I mean ending day 1 a week early without general consensus that that's an acceptable move is a bad thing to do regardless of one player promising a policy tunnel
Yeah. You should keep your vote on the wagon until you've decided where else you're going to put it. If you think Key is scum but then you take your vote off him like that, it just takes pressure off of him and you're not putting pressure anywhere else.
I've seen people ease off a person when there is time for discussion in another game. If that's not this site's protocol, then I'm sorry, but I'm still questioning xyz
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
...
Does this mean Gamma is town?
He can't bey key's partner, right?
I have little hope for democracy as an effective means of government, but I admire the poetry of how it makes its victims complicit in their own destruction.
Also, rb is confirmed not reading any of my posts, and probably none of you guys' either. So I'm taking his reads with a grain of salt for the time being.
I have little hope for democracy as an effective means of government, but I admire the poetry of how it makes its victims complicit in their own destruction.
|| Mini Normal 1848 || The Hogwarts Mafia || Valentine's Day || The Divergent Series || Another Mafia || Cities & Beaches || Moonlight || 13 Reasons Why ||
In post 336, Gamma Emerald wrote:Actually, I have an idea where to go. VOTE: xyzzy
Multiple people have connected you to key. What do you have to say about that?
It looks like you only moved your vote because you saw this post and thought that maybe this wagon would gain some traction since the key wagon has stalled.
In post 326, xyzzy wrote:I've read over keyenpeydee's ISO a couple times and this feels more like a townie who is at times playing poorly then scum to me
It's weird that you had your vote on X for ages now and didn't try to push it at all until a couple of people started talking about him again. I mean, you were at L-1. Why didn't you fight hard to get him lynched? I just think the timing of that post was grimy as hell
Because as far as I'm concerned, the game is about finding scum
, not having bad arguments over semantics and theory and clogging up the thread with so much intricate detail that it becomes more like a part-time job than a game and demotivates people from wanting to play. Motivated players and enjoyable game = co-operative,
play better this way because how good I play is directly linked to how much effort I'm willing to put into playing, which is directly linked to how much enjoyment I'm having.
As long as it doesn't stop
me
finding scum, preventing
my
slot from being sorted and
I'm
still active,
it's not hindering the town.
In post 145, rb wrote:Right so even though I mentioned
you're sitting here telling me I have to read every post
as if the way I'm playing is stopping the town from being successful. Stop trying to tell
me
the best way for
me
to play the game.
In post 161, rb wrote:Also to be clear I'm not arguing over CR's wall. People are overreacting and acting like I'm not reading the game, when I am. It took them 40 posts to realise this because it's actually them not paying attention. Now it's you.
Ironically, rb understands town a little too well.
I have little hope for democracy as an effective means of government, but I admire the poetry of how it makes its victims complicit in their own destruction.
