Open 54 - Basic 12 Player (over) before 529

[Ether]

3 wank (Andycyca, Elmo, IH)
2 Andycyca (Patrick, JDodge)
2 JDodge (Sikario8, Ripley)
1 Elmo (Crub)
1 Patrick (Shanba)
1 Ripley (appleof88)

2 Unvote (Glork, wank)

12 alive; 7 to lynch.

[Ether]

Apple takes another sip of orange juice. He has had a lot of orange juice; the prison caterers sent it in cups with his name on it. It is difficult to speak when one is using one's mouth for other purposes, such as drinking orange juice. Suddenly, he splutters and keels over.

"My bad!" Ether calls over. "Did you guys hear about that fraudulent mass-murdering software pirate who was so clever, incorrigible and Welsh that we ran out of puzzles for him? Jonny Appleseed? I guess we mixed up their mealplans or something.

"Well, I'd hate to disrupt your game..."

Jonny Appleseed

replaces

appleof88

, effective immediately.

[Glork]

Vote: JDodge

[Jonny Appleseed]

Mwahahahahahahahahaha.

I'll post properly when I've finished reading though this game.

[Elmo]

Unvote

:

wank

;

vote

:

JDodge

.

[JDodge]

Unvote

:

wank

;

vote

:

JDodge

.

Why am I not surprised?

Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?

[JDodge]

EBWOP:

Unvote, vote: Elmo

[Elmo]

^ failure

[JDodge]

^ failure

Nice rebuttal.

[Glork]

Unvote

:

wank

;

vote

:

JDodge

.

Why am I not surprised?

Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?

No, but I'm still pretty okay with his play.

I'd like you to address the inconsistency pointed out in Elmo's post. Why exactly are you voting Andy and why did you say two entirely different things in different posts?

[JDodge]

Unvote

:

wank

;

vote

:

JDodge

.

Why am I not surprised?

Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?

No, but I'm still pretty okay with his play.

I'd like you to address the inconsistency pointed out in Elmo's post. Why exactly are you voting Andy and why did you say two entirely different things in different posts?

Why can't the two reasons co-exist? I will admit that I withheld my main reason at first; but nothing more.

[Elmo]

I smell blood.

[JDodge]

I smell blood.

no you're just eager to get your NK in

[Glork]

Unvote

:

wank

;

vote

:

JDodge

.

Why am I not surprised?

Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?

No, but I'm still pretty okay with his play.

I'd like you to address the inconsistency pointed out in Elmo's post. Why exactly are you voting Andy and why did you say two entirely different things in different posts?

Why can't the two reasons co-exist? I will admit that I withheld my main reason at first; but nothing more.

Why on earth would you withhold your main reason?

[JDodge]

Unvote

:

wank

;

vote

:

JDodge

.

Why am I not surprised?

Furthermore, has anyone else noticed that Elmo has been on the largest bandwagon ever since the deadline was put into effect?

No, but I'm still pretty okay with his play.

I'd like you to address the inconsistency pointed out in Elmo's post. Why exactly are you voting Andy and why did you say two entirely different things in different posts?

Why can't the two reasons co-exist? I will admit that I withheld my main reason at first; but nothing more.

Why on earth would you withhold your main reason?

When do I ever give all my reasons?

[Glork]

Under deadline, one would think that you'd at least give your primary reason rather than some secondary reason. In spite of your tendency not to volunteer your thoughts, I find it odd that you'd say you're voting him "based on that post" rather than because of his vote if indeed you primarily suspect him for the latter.


Actually, if the post is what prompted you to move, I'd expect you to just state "based on his earlier vote and his most recent post" which you didn't do either. And unless I missed something in the past page, you still haven't indicated why his post is A) self-preservation; or B) why that, if true, would make him more likely to be scum.

[Jonny Appleseed]

vote IH

I've played with IH in a few games before on a different board. He's seemed uncharacteristically quiet compared to his usual townie self. This is something that Ripley has noticed as well.

Do you have anything to say in reply IH?

[Glork]

EBWOP: That should read "Anyway, if the vote is what prompted you to move but you already suspected him for the Patrickvote..."

Having a primary reason to suspect and a secondary "this pushes me over the edge" generally mandates that you state both reasons to explain your vote.

[Glork]

vote IH

I've played with IH in a few games before on a different board. He's seemed uncharacteristically quiet compared to his usual townie self. This is something that Ripley has noticed as well.

Do you have anything to say in reply IH?

Please give your first impressions of the following players:
Sikario
JDodge
Crub
Wank
Patrick

[Elmo]

Jonny: IH has been sick recently. I believe that explains the quiet, personally.

[JDodge]

Under deadline, one would think that you'd at least give your primary reason rather than some secondary reason. In spite of your tendency not to volunteer your thoughts, I find it odd that you'd say you're voting him "based on that post" rather than because of his vote if indeed you primarily suspect him for the latter.

Actually, if the post is what prompted you to move, I'd expect you to just state "based on his earlier vote and his most recent post" which you didn't do either. And unless I missed something in the past page, you still haven't indicated why his post is A) self-preservation; or B) why that, if true, would make him more likely to be scum.

I just tried to remember why his post felt self-preservative and managed to successfully defeat my own logic.

weeeeeeee

But are you saying that it's not more beneficial for scum to be self-preservative than for town?

[Glork]

But are you saying that it's not more beneficial for scum to be self-preservative than for town?

In this case, not really. Do you think that defending oneself is more beneficial for scum than for town?

[JDodge]

But are you saying that it's not more beneficial for scum to be self-preservative than for town?

In this case, not really. Do you think that defending oneself is more beneficial for scum than for town?

I think that staying alive matters less to town than to others, yes.

[Glork]

Supposing Andy is one of our power roles, do you still think it'd be more beneficial to try his hardest not to survive?

[JDodge]

Supposing Andy is one of our power roles, do you still think it'd be more beneficial to try his hardest not to survive?

Possibly; I would still argue that it is even

more

beneficial as scum.

But since I've established that my reasoning for thinking Andy was self-preservative is crap, why are we even discussing this?