Also:
Just in case
Started reading the moment I offered to replace, haven't been here for a long time so anything that helps me get a hang of how stuff works helps. Also cuz I would have to read it anyways if I entered.In post 1816, House wrote:In six hours?In post 1814, malpascp wrote:Hey guys,I've already read the whole thread, but have to re-read, brb later
???In post 1828, Gamma Emerald wrote:What if the scum townreads me?In post 1827, House wrote:If you weren't scum, you'd have been hammered long ago bro.In post 1824, Gamma Emerald wrote:Well who is scum then? Other than me.
So out of 6 players, you're going with those two, putting one of them at L-1, and your highest scumread so far is now obvtown because they were at L-1 for 5 seconds and were not hammered.
On Huntress? Don't think so. Doesn't feel the least scummy to me. In fact, if someone were to quickhammer her, I'd vote them tomorrow no matter what. Especially given how strong your case on her is /sIn post 1848, House wrote:And I'm feeling better about your slot for not doing the Instahammer thing.In post 1846, malpascp wrote:I meant that when Gamma was at L-1, he could have been hammered. Apparently not true.
Also just because Huntress didn't have the chance to hammer Gamma, that makes Gamma town?
Hey House what are the chances you're scum?
Pedit:Yes it's L-1
Didn't get what you said sryIn post 1851, House wrote:Yeah pretty much, bearing on mind that this game does not exist in the bubble that you popped in at.In post 1849, malpascp wrote:So out of 6 players, you're going with those two, putting one of them at L-1, and your highest scumread so far is now obvtown because they were at L-1 for 5 seconds and were not hammered.
No way it's not a 3-man scum team. With 3 maf, town can afford 3 mislynches (i think?). Don't see a 2-man team here unless there's some crazy PR.In post 1862, House wrote:If Huntress flips town, there is only a two person scum team and the last scum is gerry.In post 1860, malpascp wrote:*sigh*
What if Huntress flips town? You literally think everyone else besides her and gerry is town.
That's the case if our win con is the same. I'll believe it is for now.
You're actually cleared if she flips town, but back on the block as a suspect if she flips scum.
Or maybe that's not why scum killed Grendel.In post 1880, House wrote:If scum killed Grendel to have me mislynch Gamma, why would scum!CCC say scum!Gamma makes no sense with me alive and that i was left alive to mislynch him?
Does not compute. CCC is town.
Huntress case is basically PoE and it's slightly pissing me off.In post 1881, Manuel87 wrote:I still dont see why Huntress is scum. Her case on House is bad but that doesnt mean she is scum.
I also thought about the possibility of House being scum but it would never make sense for him to save town and get his buddy lynched.
CCCs case is bad there is nothing about why Huntress is scum only why others could possibly maybe not be scum.
Like i said Grendel dying last night over House doesnt clear Gamma as Grendel was most likely vote Gamma today.
malpascp not hammering Huntress right now doesnt clear him for me if she flips green because a second lolhammer is like admitting to be scum.
But so far i start to like his slot more i would appreciate a readlist with some thoughts about everybody from him tomorrow.
I would like to hear the reasosns why people are voting Huntress right now.
House's PM either says he kills the killer, or it doesn't. Jesus.In post 1930, gerryoat wrote:So you wouldn't take a 50% chance of potential auto win? Thanks for letting us know
So what would you call a BG that kills both the BG and the attacker?In post 1939, House wrote:Not here you haven't.In post 1937, malpascp wrote:Pedit: I think I've seen variations where BG does kill the attacker. It's still dumb to assume such a thing.
It stops being a bodyguard when it becomes a killing role.
FTFYIn post 1964, House wrote:If you're not scum, I am.In post 1961, gerryoat wrote:Anyway, as mafia I would have killed the claimed BG, cause that's how I figured it worked. And would have assumed it was potential auto loss if I didn't
Malpa def is not.
tbh I always unvote when replacing in. By that logic scum should always vote whoever the biggest wagon is, and that's just poor reasoning. I appreciate it though.In post 1967, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think I should explain why mal is town to me.
Why would scum unvote me when coming in? Makes more sense to change vote after checking who is the best target. Leaving his vote on me would have been more preferable due to leaving me closer to being lynched.
Basically, mal is cleared to me because scum would not do what he did starting out if I was town, and I know I town so he can't be scum.
