

That statement could literally be true of everyone in the game, except MathBlade the innocent child.

I think we got this wrapped up. Nero is defending himself and Penguin as expected, they are probably the last two scum. If Nero is town, I'm sorry he has been duped so badly but I think he is better than that.

VOTE: Nero Cain
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1740 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 2:49 am

Post by Nero Cain »

The only players that know everyone's alignment is mafia. Nice opportunistic vote hop.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
User avatar
PenguinPower
PenguinPower
He/Him
.peng
User avatar
User avatar
PenguinPower
He/Him
.peng
.peng
Posts: 24713
Joined: June 15, 2016
Pronoun: He/Him

Post Post #1741 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:05 am

Post by PenguinPower »

Here comes karnos setting up the two mislynches needed for a scum win! Great job, karnos!
User avatar
Nero Cain
Nero Cain
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Nero Cain
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 44933
Joined: December 6, 2009

Post Post #1742 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 3:25 am

Post by Nero Cain »

BJ, do you think "cherry picking" is scummy?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

edited c.s. lewis quote b/c limit
User avatar
MathBlade
MathBlade
He/Him
Technical Support
User avatar
User avatar
MathBlade
He/Him
Technical Support
Technical Support
Posts: 42761
Joined: September 9, 2013
Pronoun: He/Him
Location: Western US

Post Post #1743 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 5:55 am

Post by MathBlade »

Will work on my last will tonight but I want from everyone their list of reads in order of scumminess.
Exclude me and yourself.

Scummiest >> Towniest
karnos
karnos
Mafia Scum
karnos
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2096
Joined: March 5, 2016

Post Post #1744 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:09 am

Post by karnos »

In post 1741, PenguinPower wrote:Here comes karnos setting up the two mislynches needed for a scum win! Great job, karnos!
How on earth would I be setting up 2 miss-lynches? If we lynch you and you come back town, do you think anyone is going to be listening to me tomorrow?
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1745 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:11 am

Post by bji »

In post 1738, Nero Cain wrote:In your last town game you were reading players as scummy for lurking, including BBT, who was scum. Can you explain to me how my belief that Mal was lurker scum is not a town mindset when you've gone after lurkers yourself as town?
This is an OUTRIGHT LIE. Here is the closest I came to even considering lurking as scummy:

From http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p6792639

"OK so, scum killed at least one player from the lurky category. As I said before, this suggests to me that there was little/no benefit in killing players from the "actually playing the game" category, which implies that the scum were not in any particular danger after Day 1. The scum kill of either Slandaar or evilpacman18 suggests to me that scum liked the Day 1 fighting between BBT/RC/me/Scripten. Of all the players in that group, there are two who have mostly escaped scum reads during Day 1: BBT and me. I'm not scum, so the only interesting person in the category of "players who played hard day 1 but didn't get many scum reads" is BBT.

Therefore, I categorize my likely scum as BBT, and one or more of the lurkers."

I was scum reading the lurkers for REASONS,
NOT BECAUSE THEY WERE LURKERS
.

AND, BBT WAS NOT EVEN IN THAT CATEGORY!

Furthermore, your vote on Mal had the unique characteristic of choosing the player with the least interaction with anyone, making it the optimal scum mislynch. You are conveniently ignoring that part of the argument, every time your defense of the wagon you started on Mal is brought up.

Furthermore to my furthermore, you didn't argue against Mal because he was lurking, it was because his V/LA status happened to coincide with day end.

You lie too much to be town.

VOTE: Nero Cain
karnos
karnos
Mafia Scum
karnos
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2096
Joined: March 5, 2016

Post Post #1746 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:14 am

Post by karnos »

Town

MathBlade

ironstove
bji

Saru
Lowell

Nero Cain

PenguinPower


Scum
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1747 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:29 am

Post by bji »

In post 1743, MathBlade wrote:Will work on my last will tonight but I want from everyone their list of reads in order of scumminess.
Exclude me and yourself.

Scummiest >> Towniest
The formatting of karnos' list is gorgeous, I'm going to steal his technique:

Town

ironstove

karnos

Saru

Lowell

Penguin Power

Nero Cain


Scum
User avatar
bji
bji
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
bji
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 1597
Joined: December 23, 2014

Post Post #1748 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:34 am

Post by bji »

In post 1745, bji wrote: Furthermore to my furthermore, you didn't argue against Mal because he was lurking, it was because his V/LA status happened to coincide with day end.
I need to clarify this because I think I made a mistake. I misremembered Nero's reasons for his vote, indeed he never mentioned V/LA coinciding with day end, that was I think LMKGuy who made that argument.
User avatar
Foxbird
Foxbird
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Foxbird
Goon
Goon
Posts: 555
Joined: May 21, 2016
Location: Germany

Post Post #1749 (ISO) » Fri Nov 18, 2016 6:35 am

Post by Foxbird »

Boop.

Return to “Completed Mini Normal Games”