The real folk blues [Canceled]

DiamondSentinel · Post Post #3950 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:44 am

Please... PLEASE CAN WE JUST LYNCH KTS. THIS IS SO BLATANTLY SCUM

Killthestory · Post Post #3951 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:45 am

since im not allowed to call u dumb, ur argument is dumb yes

Nosferatu · Post Post #3952 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:46 am

In post 3919, MathBlade wrote:Course there is a problem scum won't bus and not enough people will take their mislynch options.

Vote Kraska.

why the fuck do you keep pushing that shitty wagon that you continue to perform logical gymnastics to justify?

Expedience wrote:Nosferatu's ISO is pretty scummy. Stop making wagon speed arguments guys, they'll never be valid.

how is my iso scummy?

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #3953 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:47 am

DS, are you familiar with kts?

Expedience, I'd lynch you too. Should I fight you?

Expedience · Post Post #3954 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:53 am

There's a difference between town who don't give a fuck and scum who are trying to look like town who don't give a fuck. The latter wave it in everyone's faces (e.g. 2774) and blatantly try to hide behind it (e.g. 3809). The fact that Nosferatu does this openly just makes it easier to see because he thinks wifom will protect him

Expedience · Post Post #3955 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:55 am

In post 3953, Cerberus v666 wrote:Expedience, I'd lynch you too. Should I fight you?

no, it's ok.

Cerberus v666 · Post Post #3956 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 10:58 am

In post 3955, Expedience wrote:
In post 3953, Cerberus v666 wrote:Expedience, I'd lynch you too. Should I fight you?
no, it's ok.

Why?

Expedience · Post Post #3957 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:03 am

uhhhhhhhh, you seem like a kind person and if we did fight you'd probably beat me into a pulp

Killthestory · Post Post #3958 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:04 am

r u implying something

DiamondSentinel · Post Post #3959 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:05 am

In post 3953, Cerberus v666 wrote:DS, are you familiar with kts?

Expedience, I'd lynch you too. Should I fight you?

Thankfully, no.

Killthestory · Post Post #3960 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:07 am

In post 3958, Killthestory wrote:r u implying something

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #3961 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:10 am

In post 3948, Killthestory wrote:VOTE: expedience

lets go

You're scummy. Voting Expedience now accomplishes nothing. Even if I agree he's scummy, it does nothing.

Killthestory · Post Post #3962 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:10 am

yes it does just powerwagon it

d u h

MathBlade · Post Post #3963 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:11 am

In post 3952, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 3919, MathBlade wrote:Course there is a problem scum won't bus and not enough people will take their mislynch options.

Vote Kraska.
why the fuck do you keep pushing that shitty wagon that you continue to perform logical gymnastics to justify?

Expedience wrote:Nosferatu's ISO is pretty scummy. Stop making wagon speed arguments guys, they'll never be valid.
how is my iso scummy?

Why do you push something so straight forward as logical gymnastics?

MathBlade · Post Post #3964 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:16 am

Both you and Rach Marie asked me why when it is painfully obvious why and that Kraska made up shit not to be lynched.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #3965 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:16 am

In post 3962, Killthestory wrote:yes it does just powerwagon it

d u h

For what. To make him claim VT again?

Killthestory · Post Post #3966 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:16 am

In post 3965, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
In post 3962, Killthestory wrote:yes it does just powerwagon it

d u h
For what. To make him claim VT again?

to lynch it. vt is such a boring claim. y e s

y e s

whered u rather i vote hmm

Expedience · Post Post #3967 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:17 am

I'm not actually VT (and I thought I made that pretty clear), but I'd rather not have to claim.

MathBlade · Post Post #3968 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:17 am

In post 384, Expedience wrote:
In post 380, Killthestory wrote:yeah you claimed a bullshit role with absolutely no flavor and just 'VT'
It wasn't a serious claim btw, it was an inside joke with nc from that time

Expedience hasn't claimed jack

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #3969 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:17 am

Somewhere useful.

Killthestory · Post Post #3970 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:18 am

In post 3969, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Somewhere useful.

subjective

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #3971 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:18 am

In post 3967, Expedience wrote:I'm not actually VT (and I thought I made that pretty clear), but I'd rather not have to claim.

Yeah. Very clear. For the vig tonight.

Nero Cain · Post Post #3972 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:21 am

Math, even if Kraska is scum there are still 9 other scum in this game. I think your single minded tunnel on her is pretty bad regardless of alignment.

RachMarie · Post Post #3973 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:27 am

How do you come up with that number Nero?

Still waiting on a response from Nacho on my other questions. He is a lot better at math than I am and I am trying to figure out how many scum we are likely to have in this game, it helps me sort out reads. Also if this game is multiball or not, helps me sort things out. And by that I mean two mafia teams instead of one, Nero I know you think an SK is enough to make it multiball instead of a single maf team and a 3rd party.

Spy feel free to add in here as well, you are my top town read, and I know you have played in a ton more games than I have. And most likely are also better at math than I am. I suck at statistics ended up dropping out of the class 3 times.

MathBlade · Post Post #3974 (ISO) » Mon Oct 31, 2016 11:36 am

In post 3972, Nero Cain wrote:Math, even if Kraska is scum there are still 9 other scum in this game. I think your single minded tunnel on her is pretty bad regardless of alignment.

You'd think right? But it is actually pretty townie.