Mini 1830 - Game Over

[House]

Sorry, was away for a bit and saw my response didn't submit before I left.

[gerryoat]

^

@mal that's why I said it twice in that situation.

[House]

If either of gerry or mal hammer, I'm hounding the

other

one to the gates of hell tomorrow.

Be smart, bus yo buddy.

[malpascp]

BG doesn't always kill the killer I think.

No shit. Which is why i said potential. It's 50/50. Congrats trying to save your partner

BG doesn't always kill the killer I think.

No shit. Which is why i said potential. It's 50/50. Congrats trying to save your partner

I mean not all implementations.

So you wouldn't take a 50% chance of potential auto win? Thanks for letting us know

Even if you thought it was 50/50, that last post made zero sense. He told you it might not be 50/50 but you're still going with it.

[malpascp]

If either of gerry or mal hammer, I'm hounding the

other

one to the gates of hell tomorrow.

Be smart, bus yo buddy.

I'm guessing you don't want to hear a claim, Mr I-Set-Up-Every-Lynch.

[House]

If either of gerry or mal hammer, I'm hounding the

other

one to the gates of hell tomorrow.

Be smart, bus yo buddy.

I'm guessing you don't want to hear a claim, Mr I-Set-Up-Every-Lynch.

JoaT flipped.
Watcher flipped.
Bodyguard claimed. Not cc'ed.

Nope, not interested in a scum fakeclaim.

[gerryoat]

BG doesn't always kill the killer I think.

No shit. Which is why i said potential. It's 50/50. Congrats trying to save your partner

BG doesn't always kill the killer I think.

No shit. Which is why i said potential. It's 50/50. Congrats trying to save your partner

I mean not all implementations.

So you wouldn't take a 50% chance of potential auto win? Thanks for letting us know

Even if you thought it was 50/50, that last post made zero sense. He told you it might not be 50/50 but you're still going with it.

I don't get what you're saying. He stated he KNEW it didn't work like epicmafia, but still didn't correct me

[malpascp]

You say it's 50/50, he says it's not always 50/50, and you're like "why'd you do that when it's 50/50 lol". That's the exchange I'm talking about, not the one afterwards. Right here, on this post, while you were arguing something extremely important, you just outright ignored the explanation that was just given (in case you're lost, the explanation I'm talking about here is Gamma saying "not all implementations"). Literally you post, someone corrects you, and you post again reinforcing the point you were making before.

[gerryoat]

Oh I see what you mean now. I thought he was trying to rationalize house not being on someone in the way I thought it worked, which is why I was saying he wouldn't take the chance?

[House]

If either of gerry or mal hammer, I'm hounding the

other

one to the gates of hell tomorrow.

Be smart, bus yo buddy.

I'm guessing you don't want to hear a claim, Mr I-Set-Up-Every-Lynch.

Okay.

Let's look at those lynches, shall we?

eager: tons of friction and arm twisting
Victor: minimal obstruction aside from Victor himself
Gamma (almost): minimal obstruction aside from Gamma
Huntress: tons of friction and arm twisting

Things that make you go hmmm.

[malpascp]

Jesus Christ you're so dead if Huntress flips town.

[malpascp]

Also I don't think you can call what's happening here is "tons of friction and arm twisting". Huntress didn't even comment on the fact people are voting on her. Most friction was people arguing about your weird ass posting.

[Huntress]

That's what I thought at first, then he directly stated that he was tricking scum.

What made you believe him?

I'm voting Huntress for playing it too safe, especially around my wagon.

Explain please.

[Huntress]

I'm giving the "Gamma Is Town" hypothesis a good look because I think that House has a good point; leaving House alive looks a lot like trying to end up getting Gamma lynched, which suggests that it might be a mislynch.

If both were town, which do you think scum would consider more of a threat: House or Gamma?

She did step into the game and almost immediately leap to a suspiciously convenient scumread, which she's then sat on and pushed ever since.

What was "suspiciously convenient" about my initial reads (four of them, not one as you claim here)? "Almost immediately" is inaccurate too.

[Huntress]

Look at the positioning Huntress is doing. She was setting up to demand my lynch after Gamma flipped town.

Nope. I want you lynched first.

JoaT flipped.
Watcher flipped.
Bodyguard claimed. Not cc'ed.

Almost all my posts since your claim have raised a question about your claim, which I guess is the real reason you're attacking me.

I'm a bullet-proof townie

and although it's not a direct counterclaim, I don't see us having four town PRs in an eleven player game, especially where three of them have a chance of preventing a kill (Square claimed a block).

[Gamma Emerald]

That's what I thought at first, then he directly stated that he was tricking scum.

What made you believe him?

I'm voting Huntress for playing it too safe, especially around my wagon.

Explain please.

1) I suspected the same thing as you, but when he explained it it made a lot of sense thanks to The Thing.
2) You have been Ehh on your read on me all of Day 3. Like you're deliberately avoiding forming a hard opinion on me.

[Gamma Emerald]

I don't believe Huntress's claim. I believe BP is quite a safe PR for scum to claim as it is a direct reason for scum to not lynch them, explaining their survival.

[House]

I don't believe Huntress's claim. I believe BP is quite a safe PR for scum to claim as it is a direct reason for scum to not lynch them, explaining their survival.

Winner, winner. Chicken Dinner.

[Huntress]

1) I suspected the same thing as you, but when he explained it it made a lot of sense thanks to The Thing.
2) You have been Ehh on your read on me all of Day 3. Like you're deliberately avoiding forming a hard opinion on me.

1) Where did he explain it? I don't recall seeing anything satisfactory about it.
2) That's because I don't have a hard opinion on you. Gut says town - you "feel fair but look foul" - but there's a lot of sheeping, buddying etc., that I didn't like. Stuff like 1591, where your argument against Jester's hammer could be equally well applied to your L-1 vote.

[Eggman]

Vote Count 3.05

Not Voting

: Manuel87, malpascp

Gamma Emerald

: gerryoat

House

: Huntress

Huntress

: CCC, Gamma Emerald, House

(L-1)

V/LA: Gamma Emerald, (expired on 2016-10-11 00:00:00)

With 7 players alive, it takes

4

players for a lynch.
The deadline for this day is (expired on 2016-10-17 14:00:00).

[Gamma Emerald]

1)

House saying there could be both bodyguard and doctor in the game doesn't make sense and I don't think he's explained it, has he?

@ House:

Can you explain this please? Or if you have, can you link me to it?.

To elaborate: House wanted to trick scum into fakeclaiming doctor.

Not really, but lol.

He may not have said it himself, but he agreed when I said it.
2) How does
Quickhammer = changes vote after counterclaim?

[House]

2) That's because I don't have a hard opinion on you. Gut says town - you "feel fair but look foul" - but there's a lot of sheeping, buddying etc., that I didn't like.

And instead of seeking clarification, you were happy to sit back and let me lynch him and only spoke up after his wagon fell apart.

Funny, that.

[malpascp]

Bulletproof townie is a joke of a claim.

Intent to hammer

Not hammering so we can discuss more before night comes.

House, you planning on using your ability?

[House]

House, you planning on using your ability?

Kinda undermine the point if I answered that, wouldn't it?

[malpascp]

Also there's at least 3 town PRs. We should assume there's at least one for scum.
Did Square claim his abilities? Can't find it.

Pedit: Let's say you used it, who'd you target?