real lifeIn post 249, VictorDeAngelo wrote:@SquareWorld- Why have you gone from posting nothing to suddenly spamming the thread?
calm down, i dont get a read on everyone within 2 daysAnd on another note why not a direct response to 229. Should I infer Gerry and Manual are your only scumreads?
I post my analysis of the player before the summary of their posts. This is obvious if you are reading the post. Some people do it different, where they link the post number and then put their thoughts on that post next to the number. I could do that, but that's not the way I did it that time.In post 254, Manuel87 wrote:While i think he has a valid point that its not really an analysis but rather a summary of what said player posted that game,
In post 254, Manuel87 wrote:I dont like how Square world playes but its not a reason to lynch him.
What i dont like about him right now is that he mentioned how eagers analysis on RhazhBash sucks.
While i think he has a valid point that its not really an analysis but rather a summary of what said player posted that game, i dont understand why he only refers to the RhazhBash analysis and not to the ones on Victor and Gerry.
@Square: Why do you think Gerry is scum?
If you must know, I liked his response to the second question in 250.eagerSnake wrote:@Victor What exactly has Square World done that was inherently townie?
I'm putting Manuel back into my "would lynch today" pile for this post.In post 254, Manuel87 wrote:I dont like how Square world playes but its not a reason to lynch him.
What i dont like about him right now is that he mentioned how eagers analysis on RhazhBash sucks.
While i think he has a valid point that its not really an analysis but rather a summary of what said player posted that game, i dont understand why he only refers to the RhazhBash analysis and not to the ones on Victor and Gerry.
@Square: Why do you think Gerry is scum?
Yes but why bother to summarise what he posted when you dont tell us your thoughts on those posts but only your over all read on him?In post 256, eagerSnake wrote:I post my analysis of the player before the summary of their posts. This is obvious if you are reading the post. Some people do it different, where they link the post number and then put their thoughts on that post next to the number. I could do that, but that's not the way I did it that time.In post 254, Manuel87 wrote:While i think he has a valid point that its not really an analysis but rather a summary of what said player posted that game,
So this post only comes from town now?In post 250, Square World wrote:real lifeIn post 249, VictorDeAngelo wrote:@SquareWorld- Why have you gone from posting nothing to suddenly spamming the thread?
calm down, i dont get a read on everyone within 2 daysAnd on another note why not a direct response to 229. Should I infer Gerry and Manual are your only scumreads?
This is Victor's read on Gamma. How does he have a town read on Square World based off the one post quoted above, but only a null read on Gamma? Doesn't make sense.In post 229, VictorDeAngelo wrote:He's not a townread, more null. Simply put, while he hasn't done anything particularly townie, he is contributing and hasn't done anything scummy IMO so I'm not concerned about him at this moment in time.
lol there are moreIn post 254, Manuel87 wrote:While i think he has a valid point that its not really an analysis but rather a summary of what said player posted that game, i dont understand why he only refers to the RhazhBash analysis and not to the ones on Victor and Gerry.
Here's a peak into the spinning gearwheels of my brain:In post 259, Manuel87 wrote:Yes but why bother to summarise what he posted when you dont tell us your thoughts on those posts but only your over all read on him?In post 256, eagerSnake wrote:I post my analysis of the player before the summary of their posts. This is obvious if you are reading the post. Some people do it different, where they link the post number and then put their thoughts on that post next to the number. I could do that, but that's not the way I did it that time.In post 254, Manuel87 wrote:While i think he has a valid point that its not really an analysis but rather a summary of what said player posted that game,
Also your post summary on Victor has only on short comment on you liking him not pushing his scumread on Rhazh.
But in all 3 i see no real read from you. I could assume that you think Gerry is Null and Rhazh is slight scumlean but you never said that.
Why do you like that he isnt pushing his read on Rhazh?
Oh sure. But you sure were quick to make your vote on me serious when I said I townread Gamma based on his response, right? Convenient.In post 262, VictorDeAngelo wrote:So now I'm not allowed to form different opinions on different players?
maybe you have to learn to see the post i quotedIn post 254, Manuel87 wrote:@Square: Why do you think Gerry is scum?
The two aren't comparable.In post 264, eagerSnake wrote:Oh sure. But you sure were quick to make your vote on me serious when I said I townread Gamma based on his response, right? Convenient.In post 262, VictorDeAngelo wrote:So now I'm not allowed to form different opinions on different players?
I don't accept metagame defenses that allow people to get away with always being scummy.In post 269, Square World wrote:eagerSnake
if you meta'd me, you would notice i usually don't explain my posts
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh! Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad lie
Based on 74 alone? None. Like I said when I first called out 74, it could come from scum or town.In post 268, VictorDeAngelo wrote:However I find it surprising that once again your pulling me back towards my vote on you. What percentage of your scumread on me is based on 74?
Too convenient.In post 271, eagerSnake wrote:I don't accept metagame defenses that allow people to get away with always being scummy.In post 269, Square World wrote:eagerSnake
if you meta'd me, you would notice i usually don't explain my posts
Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh! Oh-oh-oh-oh-oh-oh!
Caught in a bad lie
I dispute that I'm doing nothing to advance the town's cause. I also dispute that I didn't explain my reasons for voting when I quoted the post in question right before voting. And as I believe I said before, it's not my fault Rhazh has been quiet since a wagon started on him (though that is suspicious in and of itself).eagerSnake wrote:Based on 74 alone? None. Like I said when I first called out 74, it could come from scum or town.In post 268, VictorDeAngelo wrote:However I find it surprising that once again your pulling me back towards my vote on you. What percentage of your scumread on me is based on 74?
You think RhazhBash is scum, but if you seriously think that, then you are doing nothing to advance the town's cause besides placing a vote and saying, "No, I'm not explaining", that draws my attention. It's a refusal to make a case on someone, which I stated before is inherently scummy. Town should be worried that the town will mislynch, and should push their reads.
To the first question I call bullshit. I have posted plenty of honest opinions in this game.Question for both VictorDeAngelo and Square World: Do you think that posting your honest opinions will hurt you? Why, then, do you refuse to explain things?
Ok then that question was dumb.