In post 1275, BlackVoid wrote:Yeah, I wasn't a fan of that Hoopla post either although I felt Sotty7's D1 play had almost no town motivation. I'm considering whether TwoFace was killed because he had Sotty7/Hoopla pegged as a team as opposed to me who argued that they weren't partnered.
Pretend for 5 seconds that this is a 13p game and thus likely to have a 3p scumteam.
Then pretend that Scum aren't particularly one-dimensional in their NKs.
With that, you'll find yourself in a world more closely approximating the real one.
In post 1276, BlackVoid wrote:Wait, I seem to have glossed over this but the last thing you said about me was that I could be scum and then you have me in your top town list?
I'm assuming you think Rask's case is town and misguided? Still wondering what your response would be. He's not wrong that you didn't do much around deadline to push Victor over GreyICE.
Need to think this over. This game is hard.
Yup.
How many more times do I have to waste my breath saying it would have been a waste of breath?
Yup.
Yup.
I don't see why it surprises you.
@Hoopla RE: spec: There are probably 3 Scum, not 2, so who's to say what Scum might/might not be willing to do? Also, 3 Town PR +2 Mason wouldn't be outside the realm of possibility in most folks' opinions.
I, too, am a data collector. I'm not going after Victor today, as you may have noticed.
But all this theory is hiding the fact that you're not actually doing anything!
--
oh look, a semantic argument
hoopla, you realize that if what you're implying about creature is true, i'm much more likely to be town? i don't know that that's something you ought to have picked up on given that you're voting me.
p-edit: we have a game or 2; yes, as i recall.