MathBlade (2): Wingback, Elyse
No Lynch (2): MathBlade, Killthestory
No Vote (2): Expedience, Egg
With 6 players living, a lynch requires 4/6 votes.
(expired on 2016-08-24 22:00:00)
Egg V/LA until 21 August
Their and I think it is you + Elyse but more sure on you.In post 1678, Wingback wrote:Hi Expedience, I suggest reading through the thread and posting your thoughts. I'm fairly confident the scumteam is Mathblade and Elyse so I obviously wouldn't want you to listen to Math on her no lynch proposal. I think we should be lynching Mathblade. Given the vote count right above should tell you that it's basically a choice between lynching Math and no-lynching, I suggest taking her advice with a grain of salt.
Basically a scumclaimIn post 57, BlankFace wrote:In post 56, House wrote:Which is why I didn't clarify until asked.In post 55, Robbnva wrote:yeah I wondered that also but decided it wasn't worth a post.
My Hmmm was a self-reminder to look back on later.
Bit confused by this line of though. Does the omission of ya really signify anything?
Seems a bit fake.In post 185, Egg wrote:Weak as fuck Page 1 scum reads:
Wake - Seems excited
Vedith - Basically copied Blank but changed the name then buddied Cmit
Cmit - Overly friendly and then called Hoopla's reaction "strange" without a vote or further thoughts
Hoopla - That reaction to BBMolla.
Rob - Over reaction to Elyse's vote on him.
^Yes, there are five. That's ok because I highly doubt I'm scumreading all five when I finish reading.
Now, progressing past Page 1, I like Rob's questioning Cmit for that comment about Hoopla. And I notice Cmit appears to be calling it scummy and still hasn't voted.
Hoopla's tone seems to be intentionally trying to get people to town read her. I see Rob noticed this as well. I guess Rob can be crossed off my original list for now. BBMolla is spot on about Rob. He's town and his Elyse vote sucks.
Cmit might just be misguided newbtown. The "everyone is confirmed scum" reads list might not be something newbscum would do.
Vedith's reaction to Hoopla's town bloc is town. I'm left with two weak scum reads (Wake and Hoopla) and no strong ones yet.
I'm only through the first two pages. Will finish this evening.
This doesn't make any sense to me.In post 196, Egg wrote:Hmm. These BBMolla votes (Rob and Elyse) look like wrong town. Scum might jump on though so I'm watching for that as I read more. If they don't, maybe BBMolla actually is scum, but not for supposedly suggesting massclaim because that's not what he was doing. His frustrated reaction surprisingly is reading town to me though so...yeah.
I don't like how quickly Elyse backed away from BBmolla. It's hard to explain but I think it was trying to emulate a town thought process rather than actually being one. Because it was so stilted.In post 197, Elyse wrote:In post 183, Vedith wrote:Wait, why would you back off your scum read?In post 181, Elyse wrote:I don't share Hoopla's townread on Molla but I'll back off since it seems like no one else sees what I see.
Surely you would want to convince us right now? Or are you happy to lynch outside of your scum reads?
Obviously I'm not happy to lynch outside my scumreads. These are terrible questions that make you look like you're scumhunting when you're not.
I'm not going to continue with my "BB lied and is scum" case because multiple people are saying he's stubborn town. It's a black and white thing that I can't really convince people on. Either you think he's lying scum or frustrated, stubborn town. Continuing that line of attack is useless. I'm going to pursue him in other ways if he continues to be scummy.
Scumread on Vedith
In post 208, Egg wrote:Masquarade, you said that what followed Grendel's RQS was boring. What do you think of those who refused to answer? I also noticed you didn't list any strengths. Do you really not know of any? Because you said you prefer playing scum and "sort of" change strengths and weknesses with alignment and it kind of feels like you had scum strengths in mind that you didn't want to share. How do you know your strengths and weaknesses change without knowing what your strengths are?
In post 226, Robbnva wrote:3. Null
ew I really didn't get this impression and I'm considering bussing here. This read is super reachy after all the benefits of the doubt Egg has granted everyone else.In post 227, Egg wrote:3. Interesting. You're acting like you have a strong town read on him.
"I don't have to do anything because nobody will listen to me even though i caught scum on page 1 qqqqqq"In post 273, Elyse wrote:Do you think me continuing to push "BB was caught in a lie, he's caughtscum" is useful if no one feels the same way? It's literally just me repeating myself over and over again. I've laid out the evidence and BB even admitted he was wrong. I don't know what else to do. Follow me or don't.In post 257, Wake1 wrote:Elyse, I'm torn on 197. I agree with Vedith asking you why you would back off your Scumread, because I think if you suspect someone you should give voice at every opportunity. His latter two questions felt slightly underhanded. Initially I wanted to back Vedith against you over your Scumread of him in response to his 183. But, when reading his two latter questions they do feel Scummy to me.
