Tier gains something over night, or has something tomorrow during the day.In post 199, Jaack wrote:@Vedith - We lynch Tier today and skrub tomorrow, sound good?
That's wasn't really a case though. Like at all. You gave a weak reason for scum reading me and it didn't even make sense because you had done the exact same thing right before that. I asked you to explain your reads more in depth and you haven't done that either. Why is light probtown? Why is Ari reasonably town? And why is vax null? I can understand why you're suspicious of tier and Mary but how have they "self confirmed their scum nature"?In post 199, Jaack wrote:There's not much else to explain. I've already stated my case as to why you are scummy. Maru and Tier have self confirmed their own scum nature. Vedith is ridiculously obviously town. I have reasons to believe +__+ is town that I can't get much into, but he's also independently the rather townie. Setup says there must be at least 5 town, so two of the remaining three are required to be town. In order of likelyhood, I'd say Light is probtown, Ari is reasonablely town and Vax is null. But that's kind of just off of memory.In post 197, Skrub wrote:@jaack Can you go further in depth with explaining your reads?
@Vedith - We lynch Tier today and skrub tomorrow, sound good?
Nobody has any comments on this?In post 185, Skrub wrote:Why would someone who is town say this instead of being glad that they know who's 3rd party now? It makes it easier to sort people out and you can grill the 3rd parties to find out whether or not you can trust them.In post 54, light_ganski wrote:Why do people keep claiming 'third party but don't kill me', its not exactly useful
VOTE: TierShift
He says this and then format make any effort to try and figure out of tier is really scum. It's just an empty post. Even when he votes for him again in his next post he doesn't ask tier any questions.In post 116, light_ganski wrote:Considering the mechanics of this game, could this be a scum gambit?
VOTE: MaruchanIf we can't take their claims at their word why aren't you interacting with any of them to figure out which ones you can trust?In post 177, light_ganski wrote:I get why you trust this but consider this scenario: scum claims third party and says they can win with town. We can't necessarily take third party claims at their wordIn post 174, Vedith wrote:See, this is neutral that I trustIn post 166, Maruchan wrote:Plus, I haven't indicated that I CAN'T win with the town, nor have I indicated a willingness to win with any other faction, unlike Tierce, so you'd think that you'd be more willing to listen to me than to tierceOh and didn't you say that you have to change your vote in every post? Why'd you stop doing it?In post 183, light_ganski wrote:In post 182, Aristophanes wrote:So he's not town. There's gonna be tons of nit town. He's wiling to make more towny wincon available,. Why don't we a want this?or so it seems
The bolded is precisely my reason for not automatically trusting a day one non-town claim. What if he is the serial killer, and he's lying about getting the serial killer to 'team up' with him? It would be an awful good way to screw us over
I had nothing to add or say on the matter.In post 203, Skrub wrote:Nobody has any comments on this?
The {light, ari, vax} reads were just from gut and memory. I've kind of felt light to be townie whenever she's posted, ari too, but less so, and I have very little memory of vax in this game, but I don't remember anything that stood out as very scummy. A quick review of their isos doesn't change any of my previous opinions on them significantly, but I'll try to add a little more.In post 202, Skrub wrote:That's wasn't really a case though. Like at all. You gave a weak reason for scum reading me and it didn't even make sense because you had done the exact same thing right before that. I asked you to explain your reads more in depth and you haven't done that either. Why is light probtown? Why is Ari reasonably town? And why is vax null? I can understand why you're suspicious of tier and Mary but how have they "self confirmed their scum nature"?
In post 190, TierShift wrote:
My role says I can win with town but town wincon says I cannot so I'm asking mod for clarification rn
What is a role buddy?In post 195, Jaack wrote:
@+__+: Are we role buddies now? Because this will be the best game ever if we are.
I was wondering if you had figured out my role and/or your role.In post 207, +__+ wrote:What is a role buddy?In post 195, Jaack wrote:
@+__+: Are we role buddies now? Because this will be the best game ever if we are.
What? I mean actually, what? Why the hell would I be glad of someone revealing they are not town, but oh no we mustn't lynch them they've got to team up with the serial killer first? I mean if you're going to say that you should come out and full claim and then let us decide based on the claim. All claiming non-specific third party does is force us to make decisions based on incomplete information. There is no way of knowing whether or not we should trust them.In post 185, Skrub wrote:Why would someone who is town say this instead of being glad that they know who's 3rd party now? It makes it easier to sort people out and you can grill the 3rd parties to find out whether or not you can trust them.In post 54, light_ganski wrote:Why do people keep claiming 'third party but don't kill me', its not exactly useful
VOTE: TierShift
Until this post I was reasonably confident tier was the SK making a gambit here, but quite frankly this post suggests he's your buddy.In post 185, Skrub wrote:He says this and then format make any effort to try and figure out of tier is really scum. It's just an empty post. Even when he votes for him again in his next post he doesn't ask tier any questions.In post 116, light_ganski wrote:Considering the mechanics of this game, could this be a scum gambit?
VOTE: Maruchan
Lazy scum hunting right here. Yep I forgot to change my vote, check the fucking vote count and you'll see it reverts to a self-vote if I fail to change my voteIn post 185, Skrub wrote:If we can't take their claims at their word why aren't you interacting with any of them to figure out which ones you can trust?In post 177, light_ganski wrote:I get why you trust this but consider this scenario: scum claims third party and says they can win with town. We can't necessarily take third party claims at their wordIn post 174, Vedith wrote:See, this is neutral that I trustIn post 166, Maruchan wrote:Plus, I haven't indicated that I CAN'T win with the town, nor have I indicated a willingness to win with any other faction, unlike Tierce, so you'd think that you'd be more willing to listen to me than to tierceOh and didn't you say that you have to change your vote in every post? Why'd you stop doing it?In post 183, light_ganski wrote:In post 182, Aristophanes wrote:So he's not town. There's gonna be tons of nit town. He's wiling to make more towny wincon available,. Why don't we a want this?or so it seems
The bolded is precisely my reason for not automatically trusting a day one non-town claim. What if he is the serial killer, and he's lying about getting the serial killer to 'team up' with him? It would be an awful good way to screw us over
Yeah right, why would you have said this then:In post 221, Skrub wrote:Oh shit, I thought he was at L-2. Eh, doesn't really matter because he's scum anyway.
Scum confirmed, you eat rope tomorrowSkrub wrote:VOTE: tiershift
Thanks for bussing your buddy, light.
