Open 54 - Basic 12 Player (over) before 529

[Elmo]

wank: I am really not seeing your case on Ripley.

Originally he said his vote for Ripley wasn't really serious, but it seems he was happy to FoS him when he'd got someone on his side.

If why I'm suspicious of him, it's like I already said, the timing and reasoning for the FoS I didn't like.

I somewhat agree with Glork. The FoS strikes me as genuine, personally.

Since this is the next page, and Ether's away until tomorrow, here's an unofficial vote count:

4 Andycyca (IH, Crub, Elmo, Shanba)
2 appleof88 (Ripley, Patrick)
2 IH (JDodge, Glork)
2 Ripley (appleof88, wank)
2 wank (Andycyca, Sikario8)

12 alive; 7 to lynch.

[Ether]

4 Andycyca (IH, Crub, Elmo, Shanba)
2 appleof88 (Ripley, Patrick)
2 IH (JDodge, Glork)
2 Ripley (appleof88, wank)
2 wank (Andycyca, Sikario8)

12 alive; 7 to lynch.

(As it happens, I do have Internet access. This was copied and pasted from Elmo's count in the above post, which despite being perfectly accurate would not be very helpful to someone filtering my posts for a list of vote-counts.)

[Elmo]

Oh, awesome. Hai <3

[IH]

I do not see an Iah behind that [/spam]

[Andycyca]

(Sorry, heavy exam time. Will be back by tue)

[wank]

I guess it's a matter of play style. Ripley exercised fairly considerable effort in fighting my accusation and now he's finally fed up with my probes. I wonder what he would do if half of the people were on his case...

[Crub]

I guess it's a matter of play style. Ripley exercised fairly considerable effort in fighting my accusation and now he's finally fed up with my probes. I wonder what he would do if half of the people were on his case...

Probably get increasingly pissed off at the pathetic crap logic case on him until he was lynched.

[wank]

Logic is overated in hunting scum.

[appleof72]

Logic is overated in hunting scum.

yeah i tend to just through everyones name into a hat...

[IH]

Uh, why do you think Ripley is "fed up with your probes"?

[Sikario8]

alive and moderately well...

[Elmo]

Skiario, what do you think of Patrick's vote and the exchange between Ripley and wank?

[Sikario8]

i think i'd better read the forum first

[Glork]

I want each person on Andy to give me exactly three sentences (between 15 and 45 words) on why they are voting for Andy.



gogogo

[JDodge]

I want each person on Andy to give me exactly three sentences (between 15 and 45 words) on why they are voting for Andy.



gogogo

i'm not voting andy, but can i do this anyways

[Glork]

Shhhhh. Let them go first.

[wank]

i think i'd better read the forum first

It's one thing if you are not playing but at least don't admit it publicly?

[Elmo]

His reaction in 42 feels false - it doesn't make sense regardless of whether he does or doesn't understand my mistake, and it feels like he's trying to play it up. His comment about Ripley's list in 77 seems obviously wrong, it wouldn't work as a false dichotomy unless people were braindead, and the comment about apple's "throwing everything against Ripley" seems fake. Both his response to "reading too much" in 87 about it being a 'coincidence' and his response regarding 42 strike me as off - I don't think Ripley did anything unusual, and I think he avoided my question a bit.

That was tricky. I think I've summarised it okay, but obviously I can't put every detail in.

[Sikario8]

i think i'd better read the forum first

It's one thing if you are not playing but at least don't admit it publicly?

I'm reading and present; it's just that I have nothing of substance to add at the moment. Wouldn't want to be the village idiot again, now would I?

[Crub]

I want each person on Andy to give me exactly three sentences (between 15 and 45 words) on why they are voting for Andy.

gogogo

Pressure = Good.
IH told me to.
What elmo said.

Not quite 15 words, and not quite sentences but I think you get the picture.

[Sikario8]

unvote wank

[Shanba]

Simple - I want him to respond to IH. Perhaps more concise than was asked for, but no point beating around the bush.

[IH]

Wank overestimates his abilities. = )

[Andycyca]

@Crub: I find it strange how you voted me for pressure, but so far, your posts in this game have been of little use to our discussion. Your second point is because IH told you so. Why exactly are you following his "orders"? and "What Elmo said" seems like you don't really have a case by yourself, you're based on someone else's thought. Why?

@IH:

I would also like to note that Andy didn't respond to me at all = |

I'm sorry, what was your question?

[Patrick]

Andy, who's your top suspect right now, if any?