STEVEN UNIVERSE 2 - GAME OVER

Creature · Post Post #9550 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:02 am

Alliances?

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #9551 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:03 am

In post 9532, Creature wrote:I wanted to claim what I wanted, not entirely.

In post 9536, Creature wrote:Pregame: Blog post and allied with Snarky.
Night 1: Blog post and tried to ally with Shiro.
Night 2: Blog post and allied with SnarkySnowman.
Night 3: Investigated randomidget, blog post and allied with Shadow_step and Xkfyu.
Night 4: Blog post and tried to ally with grapes.

So what you are saying is that Night 3 – when stress going into Night was +2, you were allied with Snarky Snowman and you successfully got a 3 of 4 investigation of result on random that just happened to be redirected to Almost.

So I either have to believe that Mod screwed up since you were allied with Snarky and thus your Climax action should have failed or I have to believe you are lying …

Which one do you think makes the most sense?

Creature · Post Post #9552 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:03 am

Also, I forgot to say the ability I used on randomidget only works when I'm in an alliance.

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #9553 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:04 am

In post 9546, Creature wrote:
In post 9544, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 9540, Creature wrote:
In post 9538, Reasonably Rational wrote:
In post 9535, Creature wrote:Whenever I am lurking, nobody wants to lynch me.

Whenever I am active, people want to lynch me.
For the record, basically every individual I've had an alliance with has wanted to lynch you, you were just never a priority.

-Cerb
And then when I started trying to push the game, everybody had me as top priority.
Sorta what happens when people slot you as scum, and you do nothing to change their mind, then suddenly show up and remind them that you exist. :p

-Cerb
I do this likely every game. If you think it's a scum tell, it's the same as saying one-liners or putting itself in its readslist are scum tells.

I didn't say I was scum reading you for it. I was just telling you why it happened, sorta in the hopes that you'll remember this in the future and not take it to mean you should just be quiet all game. Honest advice, regardless of alignment.

Anyways.

VOTE: Farside22
-Cerb

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #9554 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:04 am

In post 9531, TheWayItEnds wrote:so just on the fly then?

this does make more sense tbh.

otherwise blaming the person with the best reads in the game as the person with the worst reads in the game wouldnt make much sense.

so why would you do that on purpose unless you completely lack perspective and all sense of personal responsibility.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #9555 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:05 am

@Farside

- Not Chara has a question that she wants you to confirm.

Please explicitly state whether your Ascetic power protects you from Nightkills or not.

Creature · Post Post #9556 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:05 am

In post 9550, Creature wrote:Alliances?

Huh? I thought the night started with +3 stress?

kraskaesque · Post Post #9557 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:05 am

oh wait i forgot that snarky blocked actions. creature answer moi's questions please

Creature · Post Post #9558 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:06 am

I'll ask the mod about that.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #9559 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:07 am

In post 8587, Varsoon wrote:
"Pearls aren't for this! They're for standing around, and looking nice, and holding your stuff for you... right?"

-Peridot,
Back to the Barn

VOTECOUNT 3.12 : LYNCH

DrippingGoofball (LYNCH):
Thefuzzylogic99, SnarkySnowman, MagnaofIllusion, Creature, Titus, Shiro, Firebringer, grapes, McMenno, Farside22, Not Chara

SnarkySnowman (2):
mastin2, TheWayItEnds

Farside22 (1):
Almost50

Shadow_Step (1):
Kraskaeaque

Not Voting (5):
Shadow_Step, Xkfyu, DrippingGoofball, Reasonably Rational, randomidget

With 20 Alive, it takes 11 to Lynch.
Deadline
: (expired on 2016-10-22 19:50:00)

The Current Stress is +2:

Nope

Almost50 · Post Post #9560 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:07 am

In post 9536, Creature wrote:Night 1: Blog post and tried to ally with Shiro.
Night 2: Blog post and allied with SnarkySnowman.

Hold on.. WHAT?? So randomidget NEVER ALLIED with ANYONE for THE WHOLE GAME?? I had him allied with YOU on E1 and with SHIRO on E2, but that can't be true if your quoted statements are accurate.

And how come SHIRO never cared to correct mine and Titus' tables either? I mean, I get that Creature and SS (and random to a lesser extent) do not read the thread properly, but SHIRO??

Creature · Post Post #9561 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:08 am

It's strange though, I'm pretty sure there was a night that started as Tragic Destiny.

Creature · Post Post #9562 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:09 am

No, I allied with randomidget on Pregame but the alliance was open during Day 1 and Night 1.

Almost50 · Post Post #9563 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:10 am

In post 9547, kraskaesque wrote:well i still think the other scum is shadow and not creature

So, I take it that your scum read on TWIE is locked?

Creature · Post Post #9564 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:11 am

Welp, I misunderstood things, there were never any Tragic Destiny.

