Mafia 73: NEGWLTWWWTKY - Abandoned!

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #250 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:03 am

It sounded like a good idea at the time but there ain't no flavor in this game, so I was wondering why you would ask that.

Battle Mage · Post Post #251 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:15 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:It sounded like a good idea at the time but there ain't no flavor in this game, so I was wondering why you would ask that.

omfg!!!

You totally blew that trap, didnt you?

CONFIRM VOTE: ALBERT

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #252 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:55 am

Are you...an idiot ? Do you honestly believe that the mafia would have flavor and the town wouldn't ?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #253 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:57 am

The first thing mafia do when they invent a flavor is to check their own, anyway. Your "trap" is stupid, vain, and try-hard.

Unvote, vote BM

Battle Mage · Post Post #254 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:57 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:Are you...an idiot ? Do you honestly believe that the mafia would have flavor and the town wouldn't ?

no...
I was thinking that maybe if Peers-scum didnt realise that the vanilla role pm was in the OP, we might be able to get him to claim something slightly different-but different enough to distinguish between that and the actual vanilla pm.

You Fool...

BM

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #255 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:58 am

Right. I'm sure. Vote stands.

Battle Mage · Post Post #256 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:59 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:The first thing mafia do when they invent a flavor is to check their own, anyway. Your "trap" is stupid, vain, and try-hard.

Unvote, vote BM

erm, are you a fucking moron?

read my previous post, and think before you post in future. Alternatively, just dont post atall, and then you wont f up a great plan. Its pretty obvious that if he didnt claim his rolename as 'Villager' we would have confirmation of his guilty.

I'm lost for words at your stupidity....

BM

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #257 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:01 pm

lol K. You're such a weirdo BM.

Peers · Post Post #258 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:03 pm

.... so, you both think I'm an idiot as well as scum. Well, nice to know you're both wrong on two counts.

schismatized · Post Post #259 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 6:44 pm

Ok heres what we do: lynch peers.

Peers · Post Post #260 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:08 pm

No, we don't lynch Peers. We find some scum to lynch. Better for the town if we actually lynch scum.

PJ. · Post Post #261 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 7:52 pm

I don't like how carried away TS is..

Erg0 · Post Post #262 (ISO) » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:01 pm

I, on the other hand, think that her point on MoS's case was somewhat valid.

Peers hasn't done much to change my mind, but I want to ask this directly.

Peers: are you just trying really hard to act casual in order to avoid your apparent "flipping out under pressure" meta? If so, you'd be much better off being useful rather than being cool.

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #263 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:26 am

TS is a crackpot idiot who gets way too carried away divulging herself in ridiculous theories that are so strung out they fall apart like a house of cards if a breeze comes through. I'm more than willing to policy lynch a person like that in any game, unless I have a better suspect. And since it's only page 11 on Day 1 of a large game, that's a damn good place for my vote.

Mastermind of Sin · Post Post #264 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:30 am

Also, it's a bit more than just a policy lynch. I don't have

fun

playing in games with people like that any more. But I have fun playing with most of the rest of you, so I'm not about to replace out. Therefore, I am also voting to eliminate the funsucker from this game. That person is TS. It's pretty simple, really. TS is not fun to play mafia with anymore. It doesn't really have anything to do with my alignment or her alignment. I just don't want to play in the same game with her.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #265 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:56 am

MoS is a jester. Vig him tonight plz.

Peers · Post Post #266 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:28 am

Erg0 wrote:Peers: are you just trying really hard to act casual in order to avoid your apparent "flipping out under pressure" meta? If so, you'd be much better off being useful rather than being cool.

Well, I've already partially flipped out, and it hasn't done me any good, so.

Personally? I've given my reasons for my vote... and MoS has slowly moved up the list. You don't see me voting for A.B.R. even though he's got a tendency to suck the fun out of the game, because every once in a while he actually posts something intelligent (it could be random coincidence, but heck... if there can be games where I agree with BM, anything can happen and policy lynches are bad).

Quagmire · Post Post #267 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:46 am

Mastermind of Sin wrote:Also, it's a bit more than just a policy lynch. I don't have
fun
playing in games with people like that any more. But I have fun playing with most of the rest of you, so I'm not about to replace out. Therefore, I am also voting to eliminate the funsucker from this game. That person is TS. It's pretty simple, really. TS is not fun to play mafia with anymore. It doesn't really have anything to do with my alignment or her alignment. I just don't want to play in the same game with her.

Albert B. is right, MoS. You're better than posts like that.

And you know it's true when it comes form me.

PJ. · Post Post #268 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:45 am

wow, nice peers.

Battle Mage · Post Post #269 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:14 am

Peers wrote:.... so, you both think I'm an idiot as well as scum. Well, nice to know you're both wrong on two counts.

erm if i was convinced you were scum, i'd be voting for you. Unfortunately now we cant test your claim, and you keep making such lame WIFOM posts, its hard to see how you will survive today, even though you arent the scummiest player here.

BM

Peers · Post Post #270 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:26 am

I'm trying to use the same technique A.B.R. uses and be scummy as hell, just in an asshole way and not in a scum way. It seems to work for him. Be too hated to waste a NK on, but not quite scummy enough to lynch. Altho I've yet to resort to Jester-speculation and Vig-direction.

JordanA24 · Post Post #271 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:45 am

Mastermind of Sin wrote:Also, it's a bit more than just a policy lynch. I don't have
fun
playing in games with people like that any more. But I have fun playing with most of the rest of you, so I'm not about to replace out. Therefore, I am also voting to eliminate the funsucker from this game. That person is TS. It's pretty simple, really. TS is not fun to play mafia with anymore. It doesn't really have anything to do with my alignment or her alignment. I just don't want to play in the same game with her.

Although you may hate TS, this is not a protown thing to do, if we went through with it, and TS was town, we'd just waste a lynch wouldn't we?

Albert B. Rampage wrote:MoS is a jester. Vig him tonight plz.

What's with the Jester obsession? Why can't MoS be a badly playing scum?

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #272 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:51 am

This isn't scummy, its just plain anti-town. MoS is anti-town. He will be vigged, end of story.

PJ. · Post Post #273 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 7:57 am

Well, either ABR is vig and just got himself a NK or he is a Night Jester, or he is simply ABR(the tard).

Battle Mage · Post Post #274 (ISO) » Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:03 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:This isn't scummy, its just plain anti-town. MoS is anti-town. He will be vigged, end of story.

anti-town can be scummy. MoS is being anti-town and scummy, and should be looked at closely, end of story.

Peers, post 270 is pretty dumb. ABR gets lynched lots for his scummy play.

BM