In post 1929, Gamma Emerald wrote:I mean not all implementations.In post 1928, gerryoat wrote:No shit. Which is why i said potential. It's 50/50. Congrats trying to save your partnerIn post 1927, Gamma Emerald wrote: BG doesn't always kill the killer I think.
This answer was weird af, why'd you repeat yourself AGAIN while ignoring what he was saying, instead of just checking it after someone pointing you a role doesn't work the way you're describing. Sounds like you pushed further on the subject on purpose to make it seem like you're newbtown.In post 1930, gerryoat wrote:So you wouldn't take a 50% chance of potential auto win? Thanks for letting us know
In post 1928, gerryoat wrote:No shit. Which is why i said potential. It's 50/50. Congrats trying to save your partnerIn post 1927, Gamma Emerald wrote: BG doesn't always kill the killer I think.
In post 1929, Gamma Emerald wrote:I mean not all implementations.In post 1928, gerryoat wrote:No shit. Which is why i said potential. It's 50/50. Congrats trying to save your partnerIn post 1927, Gamma Emerald wrote: BG doesn't always kill the killer I think.
Even if you thought it was 50/50, that last post made zero sense. He told you it might not be 50/50 but you're still going with it.In post 1930, gerryoat wrote:So you wouldn't take a 50% chance of potential auto win? Thanks for letting us know
I'm guessing you don't want to hear a claim, Mr I-Set-Up-Every-Lynch.In post 1977, House wrote:If either of gerry or mal hammer, I'm hounding theotherone to the gates of hell tomorrow.
Be smart, bus yo buddy.
I actually feel like a moron because I put so much thought into my votes, while this guy is just throwing them around like confetti.
No point in setup spec right now.In post 2142, House wrote:I don't think there's a third scum...
In post 2032, Manuel87 wrote: Other one is malpascp i liked his early posts but after that 2 things caught my attention.In post 1920, malpascp wrote:Can't think straight right now.
Should Huntress be claiming right now?
And who thinks we should go for a House lynch if Huntress flips town?
Pedit: doesn't really matter at this point, scum would do it for survival anywaysI dont like the silly guy play asking what Huntress should do. For me it doesnt fit his play.I honestly have no clue what you're talking about here, if you check you'll see I've been out of here for a few years so it's a natural question about the standard procedure
Why would he ask about you now before the flip and before the Nightkill? My guess is Huntress is town and he wants to know if he can set up a lynch on you tomorrow if he keeps you alive tonight.Getting an answer from House is very different from getting to know his actions tonight. You should know better.
He is dead set on hammering her because she claimed Bullet-proof? Doesnt make sense to me.In post 1997, malpascp wrote:Bulletproof townie is a joke of a claim.
Intent to hammer
Not hammering so we can discuss more before night comes.
House, you planning on using your ability?Already explained
He was sure there have to be 3 scum because 2 scum would be unbalanced until House explained 3 scum would mean 2 misslynches.
Bulletproof balances out 3 scum quite well thats why i want to know why her claim is so that he wants to hammer her right after that post.He also played dumb about the lolhammer his slot did when i mentioned it.In post 1985, malpascp wrote:Jesus Christ you're so dead if Huntress flips town.What the hell are you expecting me to say about this? "Oh my slot lolhammered town yesterday? Well, guess I must be scum huh?". Seriously what is it that you expected to hear? Also I don't even know why you quoted this.
VOTE: malpascp
I don't play dumb/silly/whatever. If you think me asking if Huntress should claim at L-1 is scummy, so be it, I don't really care, and you should have more to worry about anyway. What I find weird is that it seems nothing changed for you since Huntress flipped.In post 2161, Manuel87 wrote:It doesnt matter how many years you didnt play, Huntress had to claim at that point. She probably didnt claim earlier because it helps scum.
Your question wasnt directed at House so what is this answer about?
No you didnt explain you just repeated that BP claim is absurd but you never explained why you think so.
You ignored the next point because you cant answer it?
I already mentioned that you dont need to explain anything about the lolhammer but fact is your slot did it and i will not ignore this fact or let you brush it off as if it has nothing to do with you.
The quote is part of the argument you ignored.
You were suspicious of House until Huntress claimed even to the point were you said what i quoted.
So explain why her claim changed your reads because you still didnt do that.
FTFYIn post 2198, Gamma Emerald wrote:Gerry is right here. He put his neck on the line to defend town, and his vote was not a plea vote. Dude's town. Meaning we have auto between CCC andGamma.