Creature · Post Post #9565 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:12 am

So 1/4 of these is correct.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #9566 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:16 am

More info from Not Chara since I am now Chara’s personal delivery Gem …

General

– Chara absolutely wants TWIE to be the lynch today for doing no scum-hunting but being here to whine like a child.

@RR

– Beach event proves there are several scum in the “Non-Voters” do not lynch farside, lynch in the Non-Voters even if you think farside is scum. This is directly to you from Chara.

@kraska

– Chara gives you a “thumbs up” from “mom Maheswaran”.

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #9567 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:18 am

I'm doing no scumhunting? You literally just claimed being in a faction that has access to each others role pms. And are now completely trying to ignore that it happened.

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #9568 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:19 am

Someone name a single game where a protown faction could share role pms.

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #9569 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:21 am

Hey mastin how many wins with town factions could share role pms in gistou?

Reasonably Rational · Post Post #9570 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:22 am

In post 9566, MagnaofIllusion wrote:More info from Not Chara since I am now Chara’s personal delivery Gem …

General
– Chara absolutely wants TWIE to be the lynch today for doing no scum-hunting but being here to whine like a child.

@RR
– Beach event proves there are several scum in the “Non-Voters” do not lynch farside, lynch in the Non-Voters even if you think farside is scum. This is directly to you from Chara.

@kraska
– Chara gives you a “thumbs up” from “mom Maheswaran”.

@NC: there are 4 slots among the voters(if we exclude conftown and gems), who have one scum among them, and the rest will be confirmed as town once we find the scum in that group. I'm VERY sure that scum is Farside22, and would much prefer to create 3 more conftown today, than 1)create this same situation tomorrow, if we hit scum outside of the voters, or 2) mislynch+change that pool to a 50/50.

Oh and we'll also be able to fucking pressure peope.being without being concerned that farside's just going to decide to show up and hammer from l-4.

-Cerb

TheWayItEnds · Post Post #9571 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:24 am

In post 9524, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 9519, TheWayItEnds wrote:
In post 9512, TheWayItEnds wrote:
In post 9510, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 9502, Creature wrote:The result was on randomidget though.
Having taken a look at Random's Role PM this clearly is a lie since only 2 of the 4 apply.

Can we lynch this with fire already?
you can see randoms actual role PM?
You seem to be under the impression that I care about your thoughts. Given your earlier response to me I filed you in the "Ignore and lynch soon" pile.

I really like this post where instead of acknowledging it, you went "I'm not answering your questions because you're a meanyface for bringing up how shit I am at mafia"

Almost50 · Post Post #9572 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:24 am

In post 9562, Creature wrote:No, I allied with randomidget on Pregame but the alliance was open during Day 1 and Night 1.

??? Pregame had no active alliances! It would have required a (pre-)pregame phase for you to have picked an ally in pregame.

So, what you're saying is your alliance with random was during pregame and ended with the start of episode 1, then on E1 you were allied with Snarky, then you allied with Shiro on E2, then allied with Snarky AGAIN on E3 (even after you KNEW he was a passive roleblocker), then you allied with Xf+Shadow on E4, then you submitted a request to ally with grapes for E5 which didn't work so you're not allied today.

VOTE: Creature

I also find it highly unlikely the mod would edit your blog to include "incorrect info" as this would be the mod directly lying to us. I could see him redacting certain parts, but "to make private info incorrect." as you put it in 9520 is a bit stretching it.

MagnaofIllusion · Post Post #9573 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:27 am

In post 9564, Creature wrote:Welp, I misunderstood things, there were never any Tragic Destiny.

In post 9565, Creature wrote:So 1/4 of these is correct.

But that's a lie also since 2 of the 4 do apply ...

Tough getting your lies called out and catching you, huh?

kraskaesque · Post Post #9574 (ISO) » Mon Oct 24, 2016 9:29 am

In post 9572, Almost50 wrote:
In post 9562, Creature wrote:No, I allied with randomidget on Pregame but the alliance was open during Day 1 and Night 1.
??? Pregame had no active alliances! It would have required a (pre-)pregame phase for you to have picked an ally in pregame.

So, what you're saying is your alliance with random was during pregame and ended with the start of episode 1, then on E1 you were allied with Snarky, then you allied with Shiro on E2, then allied with Snarky AGAIN on E3 (even after you KNEW he was a passive roleblocker), then you allied with Xf+Shadow on E4, then you submitted a request to ally with grapes for E5 which didn't work so you're not allied today.

VOTE: Creature

I also find it highly unlikely the mod would edit your blog to include "incorrect info" as this would be the mod directly lying to us. I could see him redacting certain parts, but "to make private info incorrect." as you put it in 9520 is a bit stretching it.

i vaguely remember a "mod lies" crumb in one of the blog posts way way back