In post 981, Creature wrote:I agree with most of Hoopla's list, I'd say my scumpool is {Victor, Jaack, IAI, Sotty, goodmorning}
Actually I'm not sure if I would consider myself consistent.In post 1186, Creature wrote:Raskolnikov
goodmorning
Hoopla
Jaack
Creature
BlackVoid
VictorDeAngelo
CloudKicker
I Am Innocent
Sotty7
MariaR
lol this wagonIn post 1503, mhsmith0 wrote:Jaack (4)Raskolnikov , MariaR , CloudKicker , Hoopla L-2 ,
It's not flawed logic. You say youwanted a claim from sotty. With her at L-2 at the time, why didn't you vote her?In post 1565, CloudKicker wrote:Youre not wrong in that i did appeal to you, you still didnt come around and now i want you to claim, saying iam the one who staled the sotty's wagon by not putter her on L-1 when YOU unvoted is being hypocrite and flawed logic boi
In post 1573, Creature wrote:Oh nice, now we'll talk about why not frequently changing reads is a scum tell.
mmkIn post 1572, goodmorning wrote:Consistency is a trap a lot of newbScum fall into because we've been wired to think of consistency as good;in actuality, Town have reads progressions, growing and changing with new materials and assessments.
You can go through mild inconsistency and come out the other side - we call that fencesitting. That's nearly as scummy as consistency, though Town do it much more often.
It was L-1, you unvoted, i just didnt vote her to reput her at L-1 and she claimed anyway so idk whats your problemIn post 1578, Jaack wrote:It's not flawed logic. You say youwanted a claim from sotty. With her at L-2 at the time, why didn't you vote her?In post 1565, CloudKicker wrote:Youre not wrong in that i did appeal to you, you still didnt come around and now i want you to claim, saying iam the one who staled the sotty's wagon by not putter her on L-1 when YOU unvoted is being hypocrite and flawed logic boi
Also, explain my scum motivation for inviting sotty, since you claim my inconsistency is why you are voting me.
The problem is that you should have voted if you wanted her to claim. You had ample opportunity between my unvote and her claim and you had no reason to expect her to claim at L-2.In post 1580, CloudKicker wrote: It was L-1, you unvoted, i just didnt vote her to reput her at L-1 and she claimed anyway so idk whats your problem
In post 1584, Creature wrote:Oh right, I wanted to pretend you were town and see the results, but then I ended forgetting about that.
What's your Hoopla case? The only thing I can see from this day is post 1133. I was under the impression you were scum reading me and her as a team, or am I wrong with that?In post 1511, I Am Innocent wrote:I care more about lynching scum, hence the hoopla vote!In post 1504, MariaR wrote:Join the jaack vote for a townblock!
Where's the scum slip?In post 1563, Creature wrote:Does Hoopla usually scumslip and then lurks as town?
In post 692, Hoopla wrote:Grey, you should start scumreading yourself and Jack. I think it might change BlackVoid's mind.
Explain it to me like I am five, what am I missing here?In post 1587, Creature wrote:In post 692, Hoopla wrote:Grey, you should start scumreading yourself and Jack. I think it might change BlackVoid's mind.
