Mafia 72: Peril in Panama - Game over!

[Albert B. Rampage]

There is no pleasure in ending a life. It is a necessity, not something to wish for. Read up on Buddhism BM.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Back on topic,

Vote Sir Tornado

until he stops lurking.

[Battle Mage]

There is no pleasure in ending a life. It is a necessity, not something to wish for. Read up on Buddhism BM.

Lol any religion that teaches policies such as 'torture is better than killing' is clearly not worth reading up on.

[Albert B. Rampage]

The Buddhism part is unrelated to the rest of the sentence. The reason I want you to study east asian teachings is because you are evil.

[Battle Mage]

The Buddhism part is unrelated to the rest of the sentence. The reason I want you to study east asian teachings is because you are evil.

oh and of course those in North Korea have a competely clean conscience i suppose?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Communism hates religion, you scumtard.

[Battle Mage]

Communism hates religion, you scumtard.

What do you get if you cross Stalin with Abraham?

[Albert B. Rampage]

What are your thoughts on everyone BM ?

[Gage]

You guys never used green, blue and red?

You're "green" if you're a plain vanilla townie
You're "blue" if you're town aligned but with powers - cop, doc, etc
You're "red" if you're scum - mafia, SK, whatever

I figured the terms were almost universal. :S

I claimed to make the game more interesting. 'Twas a little boring. Nothing like someone claiming a role to stir the pot.

[Mastermind of Sin]

You guys never used green, blue and red?

You're "green" if you're a plain vanilla townie
You're "blue" if you're town aligned but with powers - cop, doc, etc
You're "red" if you're scum - mafia, SK, whatever

I figured the terms were almost universal. :S

I claimed to make the game more interesting. 'Twas a little boring. Nothing like someone claiming a role to stir the pot.

Over here, it's generally blue as town, red as scum, and green as cult. But we don't use them as terms, that's just for the color you're listed as after you die.

[mandalorian]

Of course, I suspect I'm now the favorite to lynch. If need be, I can roleclaim, because it isn't like I'm terribly important. There is also one person who can back me up, but I certainly am not going to roleclaim for them. If and when I roleclaim, they can back me up if they see fit.

Hang on. Did you just claim Mason or did you just say that you could be proven by the cop?

That "1 person who might not back me up" stuff sounds like he's Mason, but his Mason partner (he specified that there is only one) won't confirm his claim, although that is the only "power" that two Masons have.

Actualy, it was my intent to start by apologizing for submarrining. But, since my only post inluded a vote on Gage, more power to for cuting down on spam.

does this mean you believe the claim or not?

I most certanly do not. If one Mason is about to be lynched, the other one will claim to prevent the lynching of a pro-town. Isn't that the whole point of the "Mason" role? Gage's claim goes against logic. Thus, it must be false. My vote stays on him.

[Nekka-Lucifer]

Of course, I suspect I'm now the favorite to lynch. If need be, I can roleclaim, because it isn't like I'm terribly important. There is also one person who can back me up, but I certainly am not going to roleclaim for them. If and when I roleclaim, they can back me up if they see fit.

Hang on. Did you just claim Mason or did you just say that you could be proven by the cop?

That "1 person who might not back me up" stuff sounds like he's Mason, but his Mason partner (he specified that there is only one) won't confirm his claim, although that is the only "power" that two Masons have.

Actualy, it was my intent to start by apologizing for submarrining. But, since my only post inluded a vote on Gage, more power to for cuting down on spam.

does this mean you believe the claim or not?

I most certanly do not. If one Mason is about to be lynched, the other one will claim to prevent the lynching of a pro-town. Isn't that the whole point of the "Mason" role? Gage's claim goes against logic. Thus, it must be false. My vote stays on him.

It's also for planning scum traps. It works better with 2 people involved (Obviously)

[Gage]

My mason mate is actually bussing now. I'll reveal him (or he will reveal himself) only if necessary.

[Dragon Phoenix]

I have a hard time believing that he's a real mason claiming with hardly any pressure.

