Mafia 72: Peril in Panama - Game over!

Aimee · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 3:34 am

Being prodded hard: Kakeng, richman99, Sir Tornado.

Battle Mage · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:14 am

Jordan, it helps if u read the entire thread before you post analysis like that (and yeh, i'm a freaking hypocrite. But you should do as i say, not as i do.)

the rest of your post was pretty sound though.

UnFoS: Jordan

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:12 am

That was at last a decent post.

Unvote JordanA24

There are several people now that I would not mind see swinging by the end of the day, because their absence would probably improve the overall game, and moreover they have a good chance of being scum as well. I will wait to see what the prodded ones come up with first.

Unright · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:48 am

Bah.. Didn't realize I forgot to do this..

unvote

Battle Mage · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:09 pm

Vote: Gage

sorry about not doing this sooner. Following logic without understanding it, in order to join a BW, is poor form.

BM

JordanA24 · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:10 pm

Vote: Battle Mage

Why are you voting a claimed mason?

JordanA24 · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:11 pm

EBWOP:

Unvote Vote: Battle Mage

Battle Mage · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:12 pm

lol ffs. i srsly need to read this thread before i post.

Unvote

Not to mention pay attention to stuff on the SAME PAGE.

rofl.

Battle Mage · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:14 pm

*I'm not posting again until i've read the thread. But, in the meantime, Jordan i wouldn't mind if you want to explain to the rest of the players why BM-scum would want to repeatedly vote a claimed mason, in a blatantly scummy fashion, when they are clearly not going to be lynched. I can see why you might see my play as frustratingly idiotic, but i can't see how you can see my play as something a Mafia Member would do...

BM

Porochaz · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:24 pm

Hey everyone still here... Sir T is away with exams and stuff, he said he'd be back in a few days once its over but at the same time he asked to be replaced in the game I was in with him.

As for the matter at hand, ABR and Gage could be scum together... more likely newbie silliness and albert saving lives. However Im in heaps of games and I still know exactly is going on in each and Ive been here all of about 6 weeks. If not read then post or do wha I do read whilst posting. This conbined with the over reaction early on

unvote vote Battle Mage

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:43 pm

Unvote, vote Battle Mage

This is the obvious winning move for town.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:44 pm

L-1 btw. Nobody unvote BM.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 12:44 pm

BM, claim.

curiouskarmadog · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 2:47 pm

I confirm my vote on BM

Gage · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 5:44 pm

Battle Mage wrote:
Vote: Gage
sorry about not doing this sooner. Following logic without understanding it, in order to join a BW, is poor form.

BM

How insulting. I think I'm perfectly capable of understanding everything in this thread, thanks.

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:52 pm

I'm actually with BM on this one. His voting is at least premature and at worst stupid, but not scummy.

JordanA24 · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 12:39 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:BM, claim.

Unvote

We do not need any more claims at this stage.

Vote: ABR

Dragon Phoenix · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:14 am

I think we also do not need to lynch a claimed mason at this stage.

Battle Mage · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 2:16 am

rofl- IRONY. :p

Anyway as it looks like i'm on borrowed time, i guess the least i can do is to read through and post something decent. Will do that within the next hour or so.
At least in death i might be able to provide something useful for the town.

BM

JordanA24 · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:00 am

Dragon Phoenix wrote:I think we also do not need to lynch a claimed mason at this stage.

Well, that was a fuck up and a half.

Unvote

JordanA24 · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:00 am

Battle Mage wrote:rofl- IRONY. :p

Anyway as it looks like i'm on borrowed time, i guess the least i can do is to read through and post something decent. Will do that within the next hour or so.
At least in death i might be able to provide something useful for the town.

BM

You giving up already bro?

Battle Mage · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:02 am

JordanA24 wrote:
Battle Mage wrote:rofl- IRONY. :p

Anyway as it looks like i'm on borrowed time, i guess the least i can do is to read through and post something decent. Will do that within the next hour or so.
At least in death i might be able to provide something useful for the town.

BM
You giving up already bro?

lol it'd hardly be turn up of the century if i got lynched today. Not that i agree with the logic, but i can see why my play is dumb enough to constitute a policy lynch of sorts.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:15 am

Claim before we kill you.

JordanA24 · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:20 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:Claim before we kill you.

I stand by my previous point, having 3 people claim so early is bad for the town.

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Sun Nov 11, 2007 3:21 am

Not when you're about to kill one of them.