Here Michel is voting Blitz for not giving reasoning but it was RVS so the only "reasoning" he could give a joke reasoning. So it kind of looks like he's fussing at Blitz for not scumhunting when there was nothing to go off at this point of the game. I don't think that is impossible to come from scum.In post 14, MichelSableheart wrote:A vote is far more likely to generate discussion if you actually give a reasoning that can be discussed. The lack of reasoning with your vote could be the result of the fact that you don't actually want to generate discussion.
Bold1. I often see scum push a "WELL THEY/YOU DID IT FIRST SO ITS SCUMMIER!" Bold2 contradicts his previous statement that Blitz should have given a reasoning with his vote. Bold 3 is WTF. Why would we discuss a joke vote?In post 16, MichelSableheart wrote:1. He was the first to do nothing but place a naked vote.Transcend mentioned his rolepm, you switched.
2. He could have discussed your vote switch, he could have discussed Transcend's remark about the vote being based on role pm. He could have made up a reason based on past experiences with players. He could have made up a reason, period.3. Anything that can be discussed is better then no discussion at all.
"He could have made up a reason based on past experiences with players. He could have made up a reason, period.In post 87, MichelSableheart wrote:Nero, where are you getting the weird idea that i think joke reasons are acceptable?
3. Anything that can be discussed is better then no discussion at all"
Like he seems to be drifting between "Blitz should have given reasoning for voting Maria" and "Blitz should have discussed my/Nero's vote switch and Trans' fake pm guilty on Maria"
Like he seems to be drifting between "Blitz should have given reasoning for voting Maria" and "Blitz should have discussed my/Nero's vote switch and Trans' fake pm guilty on Maria"
This had already been talked about a few times before he posted about it.In post 569, MichelSableheart wrote:Kraska, could you explain where your initial townread on Maria came from?
It was me, not Michel that first said anything about Karnos' vote on Maria being the most opportunistic.In post 569, MichelSableheart wrote:Thor, what makes you say that Elyse's vote was the most opportunistic on the wagon? If I had to point out an opportunistic vote, I would look at Karnos. The reason he gave for joining the wagon was Maria's refusal to explain. I have a hard time thinking of a reason why scum would be more likely to refuse to explain then town, which makes me feel he might just have been looking for an excuse to join the wagon.Elyse's "I don't think Maria would get that flustered as town" seems far more natural to me.
His thing about Elyse's vote not being opportunistic seems like the only OT here. So what makes his posts super great? And even if he was town its not like anyone should trust his reads.In post 551, Nero Cain wrote:I mean I can understand the "Elyse could be bandwagoning!" but her vote wasn't even the worst. That belongs to Karnos or are we all just writing him off b/c he's new?
