No you didn't.In post 1123, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I already told you why I don't agree with your CCC read!In post 1119, House wrote:Please stop creating noise, you two.
Neither of you are getting lynched unless one of CCC or Gamma flips town.
If you want to be productive, get on one of those two or tell me why I'm wrong.
I could see you being scum, but I'm more confident in Gerry right now.Gamma Emerald wrote:What about me, Victor?
I'm sure I did, but it's too late, and I'm not bothering to self ISO myself nor your case. IIRC your case was mostly just signs that CCC doesn't play in a way that you expect town to. Looking over his last games he seems to be a newish player, with a somewhat unconventional playstyle. I didn't find anything incriminating and your strongest point was actually CCC correcting a mistake I made.House wrote:No you didn't.In post 1123, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I already told you why I don't agree with your CCC read!In post 1119, House wrote:Please stop creating noise, you two.
Neither of you are getting lynched unless one of CCC or Gamma flips town.
If you want to be productive, get on one of those two or tell me why I'm wrong.
People will just have to the live with the distraction of multiple wagons because I'm not unvoting tonight.Also, you should be voting Gamma since you can't argue that one.
Not to discourage you from doing the right thing, but why are you doing what I'm asking if you are not up to speed?In post 1127, Grendel wrote:I actually didn't study the game at all last night, I should go back and adjust my reads now that I have flips to work with.
Terrible.In post 1128, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I'm sure I did, but it's too late, and I'm not bothering to self ISO myself nor your case. IIRC your case was mostly just signs that CCC doesn't play in a way that you expect town to. Looking over his last games he seems to be a newish player, with a somewhat unconventional playstyle. I didn't find anything incriminating and your strongest point was actually CCC correcting a mistake I made.
if you are that certain the last two scum are in those three players then you could just get one lynched each day and win. hypothecally you should have no qualms with voting in that bracket, even if you mislynch today, you've found the last two scum lordz yeah?In post 1107, CCC wrote:So I think that the last two Mafia can probably be found in {Gamma Emerald, The_Jester, gerry_oat}. I'd rather like to hear from each of these people before deciding where to put my vote (and preferably from everyone else too)... but, at the moment, I'd definitely prefer to put my vote inside that set.
I'm not voting Gamma for you. I'm voting Gamma because he is scum.In post 1129, House wrote:Not to discourage you from doing the right thing, but why are you doing what I'm asking if you are not up to speed?In post 1127, Grendel wrote:I actually didn't study the game at all last night, I should go back and adjust my reads now that I have flips to work with.
I want a catch-up series, with plenty of fresh notes.In post 1127, Grendel wrote:I actually didn't study the game at all last night, I should go back and adjust my reads now that I have flips to work with.
A quick ISO scan confirmed this, feeling better about you again.In post 1133, Grendel wrote:I'm not voting Gamma for you. I'm voting Gamma because he is scum.
Like I have been saying forever now.
Note #1: You are scum.In post 1134, Gamma Emerald wrote:I want a catch-up series, with plenty of fresh notes.In post 1127, Grendel wrote:I actually didn't study the game at all last night, I should go back and adjust my reads now that I have flips to work with.
Shut up. This will help me read him.In post 1136, House wrote:Note #1: You are scum.In post 1134, Gamma Emerald wrote:I want a catch-up series, with plenty of fresh notes.In post 1127, Grendel wrote:I actually didn't study the game at all last night, I should go back and adjust my reads now that I have flips to work with.
Don't worry, hell repeat it for you.In post 1137, Gamma Emerald wrote:Shut up. This will help me read him.In post 1136, House wrote:Note #1: You are scum.In post 1134, Gamma Emerald wrote:I want a catch-up series, with plenty of fresh notes.In post 1127, Grendel wrote:I actually didn't study the game at all last night, I should go back and adjust my reads now that I have flips to work with.
Explain this, please.In post 1139, Huntress wrote:Also Grendel as I had him down as a possible associate of CCC and/or eager.
I would like to here more of your cases (town and scum) on ppl. I'm not sure what to make of you currently.In post 1139, Huntress wrote:Going to recheck my read on Gamma because I was getting a more town vibe from him towards the end of Day one. Also Grendel as I had him down as a possible associate of CCC and/or eager.
Vote: CCC
That was @Grendel, FYI. Also, he just left.In post 1143, Gamma Emerald wrote:Will you grant my request?
I'm doing a readlist thoroughly explaining my thoughts and feelings on the roster.In post 1143, Gamma Emerald wrote:Will you grant my request?
I'm back and forth trying to submit online hw before 12. sryGamma Emerald wrote:That was @Grendel, FYI. Also, he just left.In post 1143, Gamma Emerald wrote:Will you grant my request?Great.