I have a hard time believing that he's scum claming with hardly any pressure (although 2 player mason group is one of the safest claim for scum in a game this size).

Since it is either the first or the second, I have decided that the second is more likely.

Vote Gage

[mandalorian]

Of course, I suspect I'm now the favorite to lynch. If need be, I can roleclaim, because it isn't like I'm terribly important. There is also one person who can back me up, but I certainly am not going to roleclaim for them. If and when I roleclaim, they can back me up if they see fit.

Hang on. Did you just claim Mason or did you just say that you could be proven by the cop?

That "1 person who might not back me up" stuff sounds like he's Mason, but his Mason partner (he specified that there is only one) won't confirm his claim, although that is the only "power" that two Masons have.

Actualy, it was my intent to start by apologizing for submarrining. But, since my only post inluded a vote on Gage, more power to for cuting down on spam.

does this mean you believe the claim or not?

I most certanly do not. If one Mason is about to be lynched, the other one will claim to prevent the lynching of a pro-town. Isn't that the whole point of the "Mason" role? Gage's claim goes against logic. Thus, it must be false. My vote stays on him.

It's also for planning scum traps. It works better with 2 people involved (Obviously)

This might be a newbie question, but: How do you trap scum by fake-claiming a Mason? What would the theoretical Scum have to do to get traped?

[Mastermind of Sin]

Gage is acting really dumb right now

Also, "bussing" implies that you're scum.

[Nekka-Lucifer]

Of course, I suspect I'm now the favorite to lynch. If need be, I can roleclaim, because it isn't like I'm terribly important. There is also one person who can back me up, but I certainly am not going to roleclaim for them. If and when I roleclaim, they can back me up if they see fit.

Hang on. Did you just claim Mason or did you just say that you could be proven by the cop?

That "1 person who might not back me up" stuff sounds like he's Mason, but his Mason partner (he specified that there is only one) won't confirm his claim, although that is the only "power" that two Masons have.

Actualy, it was my intent to start by apologizing for submarrining. But, since my only post inluded a vote on Gage, more power to for cuting down on spam.

does this mean you believe the claim or not?

I most certanly do not. If one Mason is about to be lynched, the other one will claim to prevent the lynching of a pro-town. Isn't that the whole point of the "Mason" role? Gage's claim goes against logic. Thus, it must be false. My vote stays on him.

It's also for planning scum traps. It works better with 2 people involved (Obviously)

This might be a newbie question, but: How do you trap scum by fake-claiming a Mason? What would the theoretical Scum have to do to get traped?

Confusion from Nekka-Lucifer strikes again.

I meant that Masons can plan a scum trap during the night and implement it on the day. Eg. Starting a fake bandwagon, and then claiming once scum have caught.

[Battle Mage]

What are your thoughts on everyone BM ?

I think Unright, Jordan and DP are scummy. Unright most of all though.

[Albert B. Rampage]

Why am I always paired with idiots ? I'm mason, hiii

[Albert B. Rampage]

Unright is most probably scum as well

[Porochaz]

best...mason...combo...ever...

[Albert B. Rampage]

Look, the dumbass outs himself at lynch -2. K. Then he implies that one of two people is his mason partner by saying that person 'bussed' him when I didn't even vote him. Since the other person is Unright, I have to out myself lest Unright the scum claims he is mason, which would be very believable.

Question: Why do we allow players with 0 post to play in large games ?

[Dragon Phoenix]

Well, provided that the two of you are not scum together, this must have been one of the most stupid plays I have seen on day one for a very long time.

Unvote Gage

[Albert B. Rampage]

Well, provided that the two of you are not scum together, this must have been one of the most stupid

plays

person I have seen on day one for a very long time.

Unvote Gage

[mandalorian]

Question: Why do we allow players with 0 post to play in large games ?

Winning smile? Hey, it's not like I'm submarrining (much). It's just taking me a bit to learn who all of you guys are, connect the names with avis etc.

Unvote

.