Vedith, would you please provide feedback?
That was just such an easy thing to jump on for scum and Vedith of course took that opportunity.
Disclaimer: I'm actually VT.
I'm not sure where the scumread on BBmolla went but otherwise I kinda like this vote.In post 385, Elyse wrote:Scumread on BlankFace.In post 382, BlankFace wrote:It wasn't bolder in the original post.
Look at his ISO.
He's not doing anything, still has his RVS vote on me, and has barely commented on the gamestate, only to poke and prod here and there. Terrible.
In fact
VOTE: BlankFace
"Why me": the movie: the bookIn post 390, BlankFace wrote:The only interesting thing that has happened in this game is cmit's mass claim post. And that's already been talked to death. Everything else was weak.In post 385, Elyse wrote:Scumread on BlankFace.In post 382, BlankFace wrote:It wasn't bolder in the original post.
Look at his ISO.
He's not doing anything, still has his RVS vote on me, and has barely commented on the gamestate, only to poke and prod here and there. Terrible.
In fact
VOTE: BlankFace
Having three players bitch about each other for five or six pages isn't compelling. I had to no interest to read through that. It doesn't affect the game state and the emotions that came out of it are NAI. I have had more fun staring at a wall than I did going through that. I had enough of that in Mini 1674 and I'm not wasting my time on it again.
As for the RVS vote, let's look at who still has an RVS vote right now:
1. Me
2. Vedith
3. ChaosOmega
4. Grendel [In that they haven't voted all game, just opened with RQS]
5. Mask
Of those, Chaos has probably done the most. A bit of Pressure on Masquerade, his vote probably shouldn't count as RVS from the looks of it. He also added into the Vedith wagon without changing his vote. I also noticed that neither Mask or Vedith answered his questions. Even after Chaos asked Mask a second time for an answer.
Vedith has done just about as much as I have. Same post count, he's asked more questions than me but that's about it.
Each of Grendel's posts have dealt with the RQS. And there's nothing compelling about it. Breaking down Robb's, House's, Egg's, and Masqurade's RQS is fluff. Nothing there speaks to alignment.
@Grendel - What did you RQS questions get you?
Mask's posts are boring. Answering RQS, commenting on the Rob/House/Molla bitchfest. And that's about it.
I'm not counting Egg in the RVS vote count even thought they haven't voted, they came in at 185 and started hunting almost immediately.
So why did you focus on my vote, besides the fact that it is on you? Why did you focus on my activity when there are five/six other players with about the same amount of contribution as me?
If you want more content out of me, engage me. Because right now, I have no interest in rereading that sixish page bitchfest.
lolololIn post 1523, Elyse wrote:VOTE: Wingback
He just scumslipped
He said that me being at L-1 and Egg not hammering means that Egg is town
But if he was actually town he would realize that Egg and I could be scumbuddies
It has to be Wingback
Extreme effort != town. Extreme effort is extreme effort.In post 1684, Expedience wrote:lolololIn post 1523, Elyse wrote:VOTE: Wingback
He just scumslipped
He said that me being at L-1 and Egg not hammering means that Egg is town
But if he was actually town he would realize that Egg and I could be scumbuddies
It has to be Wingback
Elyse can't believe this!
Wingback is probably town and right (extreme effort = town? he's really enthusiastic about finding the right people not just "lynch this guy " x 999). I didn't read past page 30 (and contracted several forms of cancer) and I'm skimming backwards now.
I want to get to the part about Mathblade being readable though. I'm not sure that is a thing. Mathblade's posts feel strained and I think I'm getting something but it's not much and they have always came across as nonsensical to me in past games.
There is always KTS paranoia but nah.
"Pretty damn sure" that we're the team but votes Elyse... just like that. Before that in Post 1437, it's the same Wingback/Egg theory. And before that in Post 1418, it's all three of Egg/Wing/KTS that need scrutiny.In post 1451, MathBlade wrote:I am pretty damn sure Wingback + Egg is the team
This is a completely nonsensical tell in the same line as Elyse claiming I scumslipped by calling Egg town for not hammering her.In post 1672, MathBlade wrote:Lol was that like posted out of scum chat? If you think it's MathBlade+Elyse/Wingback. Generally people refer to themselves as "me".
This is just as ridiculous as the Hoopla/Elyse team Mathblade was proposing. They are tying whoever they want to Elyse but always having Elyse as a backpocket scumread. Classic scum behavior and Mathblade is certainly blatant enough as scum to do this.In post 1679, MathBlade wrote:Their and I think it is you + Elyse but more sure on you.